Development and Validation of a Predictive Risk Score for Screening Frailty in Veteran Health Administration Hospitalized Patients

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph C. Ward ◽  
Erin R. Weeda ◽  
David J. Taber ◽  
Robert N. Axon ◽  
Mulugeta Gebregziabher
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-94
Author(s):  
Gina Maiocco ◽  
Billie Vance ◽  
Toni Dichiacchio

Federal, state, and educational policy, as well as public and professional initiatives, should influence how care is delivered to veterans from non-Veteran Health Administration (VHA) advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) located in civilian health care facilities. Due to the MISSION Act, more veterans are receiving care outside the VHA, but little is known about the readiness of APRNs to address the needs of this population. This mixed-methods study describes the perceptions of 340 non-VHA APRNs concerning practice, clinical needs, and challenges they face while delivering care to veterans. Survey results show only 8% of APRNs consistently asked about military service; less than 1% asked if the patient has a family member with military history; and only 25% applied research by inquiring into military history when patients presented with conditions like chronic pain, interpersonal violence, or insomnia. Technology use via mobile application was minimally reported (<1%). “Missing in Action,” the overarching theme from qualitative data, included three subthemes: (a) absence facilitated collaboration with VHA, (b) concerns regarding personal competency in the care of the military person, and (c) lack of recognition of the significance of the need to know about military status. Practice implications proffered include implementation of mandatory inquiry into military service and enactment of APRN veteran-centric nursing competencies. Education actions involve updating graduate nursing programs to include veteran health content and increased policy awareness. Future research should encompass replication of this study in specific APRN roles and consist of ongoing evaluation of veteran care by the civilian sector as the MISSION Act is implemented.


2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 479-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Tisdale ◽  
Heather A. Jaynes ◽  
Joanna R. Kingery ◽  
Noha A. Mourad ◽  
Tate N. Trujillo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maya Aboumrad ◽  
Gabrielle Zwain ◽  
Jeremy Smith ◽  
Nabin Neupane ◽  
Ethan Powell ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Introduction Early identification of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who are at risk for hospitalization may help to mitigate disease burden by allowing healthcare systems to conduct sufficient resource and logistical planning in the event of case surges. We sought to develop and validate a clinical risk score that uses readily accessible information at testing to predict individualized 30-day hospitalization risk following COVID-19 diagnosis. Methods We assembled a retrospective cohort of U.S. Veterans Health Administration patients (age ≥ 18 years) diagnosed with COVID-19 between March 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020. We screened patient characteristics using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator logistic regression and constructed the risk score using characteristics identified as most predictive for hospitalization. Patients diagnosed before November 1, 2020, comprised the development cohort, while those diagnosed on or after November 1, 2020, comprised the validation cohort. We assessed risk score discrimination by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve and calibration using the Hosmer–Lemeshow (HL) goodness-of-fit test. This study was approved by the Veteran’s Institutional Review Board of Northern New England at the White River Junction Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Reference no.:1473972-1). Results The development and validation cohorts comprised 11,473 and 12,970 patients, of whom 4,465 (38.9%) and 3,669 (28.3%) were hospitalized, respectively. The independent predictors for hospitalization included in the risk score were increasing age, male sex, non-white race, Hispanic ethnicity, homelessness, nursing home/long-term care residence, unemployed or retired status, fever, fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, cough, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Model discrimination and calibration was good for the development (AUROC = 0.80; HL P-value = .05) and validation (AUROC = 0.80; HL P-value = .31) cohorts. Conclusions The prediction tool developed in this study demonstrated that it could identify patients with COVID-19 who are at risk for hospitalization. This could potentially inform clinicians and policymakers of patients who may benefit most from early treatment interventions and help healthcare systems anticipate capacity surges.


Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 397-P
Author(s):  
CHIN-LIN TSENG ◽  
ORYSYA SOROKA ◽  
CATHERINE E. MYERS ◽  
DAVID C. ARON ◽  
LEONARD M. POGACH

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document