Insider Trading Restrictions and Insiders’ Supply of Information: Evidence from Earnings Smoothing (Online Appendix)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivy Zhang ◽  
Yong Zhang
2020 ◽  
pp. 031289622094638
Author(s):  
Dewan Rahman ◽  
Robert Faff ◽  
Barry Oliver

We examine whether insider opportunism is reduced by board independence. Using a sample of 18,194 firm-year observations over the period 1996–2016, we show that board independence constrains opportunistic insider trading. Our identification strategy uses the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX Act) and associated changes to the listing rules of NYSE/NASDAQ as a source of exogenous shocks in board independence. Our results are economically significant as insider opportunism declines by about 10.5%. We find that insider trading restrictions is the channel through which board independence reduces insider opportunism. Our additional analyses show that in competitive and R&D (research and development) intensive firms, the impact of board independence on opportunism is less pronounced. We also find that board independence constrains opportunism only in less complex firms. However, in co-opted boards, independent directors are less effective. Overall, we support the monitoring channel of board independence for reducing insider opportunism. JEL Classification: G14, G34, G40


2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-237
Author(s):  
Beatriz Garcia Osma ◽  
Elvira Scarlat ◽  
Karin Shields

1980 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Dooley

Author(s):  
Robert M. Bushman ◽  
Joseph D. Piotroski ◽  
Abbie J. Smith

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document