Epistemic Twilight Zone Of Sexual Consent

Comprehension of Sexual Consent as a Key Factor in the Perpetration of Sexual Aggression among College Men

PsycEXTRA Dataset ◽

10.1037/e574242014-164 ◽

2014 ◽

Author(s):

Peter Warren ◽

Suzanne Swan ◽

Christopher Allen

Keyword(s):

Sexual Aggression ◽

College Men ◽

Sexual Consent ◽

Key Factor

Download Full-text

#consent: University students’ perceptions of their sexual consent education

The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality ◽

10.3138/cjhs.2020-0007 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 29 (2) ◽

pp. 154-166

Author(s):

Airica MacDougall ◽

Sarah Craig ◽

Kaitlyn Goldsmith ◽

E. Sandra Byers

Keyword(s):

University Students ◽

Sexual Consent

Download Full-text

Affirmative sexual consent? Direct and unambiguous consent is rarely included in discussions of recent sexual interactions

The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality ◽

10.3138/cjhs.2017-0040 ◽

2018 ◽

pp. 1-13

Author(s):

Erin J. Shumlich ◽

William A. Fisher

Keyword(s):

Sexual Consent

Download Full-text

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Conservation of coevolving protein interfaces bridges prokaryote-eukaryote homologies in the twilight zone.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature ◽

10.3410/f.727107898.793530233 ◽

2017 ◽

Author(s):

Mark Wass

Keyword(s):

Twilight Zone ◽

Protein Interfaces

Download Full-text

Sexual Consent without Passivity

Journal of Tort Law ◽

10.1515/jtl-2021-0004 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 0 (0) ◽

Author(s):

Tom Dougherty

Keyword(s):

Sexual Activity ◽

Sexual Consent ◽

Sexual Offence ◽

Sexual Encounter ◽

John Gardner

Abstract In “The Opposite of Rape,” John Gardner defends two central claims. The first claim is that consent is not necessary for morally permissible sex and the second claim is that giving consent pride of place in sexual offence policy has the unwelcome consequence of reinforcing sexist ideology. Gardner’s arguments for both claims rely on what I call the “Passive Consent Thesis” which is the thesis that “if A gives consent to B in a sexual encounter, then A is passive and B is active in the encounter.” Gardner argues that if sex that is good in a key respect, then they engage in joint sexual activity that is free of this asymmetry of agency. Building on work by Karamvir Chadha, I respond that even if someone is passive with respect to the action to which they consent, they can still be active with respect to a different action that they perform themselves. Consequently, I maintain that two people can give each other consent while engaging in joint sexual activity.

Download Full-text