The Court's shift in attitude toward piercing the corporate veil

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malcolm Superville
Keyword(s):  
Piercing The Corporate Veil

Piercing the Corporate Veil: US Lessons for Romania & Slovakia

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Horvathova ◽  
Catalin Gabriel Stanescu
Keyword(s):  
Piercing The Corporate Veil

Recht auf Vergessen und piercing the corporate veil zugleich Anmerkungen zur Google-Entscheidung des EuGH, Rs. C-131/12 Google Spain SL und Google Inc.

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Schmidt-Kessel ◽  
Carmen Langhanke ◽  
Isabel Gläser ◽  
Hannah Kathrin Herden
Keyword(s):  
Search Engine ◽  
Data Protection ◽  
Public Law ◽  
General Concept ◽  
Economic Interests ◽  
The Public ◽  
Personal Involvement ◽  
Legal Writing ◽  
Piercing The Corporate Veil ◽  
Data Protection Law

AbstractWith its decision in the Google-case, the Court has put essential ground rules of EU data protection law in concrete terms. It has thereby deviated in several ways from leading opinions in legal writing which may partly be due to the fact that these are not free of personal involvement. More importantly though seems the conclusion that this decision underlines in many respects that theoretical patterns of EU private law are different from those of the traditional national law - and this divergence also holds true for major parts of the public law and, of course, data protection law. The Court has interpreted the responsibility with regard to data protection law and also the criteria in Art. 4 of the Directive very broadly, which has not met with general approval before. The ECJ strictly orientated itself by the general concept that even the search engine operator requires a permit for the processing of data. This in mind, it has given the fundamental right of data protection an important role in its considering in contrast to the user’s interest in respect of use of the service and the economic interests of the operator

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document