scholarly journals Decision-Making, Financial Risk Aversion and Behavioral Biases: The Role of Testosterone and Stress

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Nofsinger ◽  
Fernando Patterson ◽  
Corey A. Shank ◽  
Robert T. Daigler
2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Nofsinger ◽  
Fernando M. Patterson ◽  
Corey A. Shank

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadia Jabeen ◽  
Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah ◽  
Naheed Sultana ◽  
Altamash Khan

Unlike previous studies that examine the effect of behavioral biases on investor decision-making, this study explores the root causes of behavioral biases and examines the mediating role of behavioral biases in the relationship between different types of emotions and investment decision-making. The cognitive theory of depression, attentional control theory, and prospect theory together provide the foundation and anticipate that stress, depression, anxiety, and social interaction are the major sources of cognitive mistakes that,in turn, affect investment decision-making. Model testing relies upon the data collected from 252stock investors trading in different stock exchanges of Pakistan; in order to test the hypothesized relationship, structural equation modeling has been used. Depression is a major source of loss aversion bias. Anxiety is a strong source of herding. Stress is a major source of representative bias.Social interaction is a root cause of overconfidence. Loss aversion bias, herding, and overconfidence fully mediate the relationship between depression, anxiety, social interaction, and investor decision; however, anxiety has the strongest impact on investor decision via herding bias, while stress has both insignificant direct and indirect effect on investment decision-making. Keywords: Sources of biases, self-efficacy, behavioral pattern, investment decision.


Author(s):  
James C. Engle Warnick ◽  
Javier Escobal ◽  
Sonia C. Laszlo

Abstract While the effect of risk aversion on farmers' decision-making has long been documented, far less is known about the effect of ambiguity aversion. We argue that ambiguity aversion is just as relevant to their decision-making process because they are uncertain about the yield distributions generated by new technologies. By experimentally measuring risk and ambiguity aversion in rural Peru, we provide new evidence on the role of ambiguity aversion on farm decisions in developing countries: ambiguity aversion, not risk aversion, reduces the likelihood that farmers plant more than one variety of their main crop.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Fan Liu

Risk and time preferences influence the insurance purchase decisions under uncertainty. Accident forgiveness, often considered as “premium insurance,” protects policyholders against a premium increase in the next period if an at-fault accident occurs. In this paper, by conducting a unique experiment in the controlled laboratory conditions, we examine the role of risk and time preferences in accident forgiveness purchase decisions. We find that individual discount rates and product price significantly affect premium insurance purchase decision. Interestingly, we also find evidence that less risk averse policyholders in general behave more like risk neutral when making insurance decision. Risk attitudes affect insurance decision-making only among those who have relatively high degree of risk aversion.


2012 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuo Wang ◽  
Ian Krajbich ◽  
Ralph Adolphs ◽  
Naotsugu Tsuchiya

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document