Evidence on the Decision Usefulness of Fair Values in Business Combinations

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Blann ◽  
John L. Campbell ◽  
Jonathan E. Shipman ◽  
Zac Wiebe
Keyword(s):  
Business Combinations ◽  
Decision Usefulness

OBJECTIVES OF FINANCIAL REPORTING, ABORIGINAL COST, AND POOLING OF INTERESTS ACCOUNTING

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo Nurnberg
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Information Needs ◽  
Public Utility ◽  
Financial Reports ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Business Combinations ◽  
Decision Usefulness ◽  
Rate Base ◽  
Utility Rate

ABSTRACT Through the years, pooling of interest accounting was criticized as contrary to the decision usefulness objective of financial reporting and potentially misleading to stockholders and creditors, the assumed principal users of financial reports. This paper does not dispute those criticisms. It demonstrates, however, that there were some very good reasons for permitting pooling accounting for certain business combinations when the method was developed in the 1940s. At that time, the basic objectives of financial accounting encompassed stewardship and decision usefulness for multiple users, including public utility regulators and public policy makers. Pooling accounting developed in part to satisfy the information needs of public utility regulators who favored aboriginal (original historical) cost to determine the utility rate base; additionally, it was favored by public policy makers who sought lower utility rates (prices) to foster social and economic goals.

The Realities of Business Combinations

1970 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 28-32
Author(s):  
Herbert C. Knortz
Keyword(s):  
Business Combinations

AN ACCOUNTANT'S EDUCATION

2003 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
George J. Staubus
Keyword(s):  
20Th Century ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Financial Accounting ◽  
University Of Chicago ◽  
Financial Accounting Standards Board ◽  
Decision Usefulness ◽  
Market Simulation ◽  
Broad Field ◽  
The University

This is a review of how various experiences in my career have contributed to my understanding of accounting. I recall the circumstances surrounding several of my efforts towards the development of accounting theories, viz. (1) decision-usefulness theory, (2) activity costing, and (3) market simulation accounting, as well as my excursion into (4) market association research in seeking to validate decision-usefulness theory and (5) a search for the effects of firms' economic environments on the development of enterprise accounting in the 2nd millennium, C.E. I give my impressions of several of the important players in the evolution of accounting thought in the 20th century with whom I was closely associated, such as Vatter, Moonitz, Chambers, and Sterling, as well as other prominent figures in the broad field of accounting. Some of my gains from associations with three institutions—the American Accounting Association, The University of Chicago, and the Financial Accounting Standards Board—are identified. I conclude with a few summary thoughts on what I have learned.

Response to FASB Invitation to Comment on Methods of Accounting for Business Combinations: Recommendations of the G4+1 for Achieving Convergence

1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Wahlen ◽  
James R. Boatsman ◽  
Robert H. Herz ◽  
Ross G. Jennings ◽  
Gregory J. Jonas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Business Combinations

Heineken's Acquisition of Asia Pacific Breweries: Accounting for Business Combinations and Changes in Ownership Interests

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 101-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pearl Tan ◽  
Chu-Yeong Lim
Keyword(s):  
Market Share ◽  
Joint Venture ◽  
Interesting Case ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Joint Control ◽  
Business Combinations ◽  
Final Offer ◽  
Control Premium ◽  
Joint Venture Partner

ABSTRACT On July 20, 2012, Heineken, a Dutch brewery offered S$5.125 billion (Singapore dollars; approximately US$4.1 billion) to buy Asia Pacific Breweries Ltd (APB; formerly, Malayan Breweries Limited) from its Singapore-based joint venture partner, Fraser and Neave, Limited. (F&N). At that point, Heineken and F&N had joint control over APB through the joint venture vehicle Asia Pacific Investments Pte Ltd (APIPL). Brewery business under the joint arrangement had moved on quite predictably from the time APB was formed in 1931. However, the calm changed to high drama when Thai Beverage, owned by one of Thailand's tycoons, made a bid for F&N and APB. Heineken was quick to respond by aggressively buying shares of APB, leading to a large control premium being paid in the final offer price. The bidding war was largely motivated by the Dutch and Thai beer giants, each wanting to own the iconic Tiger beer brand that was owned by APB and thus take control of APB's strong market share in the fast-growing market of Asia. The Heineken bid for APB presents an interesting case study regarding the motivations for acquisitions, the nature of control, and accounting for acquisitions. The case also presents rich issues in accounting for changes in ownership interests with and without gain of control.

scholarly journals The Timing of Goodwill Write-off: Cases of Initial Overpayment

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Jamaliah Abdul Majid ◽  
Robiah Abu Bakar ◽  
Nor Asma Lode
Keyword(s):  
Annual Reports ◽  
Accounting Choice ◽  
Business Combinations ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Goodwill Impairment ◽  
Depth Analysis ◽  
The Future ◽  
Choice Literature ◽  
Acquisition Price

<p>This paper explores types of accounting choice related to reporting goodwill impairment losses, if any, exercised by Malaysian listed firms after an implementation of IFRS 3. The study is carried out through an in-depth analysis of annual reports for fifteen firms over a number of years. The fifteen firms selected are those that have goodwill arising from business combinations in December 2006/7, reported goodwill impairment losses in the current year or the future year(s), and the goodwill represents 50% or more of the acquisition price. Results show that of the fifteen firms examined, eight firms appeared to exercise the accounting choice in the form of opportunistic timing in reporting the impairment losses. The study contributes to the accounting choice literature by providing evidence on the timing of goodwill impairment losses for goodwill that arose from an apparent overpayment made at the time of an acquisition of a subsidiary.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document