Rules Britannia: Analysing Britain's Regulatory Burden

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Hewson
Keyword(s):  
Regulatory Burden

Impact of regulatory framework rigidity on poverty in the regions of Russia

2020 ◽  
pp. 62-79
Author(s):  
P. N. Pavlov
Keyword(s):  
Economic Activity ◽  
Regional Level ◽  
Institutional Factors ◽  
Federal Regulations ◽  
Russian Regions ◽  
Poverty Dynamics ◽  
Regulatory Burden ◽  
Sectoral Structure ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Regions Of Russia

The paper analyzes the impact of the federal regulatory burden on poverty dynamics in Russia. The paper provides regional level indices of the federal regulatory burden on the economy in 2008—2018 which take into account sectoral structure of regions’ output and the level of regulatory rigidity of federal regulations governing certain types of economic activity. Estimates of empirical specifications of poverty theoretical model with the inclusion of macroeconomic and institutional factors shows that limiting the scope of the rulemaking activity of government bodies and weakening of new regulations rigidity contributes to a statistically significant reduction in the level of poverty in Russian regions. Cancellation of 10% of accumulated federal level requirements through the “regulatory guillotine” administrative reform may take out of poverty about 1.1—1.4 million people.

Towards Best Practice in Measuring Regulatory Burdens: A Case Study of Environmental Regulation in the Australian Rail Industry

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Wang ◽  
Tania von der Heidt ◽  
Michael B. Charles
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Regulation ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Regulatory Burden ◽  
Rail Industry

This article presents a methodology for quantifying the costs of dysfunctional environmental regulation faced by the Australian rail industry and derives indicative lessons for best practice with respect to measuring regulatory burden. By drawing on results from a recent benchmarking analysis, the suitability of the methodology is assessed. The study suggests that the methodology presented could be applied to other industries seeking to measure the policy-inefficient government regulatory burden. Further methodological improvements are also recommended.

scholarly journals Perception towards Regulatory Burden on Small and Medium Enterprises Performance: A Case Study in Shashemene Town, West Arsi Zone, Ethiopia

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 294
Author(s):  
Ofgaha Alemu Dire ◽  
Wegene Bekele Bekelcha
Keyword(s):  
Small And Medium Enterprises ◽  
Business Owners ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Regulatory Burden ◽  
Small And Medium Enterprise ◽  
Arsi Zone ◽  
Medium Enterprise ◽  
Broad Objective ◽  
Medium Enterprises

The study focuses on “perception towards regulatory burden on small and medium enterprise performance” in Shashemene town, west Arsi zone, Oromia regional state, Ethiopia. The study adopted a qualitative research approach to address broad objective through answering research questions developed by a researchers. Specifically, this study used questionnaire to collect data from SMEs business owners, managers and employees and in-depth interview conducted. Data was analyzed by using descriptive statistics. The information obtained from a samples of the 140 small and medium enterprise and through face-to-face interview of 10 owners of SMEs business. The respondents were selected using stratified sampling techniques. The result of the study show that small and medium enterprise challenges from different factors as they perceived from the challenges of regulatory burden and identifies mechanisms used to mitigate problems from regulatory burden and how much the regulators have smooth contact with them and to what extent regulators made inspections. Moreover, the result indicated the perception of SMEs businesses towards regulatory burden. As a whole, the study suggests a series of measures should be taken by government policy, makers and regulators for SMEs performance. Researchers’ conclude and recommend that government bodies, Small and medium enterprise business owners, managers, employees and policy makers should focus on regulation to reduce regulatory burden on small and medium enterprises.

Two monkey wrenches in the Russian regulatory reform

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Vladimir KUDRYAVTSEV ◽  
Ruslan KUCHAKOV ◽  
Daria KUZNETSOVA
Keyword(s):  
Administrative Data ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Regulatory Reform ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Business Community ◽  
Risk Regulation ◽  
Street Level ◽  
Regulatory Burden

The latest Russian regulatory reform (2016) sought to introduce the risk-orientated approach – a move away from the “blanket inspections” (or the risk regulation reflex – a term coined by Blanc in 2011) method that has been criticised by the Russian business community. The present paper aims to assess its success using administrative data on federal watchdogs’ inspections. We argue that this reform ultimately failed in its goal regarding the overall number of inspections, and thus the volume of regulatory burden did not change significantly throughout the reform. This failure resulted from two mechanisms. First, the legal framing of the reform radically redefined risk as the probability of incompliance (as opposed to the likelihood of accident). Second, the watchdogs used key performance indicators that incentivised “street-level” inspectors to maintain the pre-reform regulatory burden levels.

Can Land Use Regulation Be Smarter? Planners’ Role in the Informal Housing Challenge

2019 ◽  
pp. 0739456X1988027
Author(s):  
Eric J. Heikkila ◽  
Julia G. Harten
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Land Use Regulation ◽  
Informal Housing ◽  
Household Level ◽  
Regulatory Burden ◽  
Absorptive Capacities ◽  
Policy And Planning

Persistent urbanization is challenging planners to reimagine the absorptive capacities of cities. While more and more city dwellers respond to the challenge with informal solutions, policy and planning responses have fallen short of providing compelling answers. We propose redirecting attention to the use of land. This paper develops a model that centers on the role of land use regulation in conditioning and sustaining housing informality. Taking variations in income, location, and regulation into account, our framework uncovers the effective, household-level regulatory burden. Using this model to audit existing land use regimes gives planners the tools to plan effectively for targeted adjustments.

scholarly journals Measuring the Cost of Bailouts

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Lucas
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Direct Cost ◽  
Financial Institutions ◽  
The United States ◽  
Theoretical Framework ◽  
Sharp Contrast ◽  
Total Direct Cost ◽  
Cost Estimates ◽  
Regulatory Burden ◽  
The Cost

This review develops a theoretical framework that highlights the principles governing economically meaningful estimates of the cost of bailouts. Drawing selectively on existing cost estimates and augmenting them with new calculations consistent with this framework, I conclude that the total direct cost of the 2008 crisis-related bailouts in the United States was on the order of $500 billion, or 3.5% of GDP in 2009. The largest direct beneficiaries of the bailouts were the unsecured creditors of financial institutions. The estimated cost stands in sharp contrast to popular accounts that claim there was no cost because the money was repaid, and with claims of costs in the trillions of dollars. The cost is large enough to suggest the importance of revisiting whether there might have been less expensive ways to intervene to stabilize markets. At the same time, it is small enough to call into question whether the benefits of ending bailouts permanently exceed the regulatory burden of policies aimed at achieving that goal.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document