scholarly journals Drivers of Market Liquidity - Regulation, Monetary Policy or New Players?

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clemens Bonner ◽  
Eward Brouwer ◽  
Iman <!>van Lelyveld
2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (02) ◽  
pp. 02-21
Author(s):  
Ly Tran Thi Hai

This study investigates the impact of monetary policy on liquidity of Vietnam’s stock market from September 2007 to November 2014. Time series of liquidity are determined by monthly liquidity data for 643 enterprises in the surveyed period. Two variables of the monetary policy, including growth in money supply and interbank rate, are employed in VAR model along with four different measures of market liquidity. The results show that unexpected variance in the two monetary policy variables has no significant impact on the market liquidity, which, in turn, may be improved by the positive shocks of market returns, inflation, and growth in industrial production. Market variance does produce certain effects, but discrepancies occur in the signs of various liquidity measures.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sînziana Kroon Petrescu ◽  
Clemens Bonner ◽  
Iman <!>van Lelyveld ◽  
Jan Wrampelmeyer

Subject Global liquidity trends. Significance Concerns over global liquidity have resurfaced since late 2014, both in advanced and emerging markets (EMs). Both central banks and the IMF note that market liquidity has declined, especially in bond markets, due to stricter regulations on derivatives trading in advanced economies, lower sovereign bonds demand in some countries and the end of the credit boom in some EMs. Global liquidity is a loosely defined concept that can be interpreted in different ways and covers a variety of countries and market realities. Impacts Liquidity is highly cyclical and follows a 'boom and bust' cycle. Accomodative monetary policy and financial regulation may partly offset the exposure to global liquidity volatility. US monetary policy tightening could exacerbate an EM crisis, where corporates have heavily issued dollar-denominated debt. The ECB monetary policy will remain accommodative until at least March 2017 partly offsetting risks of a global liquidity shortage.


2009 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 189-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruslan Y. Goyenko ◽  
Andrey D. Ukhov

AbstractThis paper establishes liquidity linkage between stock and Treasury bond markets. There is a lead-lag relationship between illiquidity of the two markets and bidirectional Granger causality. The effect of stock illiquidity on bond illiquidity is consistent with flight-to-quality or flight-to-liquidity episodes. Monetary policy impacts illiquidity. The evidence indicates that bond illiquidity acts as a channel through which monetary policy shocks are transferred into the stock market. These effects are observed across illiquidity of bonds of different maturities and are especially pronounced for illiquidity of short-term maturities. The paper provides evidence of illiquidity integration between stock and bond markets.


Author(s):  
Octavio Fernández-Amador ◽  
Martin Lukas Gächter ◽  
Martin Larch ◽  
Georg Peter

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J Curfman ◽  
John Kandrac

Abstract We investigate how liquidity regulations affect banks by examining a dormant monetary policy tool that functions as a liquidity regulation. For causal inference, we use a regression kink design that relies on the variation in a marginal high-quality liquid asset requirement around an exogenous threshold. We show that mandated increases in liquidity cause banks to reduce credit supply. Liquidity requirements also depress banks’ profitability, though some of the regulatory costs are passed on to liability holders. We document a prudential benefit of liquidity requirements by showing that banks subject to a higher requirement just before the financial crisis had lower odds of failure.


2020 ◽  
pp. 100860
Author(s):  
Marcelo Rezende ◽  
Mary-Frances Styczynski ◽  
Cindy M. Vojtech

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document