Defined Benefit Plans vs. Defined Contribution Plans: An Evaluation Framework Using Random Returns

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Sivarama Krishnan ◽  
Julie Cumbie
Keyword(s):  
Evaluation Framework ◽  
Defined Benefit ◽  
Defined Contribution ◽  
Defined Contribution Plans ◽  
Defined Benefit Plans

scholarly journals Portability Rewards And Avoidance Of Longevity Risk: Factors In The Growth Of Defined Contribution Plans

2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Beverley Hollingsworth ◽  
Wei Wang
Keyword(s):  
Investment Strategy ◽  
Longevity Risk ◽  
Defined Benefit ◽  
Defined Contribution ◽  
Insufficient Evidence ◽  
Font Size ◽  
Defined Contribution Plans ◽  
Investment Returns ◽  
Defined Benefit Plans ◽  
The Relationship

<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt; mso-pagination: none;"><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt; mso-themecolor: text1;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">The decline in defined benefit plans has been offset by a significant growth in defined contribution plans. An important consideration in this phenomenon lies in the fact that employees view this shift as a tradeoff between longevity risk and portability rewards. Companies are shifting from defined benefit plans to avoid the longevity risks associated with such plans. On the other hand, in some instances when given the option, employees chose defined contribution plans, due to the associated portability rewards where participants have a choice of rolling over, or transferring plans from former employers.. This paper examined research relevant in assessing factors contributing to growth in defined contribution with particular interest in 401(k)s and the relationship between investment returns, the availability of loans, and investment strategy that may affect plan growth. It is concluded that there is insufficient evidence for assuming a relationship between investment returns, loan availability and investment strategy and the growth of defined contribution plans. </span></span></p>

Scrambling the Nest Egg: How Well Do Teachers Understand Their Pensions, and What Do They Think about Alternative Pension Structures?

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 558-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael DeArmond ◽  
Dan Goldhaber
Keyword(s):  
Pension Plans ◽  
Washington State ◽  
Retirement Savings ◽  
Defined Benefit ◽  
Defined Contribution ◽  
Administrative Records ◽  
Defined Contribution Plans ◽  
Alternative Plan ◽  
Defined Benefit Plans ◽  
Career Teachers

In this article we focus on two questions: How well do teachers understand their current pension plans, and what do they think about alternative plan structures? The data come from administrative records and a 2006 survey of teachers in Washington State. The results suggest that Washington's teachers are fairly knowledgeable about their pensions, although new entrants and mid-career teachers appear to be less knowledgeable than veterans. As for teachers' preferences for plan structure, the survey suggests that when it comes to investing additional retirement savings, a plurality of teachers favor defined contribution plans that offer more portability and choice but also more risk than traditional defined benefit plans. Again, perhaps unsurprisingly, the findings suggest that, all else equal, teachers newer to the profession are more likely than veterans to favor a defined contribution structure.

scholarly journals The Distribution of Investment Risk in Defined Benefit Pension Plans: A Reconsideration

2005 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 136-157
Author(s):  
Douglas E. Hyatt ◽  
James E. Pesando
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Pension Fund ◽  
Fund Performance ◽  
Pension Plans ◽  
Investment Risk ◽  
Defined Benefit ◽  
Defined Contribution ◽  
Defined Contribution Plans ◽  
Defined Benefit Plans ◽  
Defined Benefit Pension Plans

The "textbook " description is that members of defined benefit pension plans bear no investment risk, in sharp contrast to members of defined contribution plans. Yet formal or informal bargaining may focus on the size of required employer contributions to a defined benefit plan. If at least some of the costs of such employer contributions are shifted back to workers, then members of defined benefit plans do bear investment risk. We utilize three sources of empirical evidence (a survey of pension specialists, econometric analysis, and case studies) to support the proposition that employees do bear at least some of the investment risk associated with pension fund performance. Poor fund performance leads to larger employer contributions to maintain the defined benefit obligation and this in turn leads to lower levels of other forms of compensation. We conclude that riskshifting does occur, in at least some plans, and that the textbook distinction is overstated.

scholarly journals Life After Defined Benefit Plans

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin A. Goldberg ◽  
Robert E. Wnek ◽  
Michael J. Rolleri
Keyword(s):  
Pension Plan ◽  
Profit Sharing ◽  
Pension Plans ◽  
Defined Benefit ◽  
Defined Contribution ◽  
Cash Balance ◽  
Benefit Plan ◽  
Defined Contribution Plans ◽  
Defined Benefit Plans ◽  
Recent Developments

Employers have moved from traditional pension plans to cash balance and other alternative defined benefit plans. However, it may be that the best approach lies beyond defined benefit plans completely. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) was enacted to protect workers. Its focus was on the defined benefit plan, which at that time meant a traditional pension plan that provided lifetime income to retired workers. Over the years traditional pension plans have declined in number, often due to their increasing costs. Many of these plans have been replaced by the 401(k) plan, a profit-sharing plan partly or wholly funded by employee contributions. There has also been a rise in hybrid plans, plans that have features of both defined benefit and defined contribution plans. Recent developments highlight the weaknesses in traditional pension plans. Replacing a traditional pension plan with a cash balance plan, a hybrid plan that qualifies as a defined benefit plan, does not fully address all the problems. It may be that there is limited advantage to the continued emphasis on defined benefit plans. Instead, defined contribution plans that contain some features of defined benefit plans may better address the current retirement-plan issues.

scholarly journals The use of stock options and retirement plans to retain non-executive employees

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 57-72
Author(s):  
Kathleen Weiden ◽  
Jane Mooney
Keyword(s):  
Stock Options ◽  
Stock Option ◽  
Defined Benefit ◽  
Defined Contribution ◽  
Retirement Plans ◽  
Compensation Contracts ◽  
Large Sample ◽  
Retirement Plan ◽  
Defined Contribution Plans ◽  
Defined Benefit Plans

Firms expend significant resources to retain employees. In this paper, we examine how firms that use stock options grant them differently when they also utilize retirement plans in non-executive employee compensation contracts. Using a large sample of US firms, we examine the relation between the stock option proportion of pay of non-executive employees and firms’ use of a retirement plan of any type. We then examine how firms’ use of stock options is affected by the type of plan (defined benefit or defined contribution) used by the firm. We find that firms reduce their use of stock options when there are other deferred pay mechanisms in place, suggesting they act as substitutes. We also find that firms with defined benefit retirement plans reduce their use of stock options for non-executives to a greater extent than firms with defined contribution plans, suggesting a greater degree of substitutability between defined benefit plans and stock options than between defined contribution plans and stock options.

Toward the 401(K) Ownership Society

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. McCarthy
Keyword(s):  
The Other ◽  
Postwar Period ◽  
Defined Benefit ◽  
Defined Contribution ◽  
Labor Management ◽  
Defined Contribution Plans ◽  
Defined Benefit Plans ◽  
Management Conflicts ◽  
The One

This chapter explains the rise of defined-contribution plans, such as 401(k)s, after the late 1970s. In the postwar period, policymakers were determined to quiet labor-management conflicts and establish a regularized labor peace that could take advantage of opportunities in war torn markets. As the capitalist context changed, so did this orientation. By the late 1970s policymakers moved to restrain and depress wages to counter a growing inflation crisis. The chapter shows that the rise of 401(k)s, on the one hand, and the decline of defined-benefit plans, on the other, was the inadvertent result of policymakers attempting to revive America's stagnating and inflationary economy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document