Academic Incivility: What Can I Do?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morteza Mahmoudi
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 133-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra P. Small ◽  
Denise English ◽  
Glenys Moran ◽  
Patricia Grainger ◽  
Geraldine Cashin

Background Studies indicate that incivility is common in nursing education and perpetuated by both students and faculty. Academic incivility negatively affects the well-being of those involved, interferes with the teaching–learning process, and is antithetical to nursing as a caring profession. An understanding of academic incivility is essential to establish best practices to address this problem. Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine incivility in nursing academia from the perspective of baccalaureate nursing students. Methods The study was conducted using a cross-sectional design, with a mixed method questionnaire administered to 380 students. The quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and qualitative data through content analysis. Results The majority of students thought incivility is a mild to moderate problem in nursing education. They thought that students contribute to incivility by not taking responsibility (being unprepared and being disinterested) for their education and by not being professional (being disrespectful and being uncaring) and faculty contribute by not being good teachers (being authoritarian, treating students unfairly, having ineffective teaching methods) and not being professional (being disrespectful, lacking compassion). Conclusion Until evidence is available for effective measures to address incivility, nursing schools should consider adopting strategies for solutions as suggested by the students in this study.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua K. Muliira ◽  
Jansi Natarajan ◽  
Jacoba van der Colff

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurul Ain Hidayah Abas ◽  
Mei-Hua Lin ◽  
Kathleen Otto ◽  
Izazol Idris ◽  
T. Ramayah

PurposeAcademia is known for its high competitiveness, with prestige and diverse responsibilities and achievements being decisive determinants of success resulting in academic incivility. This paper extends Lazarus and Folkman's theory of stress by examining the moderating role of interpersonal justice (IJ) , as supervisory support, on academics' job satisfaction and depressivity.Design/methodology/approachThe study recruited 185 academics from a public university in Malaysia to participate in a survey. Using the partial least squares- structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) analysis, academic incivility was negatively related to job satisfaction, whilst positively related to depressivity.FindingsAs hypothesized, it was found that the predicted detrimental effect of academic incivility on job satisfaction was buffered by perceiving high IJ from their immediate supervisors, i.e. deans or heads of department. An unanticipated finding was that there was a stronger relationship between academic incivility and depressivity for those academics who perceived high supervisory IJ.Practical implicationsFurther, academic management can formulate and revise zero-incivility policies and promote awareness explaining the detrimental impacts of incivility, despite support systems in academia.Originality/valueThis study provides the first empirical evidence showing the differential impact of supervisory IJ on two conditions of incivility–well-being relationships. Work culture and various sources of incivility should be considered for future research.


2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 411-419
Author(s):  
G. Thupayagale‐Tshweneagae ◽  
K.S. Dithole ◽  
W.M. Baratedi ◽  
S. Raditloko

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juanita Johnson-Bailey
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document