scholarly journals The Agricultural Productivity Gap: A New Look at the Measurement Problem

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong-il You
2013 ◽  
Vol 129 (2) ◽  
pp. 939-993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas Gollin ◽  
David Lagakos ◽  
Michael E. Waugh

Abstract According to national accounts data, value added per worker is much higher in the nonagricultural sector than in agriculture in the typical country, particularly in developing countries. Taken at face value, this “agricultural productivity gap” suggests that labor is greatly misallocated across sectors. In this article, we draw on new micro evidence to ask to what extent the gap is still present when better measures of sector labor inputs and value added are taken into consideration. We find that even after considering sector differences in hours worked and human capital per worker, as well as alternative measures of sector output constructed from household survey data, a puzzlingly large gap remains.


1996 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 679-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Geib-Gundersen ◽  
Elizabeth Zahrt

A debate has recently been re-ignited over the pace of long-run productivity growth in nineteenth-century agriculture. Before 1966 the view was one of accelerated productivity over the course of the century, and this view was confirmed by the statistics on farm gross product published in 1960 by Marvin Towne and Wayne Rasmussen. The appearance in 1966 of Stanley Lebergott's labor force series changed this traditional perspective. When combined with Towne and Rasmussen's output figures, Lebergott's figures suggested that productivity growth was slower after the Civil War than before, calling into question the more plausible pattern of postbellum increases. A few historians were skeptical of these new findings, but were unable to dispute the seemingly solid foundation upon which they were built. Finally in 1993, Thomas Weiss argued that the skeptics were in fact correct to be wary of Lebergott's revisions.


2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 1807-1817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenbiao Cai ◽  
Manish Pandey

Author(s):  
A Singbo ◽  
E Njuguna-Mungai ◽  
J O Yila ◽  
K Sissoko ◽  
R Tabo

Abstract This paper decomposes the gender agricultural productivity gap and measures the factors that influence the gap between male and female agricultural plot managers in Mali. The Oaxaca–Blinder approach and the recentred influence function (RIF) decomposition methodology are applied to a nationally representative survey of Mali. The results show that the agricultural productivity of female plot managers is 20.18% lower than that of male plot managers. Additionally, while more than half (56%) of the agricultural productivity gap is influenced by female-specific structural disadvantages, 44% of the gap is due to an endowment effect. Socio-economic characteristics such as the educational level and age of the plot manager, environmental factors and agricultural production practices, i.e., the differential use of inputs (organic or inorganic fertiliser and improved seeds) and the use of hired female workers seem to affect the female-specific structural disadvantages. To reduce or close the gender productivity gap, the underlying causes of female-specific structural disadvantages must be addressed to enable female farmers to obtain the same returns as men. Traditional means of addressing the gender gap, such as providing education for women in rural areas and facilitating rural women’ access to extension services and improved seeds, can mitigate the endowment deficit. This paper highlights the need to develop a better understanding of the factors influencing the structural disadvantages faced by female farmers in Mali that could feed into the development of more effective policies to address the gender gap in agricultural productivity, improving productivity and gender equity and reducing poverty.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. e0192432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Njuki ◽  
Boris E. Bravo-Ureta ◽  
Christopher J. O’Donnell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document