Nasal High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants Less than 34 Weeks Gestation: A Multicentre Randomized Clinical Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingwang Zhu ◽  
Hongbo Qi ◽  
Chengjun Liu ◽  
Liping Shi ◽  
Jiang Xue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation ◽  
Oscillatory Ventilation ◽  
High Frequency Oscillatory

Frühgeborene: Nasale Hochfrequenz-Oszillationsbeatmung vs. nasaler CPAP

2021 ◽  
Vol 225 (05) ◽  
pp. 389-390
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation ◽  
Oscillatory Ventilation ◽  
High Frequency Oscillatory

Viele Frühgeborene mit einem Atemnotsyndrom (engl. Respiratory Distress Syndrome, RDS) erhalten zunächst eine nicht invasive Atemunterstützung. Ein chinesisches Forscherteam untersuchte nun, welche Methode besser vor einem invasiven mechanischen Beatmungsbedarf schützte: Der nasale CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) oder die nasale HFOV (High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation).

scholarly journals Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm infants after extubation: a randomized, controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 030006052098491
Author(s):  
Yan Li ◽  
Qiufen Wei ◽  
Dan Zhao ◽  
Yan Mo ◽  
Liping Yao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Oscillatory Ventilation ◽  
High Frequency Oscillatory

Objective To investigate the effectiveness and safety of non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) in post-extubation preterm infants. Methods This was a randomized, controlled trial. A total of 149 preterm infants aged between 25 to 34 weeks’ gestational age with a birth weight of <1500 g who required invasive mechanical ventilation on admission were included. After extubation, they were randomized to the NHFOV group (n = 47), nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) group (n = 51), or nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) group (n = 51). We compared the effectiveness and safety among these three groups. Results A total of 139 preterm infants finally completed the study. The reintubation rate was significantly lower in the NHFOV group than in the other groups. The duration of non-invasive ventilation and the length of hospital stay in the NHFOV and NIPPV groups were significantly shorter than those in the NCPAP group. The incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in the NHFOV and NIPPV groups was significantly lower than that in the NCPAP group. The NHFOV group had significantly less nasal injury than the NCPAP group. Conclusion As post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants, NHFOV has a lower reintubation rate compared with NCPAP and NIPPV, without increasing the rate of complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document