scholarly journals Impulse Purchases, Gun Ownership and Homicides: Evidence from a Firearm Demand Shock

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Koenig ◽  
David Schindler
Keyword(s):  
Gun Ownership ◽  
Demand Shock ◽  
Impulse Purchases

scholarly journals Impulse Purchases, Gun Ownership, and Homicides: Evidence from a Firearm Demand Shock

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-45
Author(s):  
Christoph Koenig ◽  
David Schindler
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Gun Ownership ◽  
Homicide Rates ◽  
Demand Shock ◽  
Impulse Purchases

Abstract Do firearm purchase delay laws reduce aggregate homicide levels? Using variation from a 6-month countrywide gun demand shock in 2012/2013, we show that U.S. states with legislation preventing immediate handgun purchases experienced smaller increases in handgun sales. Our findings indicate that this is likely driven by comparatively lower purchases among impulsive consumers. We then demonstrate that states with purchase delays also witnessed comparatively 2% lower homicide rates during the same period. Further evidence shows that lower handgun sales coincided primarily with fewer impulsive assaults and points towards reduced acts of domestic violence.

"I stole it on impulse": Do impulse purchases instigate bad behavior?

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saar Bossuyt ◽  
Patrick Van Kenhove ◽  
Tine De Bock
Keyword(s):  
Impulse Purchases

Public opinion on gun policy by race and gun ownership status

2021 ◽  
pp. 106607
Author(s):  
Cassandra K. Crifasi ◽  
Julie A. Ward ◽  
Emma E. McGinty ◽  
Daniel W. Webster ◽  
Colleen L. Barry
Keyword(s):  
Public Opinion ◽  
Gun Ownership ◽  
Gun Policy ◽  
Ownership Status

Feminism and Firearms: Gun Ownership, Gun Carrying, and Women’s Empowerment

2021 ◽  
pp. 073112142110286
Author(s):  
Margaret S. Kelley
Keyword(s):  
Women's Empowerment ◽  
Women’S Empowerment ◽  
Feminist Identity ◽  
Gun Ownership ◽  
American Life ◽  
Self Defense ◽  
Gun Carrying ◽  
Gun Culture ◽  
The Relationship

In this article, I use the 2018 Guns in American Life Survey (GALS) to investigate the relationship between feminist identity, gun ownership, gun carrying, and women’s empowerment. Notably, while identifying as a feminist lessens the likelihood that a woman will own a gun, of women who own handguns, feminists are more likely to carry their guns all or most of the time. Past victimization is associated with ownership and carrying, confirming genuine concern by women about their safety. Finally, findings reveal that women are more empowered by guns than are men and the relationship is moderated by age. Results are discussed in light of the current American gun culture focused on self-defense and a carry mindset that some women develop as feminist culture in action.

scholarly journals Household gun ownership.

1999 ◽  
Vol 89 (9) ◽  
pp. 1442-1442
Author(s):  
R B Trent ◽  
J C Van Court ◽  
A N Kim
Keyword(s):  
Gun Ownership

MONETARY POLICY SWITCHING IN THE EURO AREA AND MULTIPLE STEADY STATES: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 1175-1188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Dufrénot ◽  
Guillaume A. Khayat
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Euro Area ◽  
European Central Bank ◽  
Empirical Investigation ◽  
Standard Assumption ◽  
Demand Shock ◽  
Liquidity Trap ◽  
European Central ◽  
Parameter Values ◽  
Policy Function

This paper investigates, in the case of the euro area, the standard assumption that the liquidity trap steady state, which arises from the existence of the zero lower bound on the nominal interest rate, is locally unstable. We show that the policy function of the European Central Bank (ECB) is described by a nonlinear Taylor rule. Then, using our estimations, we show that around the liquidity trap steady state the equilibrium is locally determinate for most plausible parameter values. Finally, we find that an inflation shock is more efficient than a demand shock to escape the liquidity trap steady state.

scholarly journals Brief use of a specific gun in a violent game does not affect attitudes towards that gun

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (11) ◽  
pp. 160310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Hilgard ◽  
Christopher R. Engelhardt ◽  
Bruce D. Bartholow
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
Video Games ◽  
Science Fiction ◽  
Real World ◽  
Political Party ◽  
Aggressive Behaviour ◽  
Product Placement ◽  
Gun Violence ◽  
Product Evaluations ◽  
Gun Ownership

Although much attention has been paid to the question of whether violent video games increase aggressive behaviour, little attention has been paid to how such games might encourage antecedents of gun violence. In this study, we examined how product placement, the attractive in-game presentation of certain real-world firearm brands, might encourage gun ownership, a necessary antecedent of gun violence. We sought to study how the virtual portrayal of a real-world firearm (the Bushmaster AR-15) could influence players' attitudes towards the AR-15 specifically and gun ownership in general. College undergraduates ( N  = 176) played one of four modified video games in a 2 (gun: AR-15 or science-fiction control) × 2 (gun power: strong or weak) between-subjects design. Despite collecting many outcomes and examining many potential covariates and moderators, experimental assignment did little to influence outcomes of product evaluations or purchasing intentions with regard to the AR-15. Attitudes towards public policy and estimation of gun safety were also not influenced by experimental condition, although these might have been better tested by comparison against a no-violence control condition. By contrast, gender and political party had dramatic associations with all outcomes. We conclude that, if product placement shapes attitudes towards firearms, such effects will need to be studied with stronger manipulations or more sensitive measures.

To Provide or Protect? Masculinity, Economic Precarity, and Protective Gun Ownership in the United States

2021 ◽  
pp. 073112142199840
Author(s):  
Tara D. Warner ◽  
Tara Leigh Tober ◽  
Tristan Bridges ◽  
David F. Warner
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Gender Gap ◽  
Well Being ◽  
The United States ◽  
Family Status ◽  
Gun Ownership ◽  
Attitudes And Behaviors ◽  
Masculinity Threat ◽  
Economic Well Being

Protection is now the modal motivation for gun ownership, and men continue to outnumber women among gun owners. While research has linked economic precarity (e.g., insecurity and anxiety) to gun ownership and attitudes, separating economic well-being from constructions of masculinity is challenging. In response to blocked economic opportunities, some gun owners prioritize armed protection, symbolically replacing the masculine role of “provider” with one associated with “protection.” Thus, understanding both persistently high rates of gun ownership in the United States (in spite of generally declining crime) alongside the gender gap in gun ownership requires deeper investigations into the meaning of guns in the United States and the role of guns in conceptualizations of American masculinity. We use recently collected crowdsourced survey data to test this provider-to-protector shift, exploring how economic precarity may operate as a cultural-level masculinity threat for some, and may intersect with marital/family status to shape gun attitudes and behaviors for both gun owners and nonowners. Results show that investments in stereotypical masculine ideals, rather than economic precarity, are linked to support for discourses associated with protective gun ownership and empowerment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document