A Novel Ileocolonic Crohn's Staging Tool: The Development and Validation of an Evidence-Based, End-User Informed Radiological Decision-Aid

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pritesh Morar ◽  
Karin Wasmann ◽  
Ana C.T. Fareleira ◽  
Kapil Sahnan ◽  
Samuel O. Adegbola ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S249-S249
Author(s):  
P S Morar ◽  
K A Wasmann ◽  
A C T Fareleira ◽  
K Sahnan ◽  
S O Adegbola ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabrielle Rocque ◽  
Ellen Miller-Sonnet ◽  
Alan Balch ◽  
Carrie Stricker ◽  
Josh Seidman ◽  
...  

Although recognized as best practice, regular integration of shared decision-making (SDM) approaches between patients and oncologists remains an elusive goal. It is clear that usable, feasible, and practical tools are needed to drive increased SDM in oncology. To address this goal, we convened a multidisciplinary collaborative inclusive of experts across the health-care delivery ecosystem to identify key principles in designing and testing processes to promote SDM in routine oncology practice. In this commentary, we describe 3 best practices for addressing challenges associated with implementing SDM that emerged from a multidisciplinary collaborative: (1) engagement of diverse stakeholders who have interest in SDM, (2) development and validation of an evidence-based SDM tool grounded within an established conceptual framework, and (3) development of the necessary roadmap and consideration of the infrastructure needed for engendering patient engagement in decision-making. We believe these 3 principles are critical to the success of creating SDM tools to be utilized both within and outside of clinical practice. We are optimistic that shared use across settings will support adoption of this tool and overcome barriers to implementing SDM within busy clinical workflows. Ultimately, we hope that this work will offer new perspectives on what is important to patients and provide an important impetus for leveraging patient preferences and values in decision-making.


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. e12617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ai Tomotaki ◽  
Hiroki Fukahori ◽  
Ikuko Sakai ◽  
Kana Kurokohchi

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 18-22
Author(s):  
Jamie Saragossi

BMJ Best Practice is an evidence-based point of care tool that helps support clinical decisions by providing the latest and highest quality research available to clinicians. The target audience for this resource is anyone delivering health care services. Currently, BMJ Best Practice is available as an institutional subscription in the United States. The resource includes clinical summaries based on the latest evidence, drug information, clinical calculators, evidence-based tool kits, and patient leaflets. The content provided goes through a rigorous editorial process by expert reviewers who have been required to disclose any financial conflicts. This process can however be relatively time consuming therefore updates that do not pose an immediate harm to patient care could potentially take anywhere from 1 to 3 months to be reflected in the clinical topic overviews. Overall, the tools and content provided on the platform are reliable and easy to navigate for the end user.


2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 569-580
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Sanders ◽  
Carmen S. Spry ◽  
Cassandra L. Tellegen ◽  
James N. Kirby ◽  
Carol M. Metzler ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-61
Author(s):  
Jenny Stenberg ◽  
David Keane ◽  
Magnus Lindberg ◽  
Hans Furuland

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chava Ramspek ◽  
Wouter Verberne ◽  
Friedo Dekker ◽  
Willem Jan Bos ◽  
Merel Van Diepen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 1530-1536
Author(s):  
Rushad Patell ◽  
Paola Raska ◽  
Natalie Lee ◽  
Gina Luciano ◽  
Deborah J. DiNardo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document