Preventing and Detecting Cyber Attacks (Stl & Amf) on Additive Manufacturing (Am) Process Chain

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anil Lamba ◽  
Satinderjeet Singh ◽  
Balvinder Singh ◽  
Natasha Dutta ◽  
Sivakumar Sai Rela Muni
2018 ◽  
Vol 108 (06) ◽  
pp. 435-440
Author(s):  
E. Abele ◽  
T. Scherer ◽  
E. Schmidt

Die additive Fertigung von Zerspanungswerkzeugen rückt stärker in den Fokus industrieller und wissenschaftlicher Forschungsarbeiten. Die Designfreiheit additiver Verfahren ermöglicht die Herstellung komplexer Bauteile mit materialeffizienter und kraftflussgerechter Geometrie. Um diese Potenziale für neuartige Werkzeugkonzepte zu nutzen, wird eine CAE-Prozesskette zur Durchführung einer Finite-Elemente-Analyse (FEA) und anschließender Strukturoptimierung, basierend auf am Markt verfügbaren Softwarelösungen, vorgestellt.   Additive manufacturing of cutting tools is becoming more and more the focus of industrial and scientific research. The freedom of design of additive processes enables the production of complex components with material-efficient and force flux oriented geometry. To exploit this potential for novel tool concepts, a CAE process chain is presented for implementing an FEA and subsequently optimizing the structure based on software solutions available on the market.


2021 ◽  
Vol 111 (06) ◽  
pp. 363-367
Author(s):  
Lukas Langer ◽  
Matthias Schmitt ◽  
Georg Schlick ◽  
Johannes Schilp

Die additive Fertigung ermöglicht komplexe Geometrien und individualisierte Bauteile. Die hohen Material- und Fertigungskosten können ein Hindernis für einen wirtschaftlichen Einsatz sein. In der hybriden additiven Fertigung werden die Vorteile konventioneller sowie additiver Fertigungsverfahren kombiniert. Für eine weitere Steigerung der Wirtschaftlichkeit und Effizienz werden nichtwertschöpfende Schritte der Prozesskette identifiziert und Automatisierungsansätze entwickelt.   Additive manufacturing enables complex geometries and individualized components. However, high material and manufacturing costs can be a hindrance for economical use. Hybrid additive manufacturing combines the advantages of conventional with additive manufacturing processes. For a further increase in profitability and efficiency, non-value-adding steps in the process chain are identified and automation approaches developed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 138-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Zhang ◽  
David Bue Pedersen ◽  
Asger Segebrecht Gøtje ◽  
Michael Mischkot ◽  
Guido Tosello

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahyar Khorasani ◽  
AmirHossein Ghasemi ◽  
Bernard Rolfe ◽  
Ian Gibson

Purpose Additive manufacturing (AM) offers potential solutions when conventional manufacturing reaches its technological limits. These include a high degree of design freedom, lightweight design, functional integration and rapid prototyping. In this paper, the authors show how AM can be implemented not only for prototyping but also production using different optimization approaches in design including topology optimization, support optimization and selection of part orientation and part consolidation. This paper aims to present how AM can reduce the production cost of complex components such as jet engine air manifold by optimizing the design. This case study also identifies a detailed feasibility analysis of the cost model for an air manifold of an Airbus jet engine using various strategies, such as computer numerical control machining, printing with standard support structures and support optimization. Design/methodology/approach Parameters that affect the production price of the air manifold such as machining, printing (process), feedstock, labor and post-processing costs were calculated and compared to find the best manufacturing strategy. Findings Results showed that AM can solve a range of problems and improve production by customization, rapid prototyping and geometrical freedom. This case study showed that 49%–58% of the cost is related to pre- and post-processing when using laser-based powder bed fusion to produce the air manifold. However, the cost of pre- and post-processing when using machining is 32%–35% of the total production costs. The results of this research can assist successful enterprises, such as aerospace, automotive and medical, in successfully turning toward AM technology. Originality/value Important factors such as validity, feasibility and limitations, pre-processing and monitoring, are discussed to show how a process chain can be controlled and run efficiently. Reproducibility of the process chain is debated to ensure the quality of mass production lines. Post-processing and qualification of the AM parts are also discussed to show how to satisfy the demands on standards (for surface quality and dimensional accuracy), safety, quality and certification. The original contribution of this paper is identifying the main production costs of complex components using both conventional and AM.


2017 ◽  
Vol 107 (06) ◽  
pp. 426-431
Author(s):  
O. Refle ◽  
J. Günthel ◽  
M. Burgard ◽  
J. Janhsen ◽  
P. Springer ◽  
...  

Das Projekt „NextFactory“ kombiniert verschiedene Technologien mit dem Ziel, ein neuartiges Produktionsmittel zur Herstellung mikromechatronischer Systeme als funktionale Prototypen oder in kleinsten Stückzahlen zur Verfügung zu stellen. Der Fachartikel gibt einen Überblick zu dem produktionstechnischen Ansatz sowie zur Vision des Projekts und beleuchtet anschließend den aktuellen Projektstand. Zuletzt werden die aktuellen Ergebnisse zusammengefasst und ein Ausblick auf die kommenden Entwicklungsschritte gegeben.   The NextFactory project is based on different technological pillars to innovate the production technology for functional prototypes and small lot sizes of micro-mechatronic systems. This paper presents the vision of the project, followed by a closer look on the current status of the technological developments and concludes with the presentation of preliminary results and an outlook on the next development steps.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document