Efficacy and Safety of RC48-ADC, a Her2-Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugate, in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Phase 2, Open-Label, Multi-Centre, Single-Arm Study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinan Sheng ◽  
Xieqiao Yan ◽  
Lin Wang ◽  
Yanxia Shi ◽  
Xin Yao ◽  
...  
BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Grivas ◽  
Y. Loriot ◽  
R. Morales-Barrera ◽  
M. Y. Teo ◽  
Y. Zakharia ◽  
...  

Abstract Background ATLAS evaluated the efficacy and safety of the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in patients with previously treated locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). Methods Patients with UC were enrolled independent of tumor homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status and received rucaparib 600 mg BID. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (RECIST v1.1) in the intent-to-treat and HRD-positive (loss of genome-wide heterozygosity ≥10%) populations. Key secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Disease control rate (DCR) was defined post-hoc as the proportion of patients with a confirmed complete or partial response (PR), or stable disease lasting ≥16 weeks. Results Of 97 enrolled patients, 20 (20.6%) were HRD-positive, 30 (30.9%) HRD-negative, and 47 (48.5%) HRD-indeterminate. Among 95 evaluable patients, there were no confirmed responses. However, reductions in the sum of target lesions were observed, including 6 (6.3%) patients with unconfirmed PR. DCR was 11.6%; median PFS was 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.6–1.9). No relationship was observed between HRD status and efficacy endpoints. Median treatment duration was 1.8 months (range, 0.1–10.1). Most frequent any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events were asthenia/fatigue (57.7%), nausea (42.3%), and anemia (36.1%). Of 64 patients with data from tumor tissue samples, 10 (15.6%) had a deleterious alteration in a DNA damage repair pathway gene, including four with a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 alteration. Conclusions Rucaparib did not show significant activity in unselected patients with advanced UC regardless of HRD status. The safety profile was consistent with that observed in patients with ovarian or prostate cancer. Trial registration This trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03397394). Date of registration: 12 January 2018. This trial was registered in EudraCT (2017–004166-10).


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4592-TPS4592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petros Grivas ◽  
Dale L. Nepert ◽  
Kenton Wride ◽  
Daleen Thomas ◽  
Andrea Loehr ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4524-4524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke ◽  
Ari David Baron ◽  
Andrea Necchi ◽  
Elizabeth R. Plimack ◽  
Sumanta K. Pal ◽  
...  

4524 Background: In the open-label, single-arm, phase 2 CheckMate 275 trial, objective response rate (ORR) for patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) with nivolumab (NIVO) was 20.4% with minimum follow-up of 21.3 mo. Here, we report updated efficacy and safety data with minimum follow-up of 33.7 mo. Methods: Pts with platinum-resistant locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma received NIVO 3 mg/kg until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was ORR by blinded independent review committee (BIRC) by RECIST v1.1 (including duration of response [DOR]). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) by BIRC, overall survival (OS), and ORR per investigator. Efficacy was evaluated in all treated pts and by tumor PD-L1 expression. Safety and PFS by investigator were exploratory endpoints. Results: ORR by BIRC was 20.7% (95% CI 16.1–26.1) including 18 (7%) complete responses (CR; with 1 additional CR since the last report; Table). ORR per investigator was similar (24.8%). Median DOR by BIRC was 20.3 mo (95% CI 11.5–31.3). Of 56 pts with best overall response (BOR) of CR or partial response (PR), 59% had a DOR ≥12 mo. Median PFS (mPFS) was 1.9 mo per BIRC (95% CI 1.9–2.3; Table) and 2.0 mo per investigator (95% CI 1.9–2.5). Median OS (mOS) was 8.6 mo (95% CI 6.1–11.3; Table). 12, 24, and 36-mo OS rates were 40%, 30%, and 22%. While efficacy was numerically higher in pts with tumor PD-L1 expression ≥1%, efficacy was observed in all pts (Table). Any-grade treatment-related adverse events occurred in 69% of pts (grade 3–4, 25%), mostly (59%) within the first 3 mo of initiating therapy. Conclusions: With long-term follow-up from CheckMate 275, NIVO continues to provide durable antitumor activity in pts with mUC. No new safety signals were noted. Clinical trial information: NCT02387996. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17113-e17113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huayan Xu ◽  
Xinan Sheng ◽  
Xieqiao Yan ◽  
Zhihong Chi ◽  
Chuanliang Cui ◽  
...  

e17113 Background: RC48-ADC is a novel humanized anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC). A phase II clinical study showed that RC48-ADC has a good effect on locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma with HER2-positive expression that failed standard chemotherapy. In the study, some patients with HER2-postive immunohistochemistry (IHC 2+) but negative FISH test still benefit from the treatment of RC48-ADC.The study was to evaluate the activity and safety of RC48-ADC in HER2-negative patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Methods: This study is an open-label, single-center, one-arm, non-randomized phase II trial. Eligibility criteria include: histologically confirmed urothelial carcinoma, HER2-negasitive (IHC 0 or 1+), ECOG PS 0-1, treated with ≥1 prior systemic treatment. The patients received RC48-ADC treatment alone (2mg/kg IV infusion, q2w) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal, or study termination. The primary objectives were activity (ORR) and safety. Progress-free survival, disease control rate and overall survival will also be assessed. Results: As of February 2020, 8 patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 65 years old. At baseline, most patients (6/8) had visceral metastasis. 6 (75%) patients had received≥2 lines treatment and 4 (50%) patients had prior immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy in second line treatment. The objective response rate was 25% (2/8) and the DCR was 75% (6/8). The ORR was 33.3% (2/6) in patients with visceral metastasis and was 50.0% (2/4) in liver metastasis patients. The ORR was 33.3% (2/6) in patients post to ≥ 2 lines of treatment and 25% (1/4) in patients post to immunotherapy. Common treatment-related AEs were AST increase (62.5%), ALT increase (50.0%), nausea (50.0%), leukopenia (37.5%), fatigue (37.5%), vomiting (37.5%), hypoesthesia (25.0%), alopecia (25.0%), and neutropenia (25.0%). Most of these AE were Grade 1 or 2. The AE of Grade 3 was neutropenia (12.5%). The SAE was CPK increased (12.5%). Conclusions: The study showed that RC48-ADC was safety and the ORR was 25% in HER-negative patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Clinical trial information: NCT04073602.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. e1838-e1839
Author(s):  
A. Rodriguez-Vida ◽  
S. Feyerabend ◽  
Y. Loriot ◽  
A. Necchi ◽  
S. Gupta ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document