scholarly journals Forward-Reserve Storage Strategies with Order Picking: When Do They Pay O ff?

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wan Wu ◽  
M.B.M. René de Koster ◽  
Yugang Yu
Keyword(s):  
Order Picking ◽  
Reserve Storage

scholarly journals Forward-reserve storage strategies with order picking: When do they pay off?

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (9) ◽  
pp. 961-976
Author(s):  
Wan Wu ◽  
René B.M. de Koster ◽  
Yugang Yu
Keyword(s):  
Order Picking ◽  
Reserve Storage

scholarly journals Towards a conceptualisation of Order Picking 4.0

2021 ◽  
pp. 107511
Author(s):  
Sven Winkelhaus ◽  
Eric H. Grosse ◽  
Stefan Morana
Keyword(s):  
Order Picking

See the light: Optimization of put‐to‐light order picking systems

2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nils Boysen ◽  
David Füßler ◽  
Konrad Stephan
Keyword(s):  
Order Picking ◽  
Picking Systems

Pick-by-vision: augmented reality supported order picking

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (5-7) ◽  
pp. 461-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rupert Reif ◽  
Willibald A. Günthner
Keyword(s):  
Augmented Reality ◽  
Order Picking

Towards Finding the Optimum Position in the Visual Field for a Head Worn Display Used for Task Guidance with Non-registered Graphics

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
Georgianna Lin ◽  
Malcolm Haynes ◽  
Sarthak Srinivas ◽  
Pramod Kotipalli ◽  
Thad Starner
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Order Picking ◽  
Field Of View ◽  
Line Of Sight ◽  
Single Task ◽  
Horizontal Field ◽  
Optimum Position ◽  
Preference Task ◽  
Task Efficiency ◽  
Task Guidance

Where should a HWD be placed in a user's visual field? We present two studies that compare comfort, preference, task efficiency and accuracy for various HWD positions. The first study offsets a 9.2° horizontal field-of-view (FOV) display temporally (toward the ear) from 0° to 30° in 10° steps. 30° proves too uncomfortable while 10° is the most preferred position for a simple button-pushing game, corroborating results from previous single-task reading experiments. The second experiment uses a Magic Leap One to compare 10° x 10° FOV interfaces centered at line-of-sight, temporally offset 15° (center-right), inferiorly offset 15° (bottom-center), and offset in both directions (bottom-right) for an order picking task. The bottom-right position proved worst in terms of accuracy and several subjective metrics when compared to the line-of-sight position.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document