Testimony of Erik F. Gerding, “Industrial Loan Companies, Fintech Charters, and Eroding the Separation between Banking and Commerce,” for a Hearing before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Financial Services, Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Financial Institutions on “Banking Innovation or Regulation Evasion?: Exploring Modern Trends in Financial Institution Charters”

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik F. Gerding
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-58
Author(s):  
Abdulazeem Abozaid

Since its inception a few decades ago, the industry of Islamic banking and finance has been regulating itself in terms of Sharia governance. Although some regulatory authorities from within the industry, such as Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI) and Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB), the Islamic banking and finance industry remains to a great extent self-regulated. This is because none of the resolutions or the regulatory authorities' standards are binding on the Islamic financial institution except when the institution itself willingly chooses to bind itself by them. Few countries have enforced some Sharia-governance-related regulations on their Islamic banks. However, in most cases, these regulations do not go beyond the requirement to formulate some Sharia controlling bodies, which are practically left to the same operating banks. Furthermore, some of the few existing regulatory authorities' standards and resolutions are conflicted with other resolutions issued by Fiqh academies. The paper addresses those issues by highlighting the shortcomings and then proposing the necessary reforms to help reach effective Shariah governance that would protect the industry from within and help it achieve its goals. The paper concludes by proposing a Shariah governance model that should overcome the challenges addressed in the study.Pada awal berdiri, Lembaga Keuangan Syariah merupakan lembaga keuangan yang menerapkan Hukum Syariah secara mandiri dalam sistem operasionalnya. Ia tidak tunduk pada peraturan lembaga keuangan konvensional, sehingga dapat terus berkomiten dalam menerapkan Hukum Syariah secara benar. Selanjutnya, muncullah beberapa otoritas peraturan yang berasal dari pengembangan Lembaga Keuangan Syariah. Diantaranya adalah Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB) dan Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI). Hal ini tidak menyimpang dari kerangka peraturan Hukum Syariah, sebab standar peraturan dan keputusan yang dikeluarkan ditujukan khusus untuk Lembaga Keuangan Syariah saja. Beberapa Negara telah menerapkan peraturan tata kelola Hukum Syariah pada Bank Syariah mereka. Namun dalam banyak kasus, peraturan yang diterapkan tidak mampu mengontrol Lembaga Keuangan Syariah tersebut secara penuh. Sehingga, secara praktis proses pengawasan diserahkan kepada lembaga keuangan yang beroperasi. Akan tetapi, beberapa standar dan keputusan yang dikeluarkan oleh sebagian pemangku kebijakan bertentangan dengan keputusan yang dikeluarkan oleh beberapa akademi Fiqh. Artikel ini ditulis untuk menyoroti permasalahan yang timbul pada tata kelola Lembaga Keuangan Syariah, khususnya kekurangan yang tampak pada sistem tata kelola. Kemudian, penulis akan mengajukan usulan tentang efektifitas tata kelola Lembaga Keuangan Syariah yang bebas dari permasalahan.


2021 ◽  
pp. 275-287
Author(s):  
Christian Castro

In recent years the rise of Islamic banking has been one of the most important trends in the economic sphere, with an estimated 1.5 billion Muslims in the world, this arena has plenty of room for expansion. Conforming to Shariah (Islamic Law) puts a huge demand among Muslims looking for financial products and services that adhere to their beliefs. If it weren’t for the creation of such alter-natives to conventional banking and finance, Muslims would find it hard to participate in our globalized world without violating their religious principles. There are currently over 300 financial Institutions across the global sphere providing some type of Islamic financial product. According to some experts, the assets that are currently being managed under Shariah law, which range from investment to commercial banks and investment funds, are estimated to be no less than 300 billion. Other experts in the industry estimate the assets under mana-gement to be much larger. The FSA (Financial Services Authority), a regulator for financial services based out of London, estimates the total amount associated with Shariah banking to be as much as 500 billion. Even the U.S rating agency, S & P, estimates the sukuk (deed) market has reached over 75 billion and will likely be over 150 billion by the end of the decade. It used to be that Islamic fi-nancial products were more of a niche market but over time they are now considered mainstream, with many well-known interna-tional financial institutions battling to get a little piece of the pie.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mellisa Rahmaini Lubis

Consumers loses have occurred in the practice of Fintech-based loans by non-bank financial institutions. The reports of losses arising from Fintech transactions has increased. This is because many Fintech organizers have not received permission from the OJK but are still able to conduct business activities in Indonesia. The problem in this study is: How is the supervision by the Financial Services Authority (OJK) of non-bank financial institutions providing fintech-based venture capital lenders for MSMEs? And how is the legal consequences of fintech-based business capital loan services for MSME entrepreneurs. The study used normative legal approach and the data analyzed by descriptive qualitative.          The results of this study indicate that supervision by the OJK of non-bank financial institutions providing fintech-based venture capital lenders for SMEs as a form of legal protection to consumers. It is carried out in the form of preventive and repressive protection. Preventive protection is implemented by enacting OJK Regulation Number 77 / POJK.01 / 2016, OJK Circular Letter Number 18 / SEOJK.02 / 2017 and OJK Regulation Number 1 / POJK.07 / 2013 concerning Consumer Protection in the Financial Services Sector. Repressive protection is by applying sanctions against fintech organizers who commit violations in the form of written warnings and fines; restrictions on business activities; and revocation of permission. The legal consequences arising from fintech-based business capital loan services for SMEs to fintech providers are required to improve standards and meet consumer protection aspects. The legal consequence for MSMEs is the potential for fraud and misuse of consumer data by Fintech service providers.


Author(s):  
Roikhan Mochamad Aziz ◽  
Acep R. Jayaprawira ◽  
Sulistyowati Sulistyowati

The research aims to know the variables that affect the assets of Pension Funds by Financial Institutions (DPLK, Pension funds by financial institution) Muamalat, which is the performance of Bank Muamalat as internal factors that described in the variable Profit of Bank Muamalat and third-party funds. The external factors are Bank Indonesia Sharia Certificates (SBIS, Sertifikat Bank Indonesia Syariah) as an indicator of the placement of Islamic funds, and profit of DPLK Muamalat as a religious factor.The method used in this research is done by Multiple Correlation Regression Analysis with monthly data starting from April 2008 (since the existence of SBIS) until October 2017. Moreover, Analysis Method of HahSlm Theory is added which is an analysis that approached according to Islamic thinking model to provide a benchmark that corresponds to the religious value.The final result of this study emphasizes that all factors, which consist of the internal factors, external factors and religious factors, affect the assets of DPLK Muamalat. It is interesting to know that the profit of Bank Muamalat has a negative correlation. That is certainly not in accordance with the existing theory that performance or credibility of the main business (Bank Muamalat) has a big influence on the performance of DPLK Muamalat. It is expected that the results of the research is useful for every party, from the regulator party like the Financial Services Authority (OJK, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan), the industrial parties (the other DPLK), the company, and the participants of the Pension Funds by Financial Institutions.


2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (2/3) ◽  
pp. 183-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesley White ◽  
Venkat Yanamandram

This research investigated inertia in a financial‐services context, with particular focus on the reasons for consumers’ dissatisfaction and inert behaviour, and studied customers’ complaining behaviours and past and future inertia. The study utilised a two‐part methodology, including both qualitative and quantitative research. A total of 20 in‐depth interviews provided the preliminary data required for developing a questionnaire that was subsequently completed by 410 respondents. Determinants of dissatisfaction included the number and size of account fees, whilst determinants of inertia were the perception of similarity between financial institutions and the complexity, costs and time inherent in switching. Factors differentiating future inertia and future active customers included the type of account, length of time the account had been held, membership of a number of financial institutions, income and level of consideration given to changing financial institution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document