רגולציה 'עודפת' בישראל? - ניתוח תפוקת החקיקה הראשית והמשנית בישראל, 1948–2017 'Excessive' Regulation in Israel? - Analysis of Primary and Secondary Legislative Output in Israel

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Levi-Faur ◽  
Nir Kosti
Keyword(s):  
2001 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 853-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Frendreis ◽  
Raymond Tatalovich ◽  
Jon Schaff
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6(167) ◽  
pp. 223-253
Author(s):  
Witold Filipczak

The author discusses the legal framework of the legislative activity of ‘free’ (that is, not confederated) Sejms. He discusses parliamentary practice between 1778 and 1786 after a thorough analysis of the king’s legislative initiative with special emphasis on proposals submitted by the throne, and the role played by the Permanent Council in drafting laws. The author argues that numerous bills drafted by envoys had little impact on the results of Sejms because after the election and control of the executive authorities ended, there was no time to examine the drafts. Sejm decisions could be divided into two categories: a) decisions made before the separation of two chambers – concerning elections (of executive and judiciary authorities) and vote of acceptance for the Permanent Council; and b) legislative decisions made during further proceedings, with a special subcategory in the form of provisions related to the control over executive powers. The author also provides a quantitative analysis of legislative output between 1778 and 1786.


2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 110-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Keating ◽  
Linda Stevenson ◽  
Paul Cairney ◽  
Katherine Taylor
Keyword(s):  

The Forum ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 419-440
Author(s):  
Matthew N. Green ◽  
William Deatherage

Abstract In late 2017, congressional Republicans enacted a major tax bill despite voter opposition, resistance from organized interests, and considerable uncertainty about its policy consequences. Why did they do so? We argue that Republicans’ concern with their party’s reputation–in particular, its productivity brand–trumped negative evaluations of the legislation by citizens, interest groups, and policy experts. To support this claim, we analyze measures of legislative output, news media content, public opinion, and lawmaker sentiment. Our findings underscore the importance of party reputation in explaining legislative behavior and suggest that there may be explanatory value in distinguishing between different types of party valence brands.


2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Santoni ◽  
Francesco Zucchini

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document