Summarizing Articles about Corporate Governance and International Financial Reporting Standards

Author(s):  
Khulood Alsaffar
2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Melis

This paper analyses and discusses the “positive” issues of the overriding international financial reporting standards principle of “true and fair view” in connection with corporate governance mechanisms. The analysis is based on case study evidence. Empirical evidence from the Parmalat case with regards to the role of the information supply and demand side agents is analysed. This study provides evidence on how the relationship between corporate financial reporting and corporate governance mechanisms may influence the enforcement of the international financial reporting standards overriding principle of “true and fair view”. Evidence is found that the enforcement of the “true and fair view” principle is intrinsically flawed when the accountability and the overall corporate governance systems do not work properly. Some evidence is also found for the argument that a lack in the quality of information supplied by the corporate financial system hurdles the role information demand side agents as effective monitors.


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daw Tin Hla ◽  
Abu Hassan bin Md Isa

Malaysia and Singapore are the top two successful economies in the ASEAN region. They are converging their national accounting standards with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) in an attempt to be more globalised. The globalisation of financial reporting standard is not just accounting focus but also for enhancing the quality and transparency of financial reporting of the firms in these countries. Investors and the other stakeholders rely on financial information reported by the firms on their websites to enable the information to access globally. This study focuses on the globalisation of financial reporting standards, corporate governance and transparency practice by the firms listed on Bursa Malaysia and Singapore. It is to analyse the level of financial reporting quality of the firms in compliance with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in their annual reports by using disclosure analysis. Additionally, it determines the association between the financial reporting quality with IFRS compliance, and corporate governance and transparency practice of the firms listed on the main markets of Bursa Malaysia and main board of Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX), using multiple regression analysis. The finding of this study highlights the association of higher level of financial reporting quality with IFRS compliance of the firms, and their good corporate governance and transparency practice are positively associated in these two countries. This study also provides some opportunities to achieve sustainable convergence with the International Financial Reporting Standards of the firms by improving corporate governance and transparency in ASEAN countries.Keywords: International Financial Reporting Standards; Corporate Governance; Transparency and Disclosure Practice; Malaysia and Singapore.


2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 1851
Author(s):  
Eun Sil Choi ◽  
Chang Seop Rhee

We investigate the impact of Chief Executive Officer (CEO) changes on International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) reconciliation. Since January 1st, 2011 all Korean listed companies are required to adopt IFRS in their separate and consolidated accounts. To aid investors in evaluating corporate performance over time, the companies must restate the K-GAAP financial statements for 2010 under IFRS. We find that negative IFRS reconciliation is more frequent for firms with CEO turnover in 2011. The result suggests that new CEOs have an incentive to report lower earnings through IFRS reconciliation for the purpose of big bath. Additionally, in order to examine whether new CEOs incentive of the negative IFRS reconciliation is existed in different corporate governance levels, we classify the companies into strong and weak corporate governance. From the test, we find that their incentive of negative IFRS reconciliation is disappeared (existed) in the companies with strong (weak) corporate governance. This study will contribute to academics and disclosure-related practitioners by providing valuable information of the CEO incentive regarding IFRS reconciliation. We believe that our empirical evidence will be helpful to market participants when they make a business decisions in case of CEO turnover.


2005 ◽  
Vol 79 (9) ◽  
pp. 447-453
Author(s):  
Hans Blokdijk

De International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) die thans worden ingevoerd, vereisen dat jaarrekeningen voortaan worden opgemaakt op grondslagen die veel meer toekomstgericht zijn dan thans gebruikelijk. Dit leidt tot een conceptueel tweeslachtig document. Dat beïnvloedt weer het afleggen en afnemen van verantwoording in het kader van corporate governance, waarvoor een jaarrekening op basis van historische kosten een betere basis biedt. Ook het werk van de controlerend accountant wordt hierdoor beïnvloed, waarbij de nieuwe onafhankelijkheidsregels een complicerende rol spelen. De oorzaak is gelegen in regelgeving uit drie verschillende bronnen, die niet met elkaar harmoniëren.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document