Civil Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights: Public Consultation on the Efficiency of Proceedings and Accessibility of Measures. CEIPI's Comments on the Public Consultation, with a Focus on Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Geiger ◽  
Xavier Seuba ◽  
Asako Hatanaka
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Public Consultation ◽  
The Public

International Protection of Intellectual Property Rights: Special Refrence with Intangible Properties and Copyright Laws.

LAW REVIEW ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohit P Singh ◽  
Shiv Kumar Tripathi
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
International Protection ◽  
The Public ◽  
Copyright Laws ◽  
Rapid Pace

In view of the rapid pace of technological, scientific and medical innovations in India and abroad, the intellectual property rights i.e., copyright, patent and other neighboring rights, have been recognized in Indian and foreign jurisdiction. Moreover, its scope and content have expanded pursuant to statutory amendments over the years. Growing recognisiont, expansion and protection of IPRs needs to harmonised with the public interest. Within this backdrop, copyright law, patent law etc. have made elaborate provisions and endeavours have also been made at international level to strike a balance between protection of individual’s IPRS and social interest. The present article tries to examine the contours of protection of IPRS at national and international levels with special reference to copyright law.

The Law and Economics Analysis of Intellectual Property: Paradigmatic Shift From Incentives to Traditional Property

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eli M. Salzberger
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Law And Economics ◽  
Physical Property ◽  
Microeconomic Theory ◽  
General Notion ◽  
Technological Revolution ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Commons

This paper focuses on the normative analysis of intellectual property rights, in light of the technological revolution of the Internet and accompanying technologies. After a brief overview of the various philosophical justifications for awarding intellectual property rights, it identifies two major Law and Economics paradigms for the analysis of intellectual property: the incentives paradigm, which is founded upon the public goods analysis of neo-classical microeconomic theory, and the tragedy of the commons literature, which is based on the economic analysis of externalities. The paper raises several points of critique towards both frameworks of analysis and especially towards their inability to point to the desirable extent of intellectual property rights (IPR) and the direction of their reform required as the result of the recent technological revolution. It further criticizes the dominant contemporary Law and Economics writings in this field as shifting to a new proprietary paradigm that pre-assumes information to be an object of property, overlooking its fundamental differences from physical property and focusing on its management rather than on its initial justifications. The paper is concluded with some tentative thoughts on the general notion of “Property Rights” in light of the contemporary approach concerning intellectual property.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PENCATATAN LOGO SEBAGAI CIPTAAN SETELAH BERLAKUNYA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA

NOTARIUS ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 118
Author(s):  
Widowati Maria Teresa ◽  
Budi Santoso
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Creation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Legal Entities

With the enactment of Law Number 28, 2014 About Copyright the creation of art in the form of a logo or distinctive sign is used as a brand in the trade of goods/services or used as a symbol of the organization, entity, or legal entities can not be recorded. Logo that cannot be registered as creation may be registered as trademarks and obtain trademarks protection. Associated with the unregistered logo in the List of Works does not reduce the copyrights protection of the logo, because the protection of the logo as Creation appears declaratively. Consequences of the unlisted logo in the List of Works are logo will not get an official passage on Creation. The government needs to tighten substantive and material checks on all works listed in the field of Intellectual Property Rights and the government may take the initiative to carry out dissemination and counselling accessible to the public especially for business practitioner. Keywords : Logo, Legal Protection, Copyrights AbstrakDengan diberlakukannya Undang-undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta, seni lukis yang berupa logo atau tanda pembeda yang digunakan sebagai merek dalam perdagangan barang/jasa atau digunakan sebagai lambang organisasi, badan usaha, atau badan hukum tidak dapat dicatatkan. Logo yang tidak dapat dicatatkan sebagai Ciptaan dapat didaftarkan sebagai Merek dan mendapatkan perlindungan Merek. Terkait dengan tidak dicatatkannya logo dalam Daftar Ciptaan tidak mengurangi perlindungan Hak Cipta atas logo, karena perlindungan logo sebagai Ciptaan muncul secara deklaratif. Konsekuensi dari tidak dapat dicatatkannya logo dalam Daftar Ciptaan adalah Ciptaan logo tidak akan mendapatkan petikan resmi atas Ciptaan. Pemerintah perlu untuk memperketat pemeriksaan substantif maupun materiil terhadap seluruh karya yang didaftarkan di seluruh bidang Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan dapat mengambil inisiatif untuk melakukan diseminasi dan penyuluhan yang dapat diakses secara mudah bagi masyarakat pada umumnya dan pelaku bisnis pada khususnya. Kata kunci : Logo, Perlindungan Hukum, Hak Cipta 

scholarly journals Penerapan Pasal 68 Ayat 1 Jo Pasal 4 Dan 6 Undang-Undang No.15 Tahun 2001 Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Kok Tong Kopitiam pada Putusan No. 05/Merek/2010/PN.Niaga Medan

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Desriyana Desriyana ◽  
H.A. Lawali Hasibuan
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Free Trade ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Human Thought ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Intellectual Abilities ◽  
Article 5 ◽  
The Relationship

<p class="JudulAbstrakInggris"><em>Application of Article 68 Paragraph 1 Jo Article 4 and 6 of Law No. 15 of 2001 in Brand Dispute Resolution Kok Tong Kopitiam of Decision No. 05 / Merek / 2010 / PN.Niaga Medan</em></p><p class="JudulAbstrakInggris">Abstract</p><h1>Brands are the result of human thought and intelligence which can take the form of discovery. Brands are used as a differentiator between products produced by a person or legal entity with products produced by other parties. The current journey to free trade, aspects of intellectual property rights, will play a very important role in national and international trade. Intellectual property rights are rights that arise or are born due to human intellectual abilities in the form of findings, works, creations or creations in the field of technology, science, art and literature. Based on Article 68 paragraph (1) of Law Number 15 of 2001 which states that "Brand cancellation claims can be filed by interested parties based on the reasons referred to in Article 4, Article 5, and Article 6. This type of research is normative juridical namely research which is focused on reviewing the application or rules or norms in positive law. The nature of this research is analytical descriptive, which carefully describes the characteristics of the facts to determine the frequency of something that happens. The purpose of this study was to find out the judge's consideration in resolving the dispute over the Kong Tong Kopi Tiam brand and to find out the relationship between Article 68 paragraph (1) Jo. Articles 4 and 6 of Law Number 15 of 2001 in the resolution of the Kok Tong Kopi Tiam brand dispute.</h1>

scholarly journals Perlindungan Pemilik Rahasia Dagang Dalam Perjanjian Waralaba

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anik Tri Haryani
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Trade Secret ◽  
Trade Secrets ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Research Show

Tight business competition requires creativity for entrepreneurs to stay competitive by seeking new breakthroughs in developing their businesses. Many franchise models are chosen to develop businesses. One of the criteria for franchising is the Intellectual Property Rights that have been registered including trade secrets. The purpose of this study is to examine the legal protection of trade secret owners in a franchise agreement, and legal consequences if there is a violation of trade secrets in the franchise agreement. The method used in this study is juridical normative with a law approach and conceptual approach. The results of the research show that the protection of trade secrets in the franchise agreement can be done by making an agreement which contains a confidential information, non disclosure agreement clause, a non compete agreement as well as a non solicitation agreement clause. Legal consequences in the event of a violation of trade secrets in the franchise agreement can be prosecuted civilly by paying compensation through a lawsuit to court or can be resolved through arbitration or alternative dispute resolution. In addition, it can also be prosecuted according to Article 17 paragraph (1) of Law Number 30 of 2000 concerning Trade Secrets with the penalty of imprisonment of a maximum of two years and a maximum fine of three hundred million rupiah.

An Overview of Intellectual Property Rights and Systems

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justine Pila
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Social Values ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Member States ◽  
The Public ◽  
15Th Century ◽  
International Commitments ◽  
The Eu

This chapter considers the nature, aims, and values of intellectual property (IP) rights and systems. It traces the emergence of statutory IP laws in Europe from the 15th century as means of facilitating and rewarding the introduction to the public of certain intangible expressive and informational objects of social value, and the different IP philosophies that they reflect. It then considers the IP rights and systems of European and UK law today, and their vesting of temporary exclusive rights in respect of different categories of ‘intellectual creation’, broadly conceived. The EU is presented as seeking, through its recognition and protection of IP rights, to build on the traditions of its Member States in a manner that is consistent with both its international commitments and its particular economic and social values and aims. The result of this objective is considered, along with certain distinctions of importance to IP rights and systems.

scholarly journals Impact of Intellectual Property Rights on the National Science System

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Straus
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Science System ◽  
The Public ◽  
American Science ◽  
Research Sector ◽  
The Us ◽  
National Science

After using the 2020 developments of the COVID-19 vaccines as an example of successful cooperation between academia, industry and government for supporting research and translating its results into innovations assisted by patents, the article turns to the national science systems. First, it addresses the pioneering role of the 1945 “Science the Endless Frontier”, the Magna Carta of American Science and its patent policy. Retraced are the subsequent US developments revealing a gradual turn from incentivizing knowledge and technology transfer from government funded institutions to industry by allowing it only in the form of non-exclusive licenses, to imposing the public research sector an obligation to commercialize its research results by allowing exclusive licenses and assignments of intellectual property rights to private business. This all by recognizing and preserving academic freedom and inquiry. Next, it pays attention to developments in countries where legislators followed overall the US model. Finally, the contribution discusses the intellectual property rights system in the light of the specific needs of academic researchers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document