Economic Engagement of Mothers: Entrepreneurship, Employment, and the Motherhood Wage Penalty

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Looze ◽  
Sameeksha Desai
2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Alberto Molina ◽  
Víctor M. Montuenga

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Drasch ◽  
Martin Abraham

Mothers still earn substantially less than women without children; this discrepancy is often referred to as the motherhood wage penalty. This paper examines one possible explanation for this penalty: the willingness to accept lower-paying jobs that have more favorable characteristics that help women reconcile family and work. This idea was formulated based on the theory of compensating wage differentials (CWDs). A factorial survey is used to empirically examine the willingness to accept lower-paying jobs. An online survey comprised 398 women who interrupted employment due to family reasons. The results suggest that mothers are willing to accept lower wages for better job characteristics and that in addition to wages, non-monetary characteristics are also important in shaping the re-entry decision.


2020 ◽  
Vol 88-89 ◽  
pp. 102416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewa Cukrowska-Torzewska ◽  
Anna Matysiak

ILR Review ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah J. Anderson ◽  
Melissa Binder ◽  
Kate Krause

This paper seeks an explanation for the well-documented wage disadvantage of mothers compared to women without children. An analysis of data from the 1968–88 National Longitudinal Survey of Young Women shows that human capital inputs and unobserved heterogeneity explain 55–57% of the gap. Further analysis suggests that mothers tended to face the highest wage penalty when they first returned to work. A finding that medium-skill mothers (high school graduates) suffered more prolonged and severe wage losses than either low- or high-skill mothers casts doubt on the work-effort explanation for the wage gap, according to which women reduce work effort in response to childcare duties. The authors instead cite variable time constraints: high school graduates are likely to hold jobs requiring their presence during regular office hours, and are unlikely to gain flexibility by finding work at other hours or by taking work home in the evening.


2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 1353-1380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dalit Gafni ◽  
Erez Siniver

Abstract We use a unique data set of all individuals who graduated from universities in Israel during the period 1995–2008 in order to investigate the widening of the gender wage gap during the years following graduation. It is found that the main explanation is having children, rather than skills or academic background. The results show that each additional child reduces a woman’s wage by 6.6%, and increases a man’s wage by 3.4%. Furthermore, we examine three channels that may explain the motherhood penalty: periods of non-employment, a shift to the public sector and lower-paying firms and the timing of births. Having children increases a woman’s period of non-employment while decreasing a man’s, and each month of non-employment due to maternity leave reduces a woman’s wage by 1.0%, while non-employment reduces a man’s wage by only 0.6%. Mothers tend to shift from the private to the public sector and from higher-paying to lower-paying firms, which offer a more flexible and more convenient work environment, at the cost of a lower salary. Finally, a delay in having children increases a woman’s wage while having little, if any, effect on a man’s wage. Furthermore, controlling for this variable reduces the estimated motherhood penalty.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document