Analysis and Implications of Three Cases and the Effect on Freedom of Speech in Public Schools: Tinker et al v. Des Moines Independent Community School District et al; 393 U.S. 503 (1969), Sissy Littlefield et al v. Forney Independent School District et al; 268 F.3d 275 (5th Cir. 2001), and Hazelwood School District et al v. Kuhlmeier et al; 484 U.S. 260 (1988).

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha J.
2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 202-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Cross ◽  
Erin D. Maughan ◽  
Donna Mazyck

As a district, Mansfield Independent School District wanted to validate that Health Services was performing at the highest level possible, implementing evidence-based practices, and achieving the highest outcomes with our students and staff. NASN (2016) had developed the Framework for 21st Century School Nursing Practice to illustrate the practice of school nurses; and sought ways to operationalize the Framework for local school nurses and district level use. This article will explain how the two groups partnered together to develop a tool and assessment program. The article will discuss the approach, challenges, and perspectives of both Mansfield Independent School District and NASN, lessons learned, outcome, and future/potential changes within health services.


This chapter focuses on the Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969) case – the first United States Supreme Court decision about student speech under the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. It discusses the two tests established in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District for determining the scope of school authority over student speech. These tests are the “material and substantial disruption” test and the “infringement-of-rights” test. The ultimate goal of the chapter is to analyze the Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District case in order to determine if it authorizes schools to censor off-campus student speech.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document