Relationship Student Attitude, Learning Independence, and Learning Style with Learning Outcomes

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isti Komah ◽  
Osly Usman
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Student Attitude ◽  
Attitude Learning

THE INFLUENCE OF STUDENTS LEARNING STYLE AND LEARNING INTEREST ON THE LEARNING OUTCOMES OF PHYSICS CLASS X IPA DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 132-143
Author(s):  
Albert Lumbu ◽  
Bonefasius Y Boy ◽  
Muhamad Akbar
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Significant Influence ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Physics Learning ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Pearson Correlation Test ◽  
Learning Interest ◽  
Learning Together

This study aims to determine whether there are: 1) the influence of learning styles on physics learning outcomes, 2) the influence of interest in learning on physics learning outcomes, 3) the influence of learning styles and interest in learning together on physics learning outcomes in class X SMA Negeri 1 Nimboran . This research was conducted at SMA Negeri 1 Nimboran in April - May 2021. The subjects in this study were all 52 students of class X majoring in science and the objects of research were learning styles, interest in learning and physics learning outcomes. The instruments used are questionnaires and documentation. Data analysis was carried out using the Pearson correlation test with a significance level of 0.05 and a regression test which resulted in conclusions as a result of the study. The results showed that, 1) there was a significant influence of learning style on physics learning outcomes with a contribution of 50.8%, 2) there was a significant influence of interest in learning on physics learning outcomes with a contribution of 60.9%, 3) there were significant influence of learning style and interest in learning, together on the learning outcomes of physics with a contribution of 64.3% influence

scholarly journals Sistem Pakar Diagnosa Sikap dan Gaya Belajar untuk Menerapkan Akhlakul Karimah pada Siswa

2019 ◽  
pp. 35-40
Author(s):  
K Kadrahman ◽  
S Sumijan ◽  
Y Yuhandri
Keyword(s):  
Expert System ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Human Activity ◽  
Student Attitudes ◽  
Student Attitude ◽  
Data Accuracy ◽  
Forward Chaining ◽  
Use Of Technology

Expert system is one of the use of technology in supporting every human activity. One of the uses of the expert system is for education. The expert system will help teachers to analyze the attitudes displayed by students. The purpose of this study is to analyze the attitudes and learning styles of students, apply good moral methods to students and determine the type of good approach to students using the Forward chaining method. The data needed for this research is student attitude data, data on learning style types, and moral data of morality and data on solutions to the application of morality and character. This research resulted in a solution in the form of the method of moral lighting according to the learning style with data accuracy of 86.2%. The conclusion of this study is that the design of an expert system for diagnosing student attitudes makes it easier for teachers to approach students.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TSTS–NHT DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENGANTAR BISNIS

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 88
Author(s):  
Mendarissan Aritonang ◽  
Abdul Hamid K ◽  
Julaga Situmorang
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Business Students ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan :(1) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TST lebih tinggi dari mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT. (2) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar  pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis dan mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis. (3) Untuk mengetahui interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  terhadap hasil belajar pengantar bisnis. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di Universitas Methodist Indonesia. Populasi berjumlah 180 orang. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian kuasi eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2 x 2 dilanjutkan dengan statistik inferensial dengan menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur dengan taraf signifikan α = 0,05 yang dilanjutkan dengan uji Scheffe. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT; (2) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis; (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar mahasiswa.  Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran kooperatif, TST, NHT, gaya belajar, pengantar bisnis.  Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the TST type are higher than students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the NHT type. (2) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who have theoretical learning styles and students who have pragmatic learning styles. (3) To determine the interaction between cooperative learning models with learning styles on introductory business learning outcomes. This research was conducted at the Methodist University of Indonesia. The population is 180 people. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling. Quasi-experimental research method with 2 x 2 factorial design followed by inferential statistics using two-way ANAVA with a significant level α = 0.05 followed by the Scheffe test. The results showed: (1) the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the cooperative learning model type TSTS were higher than the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the NHT type cooperative learning model; (2) the results of introductory business learning students who have theoretical learning styles are higher than the results of introductory business learning students who have pragmatic learning styles; (3) there is an interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles in influencing student learning outcomes. Keywords: cooperative learning model, TST, NHT, learning style, business introduction.

scholarly journals Komparasi model pembelajaran earth science community dan grup investigasi pada scientific approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-125
Author(s):  
Jailani Husain Saleh ◽  
Muhsinatun Siasah Masruri
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Earth Science ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Cognitive Aspect ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Science Community ◽  
The Difference

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk (1) menguji perbedaan hasil belajar model earth science community dan group investigation (GI); (2) menguji perbedaan hasil belajar model earth science community dan GI pada siswa dengan gaya belajar visual; (3) menguji perbedaan hasil belajar model earth science community dan GI pada siswa dengan gaya belajar auditorial;  dan (4) menguji interaksi pengaruh antara model pembelajaran dan gaya belajar siswa terhadap hasil belajar geografi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuasi eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2x2. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa SMA Negeri di Kota Kupang yang tersebar pada 12 sekolah. Teknik sampling yang digunakan adalah Simple Random Sampling dan terpilih 2 sekolah sebagai subjek penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) tidak terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar model earth science community dan GI pada aspek kognitif  dengan p = 0,374 > 0,05; pada aspek afektif dengan p = 0,645 > 0,05, dan pada aspek psikomotor dengan p = 0,969 > 0,05; (2) terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar model earth science community dan GI pada siswa dengan gaya belajar visual, pada aspek kognitif dengan p = 0,009 < 0,05; pada aspek afektif dengan p = 0,014 < 0,05 dan pada aspek psikomotor dengan p = 0,024 < 0,05;  (3) terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar model earth science community dan GI pada siswa dengan gaya belajar auditorial, pada aspek kognitif dengan p = 0,042 < 0,05; pada aspek afektif dengan p = 0,026 < 0,05 dan pada aspek psikomotor dengan  p = 0,017 < 0,05; (4) terdapat interaksi pengaruh model pembelajaran dan gaya belajar siswa terhadap hasil belajar geografi, pada aspek kognitif dengan p = 0,008 < 0,05, pada aspek afektif  dengan p = 0,004 < 0,05 dan pada aspek psikomotor dengan p = 0,006 < 0,05. AbstractThis study aims to test: (1) the difference in the learning outcomes through the earth science community and group investigation (GI) models, (2) the difference in the learning outcomes through the earth science community and GI models among students with the visual learning style, (3) the difference in the learning outcomes through the earth science community and GI models among students with the auditory learning style, and (4) the interaction of the effects of the learning models and the students’ learning styles on the geography learning outcomes. The study employed the quasi-experimental method with a 2x2 factorial design. The research population comprised all students of state senior high schools (SHSs) in Kupang city in 12 schools. The sampling technique was the simple random sampling technique and 2 schools were selected as the research subjects. The results of the study are as follows. (1) There is no difference in the learning outcomes between the students learning through the earth science community and GI models in the cognitive aspect with p = 0.374 > 0.05, in the affective aspect with p = 0.645 > 0.05, and in the psychomotor aspect with p = 0.969 > 0.05.(2) There is difference in the learning outcome through the earth science community and GI models among the students with the visual learning style in the cognitive aspect with p = 0.009  < 0.05, in the affective aspect with p = 0.014 < 0.05, and in the psychomotor aspect with p = 0.024 < 0.05. (3) There is difference in the learning outcome through the earth science community and GI models among the students with the visual learning style in the cognitive aspect with p = 0.042 < 0.05, in the affective aspect with p = 0.026 < 0.05, and in the psychomotor aspect with p = 0.017 < 0.05.(4) There is  interaction of the effects of the learning models and the students’ learning styles on the geography learning outcomes in the cognitive aspect with p = 0.008 < 0.05, in the affective aspect with p = 0.004  < 0.05, and in the psychomotor aspect with p = 0.006 < 0.05.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MOTIVASI BELAJAR, GAYA BELAJAR, DAN LINGKUNGAN BELAJAR PADA HASIL BELAJAR EKONOMI DI SMA NEGERI 1 WRINGINANOM GRESIK

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 142
Author(s):  
Muhammad Miftah Farid
Keyword(s):  
Linear Regression ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Regression Techniques

This study aims to analyze the influence of learning motivation, learning styles and learning environments on learning outcomes economy partially or simultaneously. The population in this study is IPS students a total of 314 people and a total sample of 153 students in SMA Negeri 1 Wringinanom Gresik. The data collection techniques used were questionnaires and documentation. Analysis method using multiple linear regression techniques. The results showed that the learning motivation, learning style and learning environment partially positive significant effect on learning outcomes. Learning motivation, learning style and the learning environment simultaneously positive significant effect on learning outcomes

scholarly journals Komparasi Tingkat Hasil Belajar Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditorial, dan Kinestetik

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-48
Author(s):  
Nastiti ◽  
Wahyu Rika Agustin
Keyword(s):  
Social Studies ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Ex Post ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Good Learning

The purpose of the study was to determine whether there was a difference between learning outcomes based on VAK learning styles (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) in Integrated Social Studies subjects for seventh grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Patianrowo. Researchers used a comparative quantitative approach with a comparative causal design or ex post facto. The population in the study were all students of class VII, amounting to 295 students and the sample was 59 students taken from class VII H and I. The sample was taken using simple random sampling technique. The study used a questionnaire and documentation as data collection instruments. While the data analysis technique used kruskal wallis. The results showed that good learning outcomes based on visual learning styles were 20%, low learning outcomes were 60%, and moderate learning outcomes were 20%. Furthermore, good learning outcomes based on auditory learning styles are 68%, low learning outcomes are 3%, and moderate learning outcomes are 29%. Finally, good kinesthetic learning outcomes are 22%, low learning outcomes are 73%, and low learning outcomes are 5%. Based on these results, it can be concluded that there is a significant difference in learning outcomes based on learning styles using the VAK learning style in Integrated Social Studies subjects class VII SMP Negeri 1 Patianrowo. This can be seen from the sig value. namely 0.000 <from the significance level of 5% (0.05).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document