Kurumsal ve İlişkisel Ekonomik Coğrafya Yaklaşımları ve İşlemselleştirilmesi (Institutional and Relational Economic Geography Approaches and Their Operationalization)

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suat Tüysüz
Keyword(s):  
Economic Geography ◽  
Relational Economic Geography

Policy Mobility

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas A. Phelps
Keyword(s):  
Economic Geography ◽  
Economic Implications ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Relational Economic Geography

This chapter teases out some of the economic implications of the economy in between cities and nations associated with policy mobility. The subject of policy mobility is one that signals a relational economic geography. It embodies the tension between the fixity and mobility of capital, between sedentarist and nomadic perspectives in geography. Yet it cannot be reduced to one or other in these sets of antimonies. The chapter charts some of the history of policy mobility before noting the importance of the transnational economic actors and interests that drive contemporary policy mobility. It considers the nature of policy mobility in strong and weak forms of inter-urban competition.

scholarly journals Toward a relational economic geography

2003 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Bathelt ◽  
J. Gluckler
Keyword(s):  
Economic Geography ◽  
Relational Economic Geography

scholarly journals Toward a relational economic geography

Economy ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. 73-100
Author(s):  
Harald Bathelt ◽  
Johannes Glückler
Keyword(s):  
Economic Geography ◽  
Relational Economic Geography

scholarly journals Listening to the buzz: Exploring the link between firm creation and regional innovative atmosphere as reflected by social media

2021 ◽  
pp. 0308518X2110566
Author(s):  
Carlo Corradini ◽  
Emma Folmer ◽  
Anna Rebmann
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Big Data ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Economic Geography ◽  
Knowledge Exchange ◽  
Discursive Practices ◽  
Firm Creation ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Relational Economic Geography

This paper presents a novel approach to capture ‘buzz’, the vibrancy and knowledge exchange propensity of localised informal communication flows. Building on a conceptual framework based on relational economic geography, we argue the content of buzz may allow to probe into the character of places and investigate what is ‘in the air’ within regional entrepreneurial milieux. In particular, we analyse big data to listen for the presence of buzz about innovation – defined by discursive practices that reflect an innovative atmosphere – and explore how this may influence regional firm creation. Using information from 180 million geolocated Tweets comprising almost two billion words across NUTS3 regions in the UK for the year 2014, our results offer novel evidence, robust to different model specifications, that regions characterised by a relatively higher intensity of discussion and vibrancy around topics related to innovation may provide a more effective set of informal resources for sharing and recombination of ideas, defining regional capabilities to support and facilitate entrepreneurial processes. The findings contribute to the literature on the intangible dimensions in the geography of innovation and offer new insights on the potential of natural language processing for economic geography research.

Zur Bedeutung von Ressourcen in der relationalen Wirtschaftsgeographie

2003 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Glückler ◽  
Harald Bathelt
Keyword(s):  
Economic Geography ◽  
Regional Differences ◽  
Central Importance ◽  
Cluster Development ◽  
Firm Strategies ◽  
Or Groups ◽  
Institutional Structures ◽  
Interactive Nature ◽  
Relational Concept ◽  
Relational Economic Geography

The importance of resources in relational economic geography: From substantive concepts towards a relational perspective. In this paper, we aim to show that resources are of central importance in relational economic geography. Resources are constituted in a relational way in two aspects. First, resources are relational in that their generation, interpretation and use is contingent. This depends on the institutional structures and social interaction, as well as the knowledge contexts and mental models of the agents involved. Second, some types of resources, such as power and social capital, are also relational in that they cannot be possessed or controlled by individual agents. They are being built and mobilized through day-to-day social practices. Only the returns, and not the resources themselves, can be attributed to agents or groups of agents. We conclude that a relational concept of resources reflects the contextual and interactive nature of the selection, use and formation of resources. This offers new insights into the explanation of heterogeneity in firm strategies and trajectories, as well as regional differences in cluster development.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document