Note: Individually Focused Deterrence: A Proposed Incentives-Based Non- Prosecution Strategy for Second Chances and its Constitutional Hurdles

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Levy
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony A. Braga ◽  
David Weisburd ◽  
Brandon Turchan

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-302
Author(s):  
Janese L. Free

This study explores the strategies youth violence prevention workers (YVPWs) employ to intervene in the lives of at-risk youth. Data drawn from 47 in-depth interviews with YVPWs in a large city in the northeastern United States revealed five main strategies they use to reduce violence, namely (1) sharing information with other YVPWs, (2) collaborating and networking with the community, (3) “being a presence” and building relationships with clients, (4) responding to clients’ conflicts and crises, and (5) providing clients and their families with resources and advocacy. Focused deterrence theory and pulling levers strategy are used to explain the findings and policy and program recommendations are discussed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Vaughn ◽  
Christopher P. Salas-Wright ◽  
Brian B. Boutwell ◽  
Matt DeLisi ◽  
Mary P. Curtis

Despite a wealth of research finding that adolescents who carry handguns are involved in risky behaviors, there has been little exploration into the heterogeneity of this behavior. Using a pooled sample of 12- to 17-year-olds from the National Study on Drug Use and Health who report past-year handgun carrying ( N = 7,872), this study identified four subgroups of handgun carriers: low risk ( n = 3,831; 47.93%), alcohol and marijuana users ( n = 1,591; 20.16%), fighters ( n = 1,430; 19.40%), and severe externalizers ( n = 1,020, 12.51%). These subgroups differed on demographic, behavioral, and psychosocial characteristics. Findings are discussed in light of prevention and focused deterrence.


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Fox ◽  
Kenneth J. Novak

This research examines the impact of focused deterrence on homicide and gun violence in Kansas City, MO. In 2014, a coalition of police, prosecutors, city officials, researchers, and others implemented Kansas City No Violence Alliance, a focused deterrence violence reduction strategy. Using street-level intelligence and analysis, groups involved with violence were identified and notified of the consequences for future violent incidents. Leveraging existing social services, members opting for nonviolence were offered assistance. This study evaluates the impact on violence over 3 years of implementation. Using 2009–2016 police incident data on homicide (including group member involved homicide) and gun-involved aggravated assault, time series models were estimated to determine the effects of focused deterrence during 2014–2016. Analysis indicated that focused deterrence implementation resulted in an immediate reduction in homicides and gun-involved aggravated assaults. This effect began to diminish around the 12-month postintervention point. During the third year, overall and group member involved homicide numbers returned to preimplementation levels, and gun-involved aggravated assaults exceeded those levels. After achieving significant first-year reductions, despite robust implementation and fidelity, violence returned to preimplementation levels by the third year. Limitations to the focused deterrence model and the need for continuous evaluation and innovation are discussed.


Author(s):  
Anthony A. Braga

Thousands of Americans are killed by gunfire each year, and hundreds of thousands more are injured or threatened with guns in robberies and assaults. The burden of gun violence in urban areas is high and concentrated among a small number of criminally active people and occurs in a small number of places within cities. This chapter reviews varied criminal justice interventions to deny criminal access to firearms and reduce criminal possession, carrying, and use of firearms. The research suggests that criminals acquire guns from a variety of sources including illegal diversions from legitimate firearms commerce. While more evaluation evidence is needed, supply-side interventions are promising in reducing criminal access to firearms. The evaluation evidence on the effects of sentencing enhancements on gun crime is mixed. A growing body of research evidence shows that hot spots policing programs and focused deterrence strategies to control repeat gun offenders can reduce gun violence.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 205-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony A. Braga ◽  
David Weisburd ◽  
Brandon Turchan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document