Modeling Credit Spreads: The Cross-Section Method Revised

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurélien Vermylen
1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Z. Katsenelenbaum ◽  
L. Mercader del Rio ◽  
M. Pereyaslavets ◽  
M. Sorolla Ayza ◽  
M. Thumm

1923 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-444
Author(s):  
Helge Lundholm ◽  
James S. Plant ◽  
John C. Whitehorn

Across multiple measures of “liquidity” and a variety of methods to control for correlated characteristics of more- (less-) liquid bonds, the authors find only limited evidence of a liquidity premium in the cross section of corporate bonds. Specifically, although illiquid bonds have slightly higher credit spreads and directionally higher average returns, portfolios that tilt toward (away from) less (more) liquid bonds exhibit considerably higher levels of volatility. Economically, the low Sharpe ratios of illiquidity factor–mimicking portfolios are hard to justify for an investor. This is puzzling, as theory suggests investors should demand a risk premium for holding less-liquid assets.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document