Kinetochore Stretching-Mediated Rapid Silencing of Mitotic Checkpoint Required for Failsafe Chromosome Segregation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiko S.K. Uchida ◽  
Minji Jo ◽  
Kota Nagasaka ◽  
Motoko Takahashi ◽  
Norihisa Shindo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint

scholarly journals Aneuploid abortion correlates positively with MAD1 overexpression and miR-125b down-regulation

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Zhao ◽  
Hui Li ◽  
Guangxin Chen ◽  
Lijun Du ◽  
Peiyan Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Early Embryo ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Embryo Abortion ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Complex

Abstract Background Aneuploidy is the most frequent cause of early-embryo abortion. Any defect in chromosome segregation would fail to satisfy the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) during mitosis, halting metaphase and causing aneuploidy. The mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC), comprising MAD1, MAD2, Cdc20, BUBR1 and BUB3, plays a vital role in SAC activation. Studies have confirmed that overexpression of MAD2 and BUBR1 can facilitate correct chromosome segregation and embryo stability. Research also proves that miR-125b negatively regulates MAD1 expression by binding to its 3′UTR. However, miR-125b, Mad1 and Bub3 gene expression in aneuploid embryos of spontaneous abortion has not been reported to date. Methods In this study, embryonic villi from miscarried pregnancies were collected and divided into two groups (aneuploidy and euploidy) based on High-throughput ligation-dependent probe amplification (HLPA) and Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses. RNA levels of miR-125b, MAD1 and BUB3 were detected by Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR); protein levels of MAD1 and BUB3 were analysed by Western blotting. Results statistical analysis (p < 0.05) showed that miR-125b and BUB3 were significantly down-regulated in the aneuploidy group compared to the control group and that MAD1 was significantly up-regulated. Additionally, the MAD1 protein level was significantly higher in aneuploidy abortion villus, but BUB3 protein was only mildly increased. Correlation analysis revealed that expression of MAD1 correlated negatively with miR-125b. Conclusion These results suggest that aneuploid abortion correlates positively with MAD1 overexpression, which might be caused by insufficient levels of miR-125b. Taken together, our findings first confirmed the negative regulatory mode between MAD1 and miR-125b, providing a basis for further mechanism researches in aneuploid abortion.

scholarly journals Bub1 mediates cell death in response to chromosome missegregation and acts to suppress spontaneous tumorigenesis

2007 ◽  
Vol 179 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karthik Jeganathan ◽  
Liviu Malureanu ◽  
Darren J. Baker ◽  
Susan C. Abraham ◽  
Jan M. van Deursen
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Physiological Role ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Critical Threshold ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Checkpoint Protein ◽  
Chromosome Missegregation ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Protein

The physiological role of the mitotic checkpoint protein Bub1 is unknown. To study this role, we generated a series of mutant mice with a gradient of reduced Bub1 expression using wild-type, hypomorphic, and knockout alleles. Bub1 hypomorphic mice are viable, fertile, and overtly normal despite weakened mitotic checkpoint activity and high percentages of aneuploid cells. Bub1 haploinsufficient mice, which have a milder reduction in Bub1 protein than Bub1 hypomorphic mice, also exhibit reduced checkpoint activity and increased aneuploidy, but to a lesser extent. Although cells from Bub1 hypomorphic and haploinsufficient mice have similar rates of chromosome missegregation, cell death after an aberrant separation decreases dramatically with declining Bub1 levels. Importantly, Bub1 hypomorphic mice are highly susceptible to spontaneous tumors, whereas Bub1 haploinsufficient mice are not. These findings demonstrate that loss of Bub1 below a critical threshold drives spontaneous tumorigenesis and suggest that in addition to ensuring proper chromosome segregation, Bub1 is important for mediating cell death when chromosomes missegregate.

scholarly journals Stable hZW10 kinetochore residency, mediated by hZwint-1 interaction, is essential for the mitotic checkpoint

2008 ◽  
Vol 180 (3) ◽  
pp. 507-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakub K. Famulski ◽  
Larissa Vos ◽  
Xuejun Sun ◽  
Gordon Chan
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching ◽  
Enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Interaction Domain ◽  
Mutagenesis Screen ◽  
Localization Domain ◽  
Green Fluorescent ◽  
Surveillance Mechanism

The mitotic checkpoint is an essential surveillance mechanism that ensures high fidelity chromosome segregation during mitosis. Mitotic checkpoint function depends on numerous kinetochore proteins, including ZW10, ROD, and Zwilch (the ROD–ZW10–Zwilch complex). Through an extensive mutagenesis screen of hZW10, we have mapped the kinetochore localization domain of hZW10 as well as the hZwint-1 interaction domain. We find that hZwint-1–noninteracting mutants still localize to kinetochores. In addition, using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching, we have found that hZW10 residency at metaphase kinetochores is brief (half-time of 13 s). However, during prometaphase or at unattached kinetochores, enhanced green fluorescent protein–hZW10 becomes a stable component of the kinetochore. Moreover, we find that stable hZW10 kinetochore residency at prometaphase kinetochores is dependent on its interaction with hZwint-1, and is essential for mitotic checkpoint arrest.

scholarly journals Mechanism of APC/CCDC20 activation by mitotic phosphorylation

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (19) ◽  
pp. E2570-E2578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renping Qiao ◽  
Florian Weissmann ◽  
Masaya Yamaguchi ◽  
Nicholas G. Brown ◽  
Ryan VanderLinden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Loop Region ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved ◽  
Terminal Loop ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Mitotic Phosphorylation ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Complex

Chromosome segregation and mitotic exit are initiated by the 1.2-MDa ubiquitin ligase APC/C (anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome) and its coactivator CDC20 (cell division cycle 20). To avoid chromosome missegregation, APC/CCDC20 activation is tightly controlled. CDC20 only associates with APC/C in mitosis when APC/C has become phosphorylated and is further inhibited by a mitotic checkpoint complex until all chromosomes are bioriented on the spindle. APC/C contains 14 different types of subunits, most of which are phosphorylated in mitosis on multiple sites. However, it is unknown which of these phospho-sites enable APC/CCDC20 activation and by which mechanism. Here we have identified 68 evolutionarily conserved mitotic phospho-sites on human APC/C bound to CDC20 and have used the biGBac technique to generate 47 APC/C mutants in which either all 68 sites or subsets of them were replaced by nonphosphorylatable or phospho-mimicking residues. The characterization of these complexes in substrate ubiquitination and degradation assays indicates that phosphorylation of an N-terminal loop region in APC1 is sufficient for binding and activation of APC/C by CDC20. Deletion of the N-terminal APC1 loop enables APC/CCDC20 activation in the absence of mitotic phosphorylation or phospho-mimicking mutations. These results indicate that binding of CDC20 to APC/C is normally prevented by an autoinhibitory loop in APC1 and that its mitotic phosphorylation relieves this inhibition. The predicted location of the N-terminal APC1 loop implies that this loop controls interactions between the N-terminal domain of CDC20 and APC1 and APC8. These results reveal how APC/C phosphorylation enables CDC20 to bind and activate the APC/C in mitosis.

Dividing the goods: co-ordination of chromosome biorientation and mitotic checkpoint signalling by mitotic kinases

2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 971-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geert J.P.L. Kops
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Short Review ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Current Understanding ◽  
Chromosomal Stability ◽  
Mitotic Kinases

Error-free chromosome segregation during cell division relies on chromosome biorientation and mitotic checkpoint activity. A group of unrelated kinases controls various aspects of both processes. The present short review outlines our current understanding of the roles of these kinases in maintaining chromosomal stability.

scholarly journals Intermediates in the assembly of mitotic checkpoint complexes and their role in the regulation of the anaphase-promoting complex

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (4) ◽  
pp. 966-971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Kaisari ◽  
Danielle Sitry-Shevah ◽  
Shirly Miniowitz-Shemtov ◽  
Avram Hershko
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Unknown Species ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Complex

The mitotic (or spindle assembly) checkpoint system prevents premature separation of sister chromatids in mitosis and thus ensures the fidelity of chromosome segregation. Kinetochores that are not attached properly to the mitotic spindle produce an inhibitory signal that prevents progression into anaphase. The checkpoint system acts on the Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) ubiquitin ligase, which targets for degradation inhibitors of anaphase initiation. APC/C is inhibited by the Mitotic Checkpoint Complex (MCC), which assembles when the checkpoint is activated. MCC is composed of the checkpoint proteins BubR1, Bub3, and Mad2, associated with the APC/C coactivator Cdc20. The intermediary processes in the assembly of MCC are not sufficiently understood. It is also not clear whether or not some subcomplexes of MCC inhibit the APC/C and whether Mad2 is required only for MCC assembly and not for its action on the APC/C. We used purified subcomplexes of mitotic checkpoint proteins to examine these problems. Our results do not support a model in which Mad2 catalytically generates a Mad2-free APC/C inhibitor. We also found that the release of Mad2 from MCC caused a marked (although not complete) decrease in inhibitory action, suggesting a role of Mad2 in MCC for APC/C inhibition. A previously unknown species of MCC, which consists of Mad2, BubR1, and two molecules of Cdc20, contributes to the inhibition of APC/C by the mitotic checkpoint system.

scholarly journals Relief of the Dma1-mediated checkpoint requires Dma1 autoubiquitination and dynamic localization

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (18) ◽  
pp. 2176-2189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine M. Jones ◽  
Jun-Song Chen ◽  
Alyssa E. Johnson ◽  
Zachary C. Elmore ◽  
Sierra N. Cullati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Spindle Pole Body ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Pole Body ◽  
Septation Initiation Network ◽  
Anaphase B

Chromosome segregation and cell division are coupled to prevent aneuploidy and cell death. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the septation initiation network (SIN) promotes cytokinesis, but upon mitotic checkpoint activation, the SIN is actively inhibited to prevent cytokinesis from occurring before chromosomes have safely segregated. SIN inhibition during the mitotic checkpoint is mediated by the E3 ubiquitin ligase Dma1. Dma1 binds to the CK1-phosphorylated SIN scaffold protein Sid4 at the spindle pole body (SPB), and ubiquitinates it. Sid4 ubiquitination antagonizes the SPB localization of the Pololike kinase Plo1, the major SIN activator, so that SIN signaling is delayed. How this checkpoint is silenced once spindle defects are resolved has not been clear. Here we establish that Dma1 transiently leaves SPBs during anaphase B due to extensive autoubiquitination. The SIN is required for Dma1 to return to SPBs later in anaphase. Blocking Dma1 removal from SPBs by permanently tethering it to Sid4 prevents SIN activation and cytokinesis. Therefore, controlling Dma1’s SPB dynamics in anaphase is an essential step in S. pombe cell division and the silencing of the Dma1-dependent mitotic checkpoint.

scholarly journals Differential requirements for DNA replication in the activation of mitotic checkpoints in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 3315-3322 ◽  
Author(s):  
P A Tavormina ◽  
Y Wang ◽  
D J Burke
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Gamma Irradiation ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Dna Metabolism

Checkpoints prevent inaccurate chromosome segregation by inhibiting cell division when errors in mitotic processes are encountered. We used a temperature-sensitive mutation, dbf4, to examine the requirement for DNA replication in establishing mitotic checkpoint arrest. We used gamma-irradiation to induce DNA damage and hydroxyurea to limit deoxyribonucleotides in cells deprived of DBF4 function to investigate the requirement for DNA replication in DNA-responsive checkpoints. In the absence of DNA replication, mitosis was not inhibited by these treatments, which normally activate the DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoints. Our results support a model that indicates that the assembly of replication structures is critical for cells to respond to defects in DNA metabolism. We show that activating the spindle checkpoint with nocodazole does not require prior progression through S phase but does require a stable kinetochore.

scholarly journals Release of Mps1 from kinetochores is crucial for timely anaphase onset

2010 ◽  
Vol 191 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nannette Jelluma ◽  
Tobias B. Dansen ◽  
Tale Sliedrecht ◽  
Nicholas P. Kwiatkowski ◽  
Geert J.P.L. Kops
Keyword(s):  
Error Correction ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Normal Chromosome ◽  
Half Time ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Chromosome Attachment

Mps1 kinase activity is required for proper chromosome segregation during mitosis through its involvements in microtubule–chromosome attachment error correction and the mitotic checkpoint. Mps1 dynamically exchanges on unattached kinetochores but is largely removed from kinetochores in metaphase. Here we show that Mps1 promotes its own turnover at kinetochores and that removal of Mps1 upon chromosome biorientation is a prerequisite for mitotic checkpoint silencing. Inhibition of Mps1 activity increases its half-time of recovery at unattached kinetochores and causes accumulation of Mps1 protein at these sites. Strikingly, preventing dissociation of active Mps1 from kinetochores delays anaphase onset despite normal chromosome attachment and alignment, and high interkinetochore tension. This delay is marked by continued recruitment of Mad1 and Mad2 to bioriented chromosomes and is attenuated by Mad2 depletion, indicating chronic engagement of the mitotic checkpoint in metaphase. We propose that release of Mps1 from kinetochores is essential for mitotic checkpoint silencing and a fast metaphase-to-anaphase transition.

scholarly journals Relief of the Dma1-mediated checkpoint requires Dma1 autoubiquitination and dynamic localization

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine M. Jones ◽  
Jun-Song Chen ◽  
Alyssa E. Johnson ◽  
Zachary C. Elmore ◽  
Sierra N. Cullati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
E3 Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Essential Step ◽  
Septation Initiation Network ◽  
Anaphase B

AbstractChromosome segregation and cell division are coupled to prevent aneuploidy and cell death. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the septation initiation network (SIN) promotes cytokinesis, but upon mitotic checkpoint activation, the SIN is actively inhibited to prevent cytokinesis from occurring before chromosomes have safely segregated. SIN inhibition during the mitotic checkpoint is mediated by the E3 ubiquitin ligase Dma1. Dma1 binds to the CK1-phosphorylated SIN scaffold protein, Sid4, at the SPB, and ubiquitinates it. Sid4 ubiquitination antagonizes the SPB localization of the Polo-like kinase Plo1, the major SIN activator, so that SIN signaling is delayed. How this checkpoint is silenced once spindle defects are resolved has not been clear. Here we establish that Dma1 transiently leaves SPBs during anaphase B due to extensive auto-ubiquitination. The SIN is required for Dma1 to return to SPBs later in anaphase. Blocking Dma1 removal from SPBs by permanently tethering it to Sid4 prevents SIN activation and cytokinesis. Therefore, controlling Dma1’s SPB dynamics in anaphase is an essential step in S. pombe cell division and the silencing of the Dma1-dependent mitotic checkpoint.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document