One Belt-One Road Infrastructure Investment: Motivations, Regional Imbalance and Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Models

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianze Zhang
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
pp. 11-18
Author(s):  
Dinara Atadjanova ◽  

This article examines the theoretical foundations and content of public-private partnership. It also presents the research of scientists who have analyzed the content, scientific basis and practical nature of public-private partnership. As a result of the research, the author gave an author definition of the concept of public-private partnership.Keywords: public, business entity, public-private partnership, public sector, infrastructure, investment, innovation, private partner.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Schuster ◽  
◽  
Joven Balbosa ◽  
Christine Tang ◽  
Takuji Komatzuzaki ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jude Mugurura ◽  
Zwelinzima Ndevu

Background: This article is based on a multidimensional empirical research study investigating aspects of the suitability of the public–private partnership environment of Uganda for road infrastructure development. The foundation of the article is the implementation of the relationship between existing legal and regulatory frameworks on the ground in Uganda.Aim: Key aspects and realities of the legal and policy frameworks that support public–private partnership, road investment projects and programmes in Uganda are examined from the perspective of a transparent, effective and efficient service delivery.Setting: A brief exposition of Uganda’s historical realities and present challenges, especially in terms of road infrastructure, an introduction of key aspects of the legal and regulatory frameworks is presented.Methods: The research is based on an exploratory research design methodology founded on a thorough literature review, exhaustive documentary analysis of primary and secondary sources and 30 interviews with senior and middle managers in the public and private sectors in Uganda. A semi-structured questionnaire was utilised.Results: The analysis of data was based on a dissection of the policies and systems as foundations of solid implementation, existing legal violations, the local private sector’s present conundrum and capacity gaps, the realities of integrity and corruption and the existing approach of citizens towards the problems and challenges.Conclusion: The lack of integrity in both the private and public sector has serious negative effects on the processes, functions, planning, designing, outputs and outcomes of infrastructure initiatives undertaken.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-120
Author(s):  
Towaf Totok Irawan

This study aims to formulate recommendations and opportunities for potential infrastructure development in the social sector by using KPBU scheme. The direct beneficiaries of this activity are the Deputy of Investment Planning as a unit that is directly responsible for formulating the proposed establishment of the Act related KPBU in the field of infrastructure investment. The output of this activity is also expected to be useful for investors in infrastructure and related stakeholders. Model cooperation Public Private Partnership in social infrastructure should take into account the uniqueness of each sector, particularly the constraints, risks and macro conditions, including fiscal policy and commitment to the objective of each sector. So that needs to be made cooperation mechanism Public Private Partnership in the field of social infrastructure by making adjustments to the conditions and limitations in the field of social infrastructure. Results and recommendations are discussed further in the paper. Keywords: Multi Criteria Analysis, infrastructure development


2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dwinanta Utama

Public Private Partnership (PPP), recently is becoming popular issue among stakeholders in infrastructure development in Indonesia. In other countries, infrastructure facilities such as Toll Road, Water Supply Network, Electricity Power,  Harbour, Airport, Health Services, and Education have already been using PPP scheme. PPP is needed due to the limitation of government budget, infrastructure life time based on the quantity and the quality, and also the private sector skill/technology capability. In term of infrastructure quality competitiveness, based on the survey resulted in the World Competitiveness Report 2008-2009, showed that Indonesia is on the 96th rank among 134 countires surveyed. It can be argued that Indonesian infrastructure quality is still low in comparison to the other South East Asian Countries, even from its neighborhood countries. Government budget for infrastructure investment including transportation in 2010-2014 is very limited namely around 32% including from bilateral and multilateral loan. Therefore the 62% government budget remains must be fulfilled by another scheme such as Public Private Partnership.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document