Forest Owner Objectives Typologies: Instruments for Each Owner Type or Instruments for Most Owner Types?

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Danley
2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 290-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liina Häyrinen ◽  
Osmo Mattila ◽  
Sami Berghäll ◽  
Anne Toppinen

While the behavior and objectives of non-industrial private forest (NIPF) owners have been studied extensively, studies that systematically test the underlying measurement model are lacking in forest economic literature. Our paper reports the results obtained from a recent large-scale survey conducted in Finland in 2011 (n = 557). Results indicate a novel way to systematically analyze the objectives of forest ownership by testing the validity of the developed measurement scale using the structural equations modeling technique. From an exploratory factor analysis of 22 items measuring forest owner objectives, a four-dimensional structure is identified in the background objectives of NIPF owners. These dimensions are labeled as recreation and leisure time, sense of economic security, nature conservation and aesthetics, and timber sales income objective. Having undergone a confirmatory testing process, results from the four-dimensional model support the validity of the developed 16-item measurement model. Based on these findings, we argue that the logical NIPF owner objective structure in Finland consists of experiential forest value, as perceived in current and future time contexts, as well as of current and future economic objectives. As the theoretical structure divides forest owner objectives into the evaluation of the present objectives, supplemented with a psychological evaluation of the future objectives, a novel classification of NIPF owner objectives is suggested.


2009 ◽  
Vol 160 (8) ◽  
pp. 228-231
Author(s):  
Hansruedi Walther

A forest owner can only commercialize non-wood products and services within a tightly restricted market niche. On account of free access being permitted to the forest it is impossible to deny to third parties the consumption of many non-wood products and services: everybody has the right to be in the forest for recreation. As a result many non-wood services cannot be commercialized by the forest owner, or not exclusively. What would seem unthinkable elsewhere on private property seems to be taken for granted in the forest: third parties may take products from the forest and even sell them without being the forest owners. For certain nonwood services or products, such as the installation of rope parks or for burial in the forest, the organizer must conclude an agreement with the forest owner or draw up a contract for servitude or benefit. In addition, for these activities a permit from the Forestry Department is necessary. On the other hand, for an itinerant school class or for the production of forest honey neither a binding regulation with the forest owner nor a permit from the Forestry service is necessary, provided that no constructions are erected in the forest. The only exclusive right which remains to the forest owner, besides the sale of his property, is the exploitation of his trees within the legal framework.


2020 ◽  
Vol 461 ◽  
pp. 117866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Petucco ◽  
Pablo Andrés-Domenech ◽  
Lilian Duband
Keyword(s):  

AMBIO ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustav Richnau ◽  
Per Angelstam ◽  
Sviataslau Valasiuk ◽  
Lyudmyla Zahvoyska ◽  
Robert Axelsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priit Põllumäe ◽  
Henn Korjus ◽  
Paavo Kaimre ◽  
Tarmo Vahter
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document