Are Level 3 Fair Value Gains and Losses Return Relevant? Evidence from Fas 157 Rollforward Disclosures

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Fiechter ◽  
Zoltán Novotny-Farkas ◽  
Annelies Renders
Keyword(s):  
Fair Value ◽  
Relevant Evidence ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Fas 157 ◽  
Gains And Losses

scholarly journals Credit Crisis with Focus on Level Three Valuations and FAS 157: Analysis and Recommendations for Change

2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 255
Author(s):  
Arber Hoti
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Credit Crisis ◽  
Current Crisis ◽  
Market Conditions ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Fas 157 ◽  
Value Measurement ◽  
Fair Value Measurements

The paper examines the effect of level three valuations and FAS 157 implications on investors, auditors’ work, valuation disclosures and gives recommendations for improvements based on best practices. The aim of this research is to demonstrate that the fair value measurements should not be suspended. The standards provide for measurement of fair value in all market conditions. Therefore, level 3 measurements or mark-to-model is an answer for many issuers that are not sure how to measure their assets and liabilities at the fair value. The paper concludes that fair value measurement has not caused the current crisis and has no pro-cyclical effect and suggests several recommendations for policy makers and regulators. 

Do Investors Perceive Marking-to-Model as Marking-to-Myth? Early Evidence from FAS 157 Disclosure

2019 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
pp. 1950005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalin S. Kolev
Keyword(s):  
Stock Price ◽  
Positive Association ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Market Prices ◽  
Early Evidence ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Fas 157 ◽  
Net Assets ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 2

Capitalizing on the disclosure mandated by FAS 157, I examine the equity market’s perception of the reliability of internally generated fair value estimates. For the sample of S&P 1,500 financial institutions for the first three quarters of 2008, I document a significantly positive association between stock price and fair values measured using unadjusted market prices (FAS 157 Level 1), other observable inputs (Level 2), and significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), with valuation coefficients generally increasing in the observability of the measurement inputs. Using the reconciliation of the change in Level 3 net assets, I then directly examine the periodic re-measurement of the fair value estimates and document a significantly positive association between Level 3 net gains and quarterly returns. This result manifests even among observations with thin capital cushion, poorer information environment, and weaker corporate governance. Collectively, the findings are consistent with the conjecture that investors perceive the management-provided, mark-to-model, fair value estimates sufficiently reliable to use in firm valuation and do not discard them as “markings-to-myth.”

Are Level 3 Fair Value Remeasurements Useful? Evidence from FAS 157 Rollforward Disclosures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Fiechter ◽  
Zoltán Novotny-Farkas ◽  
Annelies Renders
Keyword(s):  
Fair Value ◽  
Regulatory Capital ◽  
Accounting Standard ◽  
Comprehensive Income ◽  
Other Comprehensive Income ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Fas 157

Exploiting detailed disclosures mandated by Accounting Standard Codification (ASC) 820, we provide evidence for the return relevance of Level 3 fair value remeasurements for a comprehensive sample of U.S. listed banks. We find that Level 3 remeasurements recognized in earnings are more return relevant than those recognized in other comprehensive income (OCI). Our results suggest that Level 3 remeasurements in OCI partially reflect transitory illiquidity discounts that are less relevant when banks have the ability to hold the underlying assets. The regulatory capital treatment of OCI also affects the return relevance of Level 3 remeasurements in OCI. Importantly, we find no differences in the return relevance of realized versus unrealized Level 3 remeasurements in earnings, allaying concerns that investors perceive unrealized Level 3 remeasurements of lesser quality. Overall, our findings support the usefulness of the segregated disclosures of Level 3 fair value remeasurements.

An Anatomy of the Level 3 Fair Value Hierarchy's Discount

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuel Bagna ◽  
Giuseppe Di Martino ◽  
Davide Rossi
Keyword(s):  
Fair Value ◽  
Level 3

scholarly journals Valuation Implications of FAS 159 Reported Gains and Losses From Fair Value Accounting for Liabilities

2021 ◽  
pp. 0148558X2110178
Author(s):  
Sung Gon Chung ◽  
Cheol Lee ◽  
Gerald J. Lobo ◽  
Kevin Ow Yong
Keyword(s):  
Stock Returns ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Negative Association ◽  
Financial Accounting ◽  
Fair Value Accounting ◽  
Economic Implications ◽  
Current Period ◽  
Gains And Losses

This study examines the economic implications of fair value liability gains and losses arising from the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 (hereafter, FAS 159). We find a positive correspondence between a firm’s FAS 159 fair value liability gains and losses and current period stock returns, consistent with the notion that these gains and losses are priced by equity investors. However, further analysis indicates that fair value gains and losses from liabilities have a statistically significant negative association with future returns, suggesting that investors misprice this earnings component and subsequently correct the mispricing. We also find that the negative association for fair value gains is stronger for firms with lower levels of institutional ownership.

scholarly journals Fair Value Accounting and Earnings Management Using LLP and Realized Gains and Losses: Study in Banking Industry Listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-137
Author(s):  
Ice Maria Ulfa ◽  
Bambang Subroto ◽  
Zaki Baridwan
Keyword(s):  
Earnings Management ◽  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Banking Industry ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Fair Value Accounting ◽  
Loan Loss ◽  
Trade Off ◽  
Gains And Losses ◽  
The Impact

Abstract: Fair Value Accounting and Earnings Management Using LLP and Realized Gains and Losses: Study in Banking Industry Listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange. This study examines whether earnings management can be limited by the implementation of fair value accounting in banking industry. The main contribution of this study is  providing provide empirical evidence about the impact of fair value accounting on earnings management in Indonesia. Earnings management is proxied by loan loss provision (LLP), the realized of gains and losses, and the trade-off between realized gains and losses and LLP following Bratten et al (2013). The study provides empirical evidence that earnings management is still performed by banks, by using LLP, realized gains and losses and also occurs trade-off between LLP and realized gains and losses as means to perform earnings management in accordance with the needs of management. If banks are exposed to fair value accounting, managers will have more flexibility in reporting banks’ financial performance to present a desired earning, by  providing them with additional earning managements tools. These findings can be informative for policymakers, banking practitioners, and academics.  Keywords: earnings management, fair value accounting, LLP, realized gains and losses, trade-off LLP and realized gains and losses.Abstrak: Akuntansi Nilai Wajar dan Manajemen Laba menggunakan CKPN dan Realized Gains and Losses: Studi pada Industri Perbankan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Studi ini bertujuan untuk meneliti apakah manajemen laba dapat dibatasi oleh penerapan akuntansi nilai wajar dalam industri perbankan. Kontribusi dari penelitian ini adalah untuk memberikan bukti empiris tentang dampak penerapan akuntansi nilai wajar pada manajemen laba di Indonesia. Manajemen laba diproksikan oleh cadangan kerugian penurunan nilai (CKPN), realized of gains and losses, dan trade-off antara realized of gains and losses dan CKPN mengikuti model penelitian Bratten et al (2013). Studi ini memberikan bukti empiris bahwa manajemen laba masih dilakukan oleh bank menggunakan CKPN, realized of gains and losses dan juga terjadi trade-off antara CKPN dan realized of gains and losses sebagai sarana manajemen laba sesuai dengan kebutuhan manajemen. Konsekuensi dari paparan bank terhadap akuntansi nilai wajar dapat meningkatkan fleksibilitas manajer dalam melaporkan penghasilan yang diinginkan dengan memberikan mereka alat manajemen laba. Temuan-temuan tersebut dapat bersifat informatif bagi pembuat kebijakan, anggota industri perbankan, dan akademisi. Kata kunci: manajemen laba, akuntansi nilai wajar, CKPN, realized gains and losses, trade-off CKPN dan realized gains and losses.

Fair Value Accounting and Earnings Persistence: Evidence from International Banks

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daifei (Troy) Yao ◽  
Majella Percy ◽  
Jenny Stewart ◽  
Fang Hu
Keyword(s):  
Strong Association ◽  
Balance Sheet ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Institutional Factors ◽  
Earnings Persistence ◽  
Legal Enforcement ◽  
International Banks ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Fair Value Measurements ◽  
Level 2

ABSTRACT Using hand-collected data from a sample of 210 international banks during the period 2009 to 2013, we investigate whether fair value exposure, the proportion of financial assets measured at fair values, is associated with earnings persistence and whether the reliability of fair value measurements influences earnings persistence. We also examine whether the association between fair value measurements and earnings persistence is a function of institutional factors such as legal enforcement, the audit environment, and country-level auditor industry expertise. Results suggest that the use of fair values for balance sheet financial instruments enhances earnings persistence. Also, we find that the nondiscretionary fair value Level 1 assets (measured with observable inputs) are positively associated with earnings persistence, whereas the Level 2 assets (measured with indirectly observable inputs) and Level 3 assets (measured using unobservable inputs) are not associated with earnings persistence. We provide further evidence that there is a strong association between factors reflecting countrywide institutional structures and the predictive power of fair values based on discretionary measurement inputs (Level 2 and Level 3 assets) and we find that the moderating effect from these institutional factors is greater for Level 3 assets than for Level 2 assets. Additional tests suggest that the association between fair value estimates and earnings persistence is moderated by the classification of fair value assets (that is, through profit and loss versus other comprehensive income) and the reliability of fair value estimates.

Fair value accounting, earnings management, and the case of bargain purchase gain

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-253
Author(s):  
Steven Lilien ◽  
Bharat Sarath ◽  
Yan Yan
Keyword(s):  
Design Methodology ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Fair Value Accounting ◽  
Market Returns ◽  
Accounting Earnings ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Accounting Earnings Management

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the association between bargain purchase gains (BPGs) booked by the acquirer and smoothing of acquirers’ earning performance across time. Design/methodology/approach The authors use a sample of 122 bargain purchase acquisitions in non-financial industries from 2009 to 2012 and a pair-match control group of 122 goodwill acquisitions. Findings The authors find that BPGs, and in particular, the Level-3 fair value estimates of intangible assets acquired, have consistently been used to smooth earnings but that such smoothing activities are not associated with long-term market returns. Originality/value This study is the first one to investigate bargain purchase acquisitions in a broad range of non-financial industries and suggests that managers are using the valuation of intangibles to avoid unfavorable earnings even though these valuations are not credible to investors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document