Autonomy, Peace, and 'Put' Options in the Mass Tort Class Action

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Nagareda
Keyword(s):  
Class Action ◽  
Put Options ◽  
Mass Tort

Autonomy, Peace, and Put Options in the Mass Tort Class Action

2002 ◽  
Vol 115 (3) ◽  
pp. 747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Nagareda
Keyword(s):  
Class Action ◽  
Put Options ◽  
Mass Tort

Mandatory-Litigation Class Action: The Only Option for Mass Tort Cases

2002 ◽  
Vol 115 (3) ◽  
pp. 831 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Rosenberg
Keyword(s):  
Class Action ◽  
Mass Tort

CANADIAN REFLECTIONS ON THE TOBACCO WARS: SOME UNINTENDED CONSEQUE5NCES OF MASS TORT LITIGATION

2004 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 579-604
Author(s):  
Jeff Berryman
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Class Action ◽  
Large Impact ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Mass Tort ◽  
Class Actions ◽  
Tort Litigation ◽  
Mass Torts

During the 1990s many Commonwealth legislatures enacted ‘class action’ or ‘representative proceedings’ legislation.1The main justification for these initiatives was to increase access to justice for claimants particularly where the injury was widespread but the harm suffered by any particular individual was small. Much of this legislation built on developments in the United States, which had developed a sizable jurisprudence in the area. ‘Mass torts’, those defined as having a large impact engaging multiple claimants, have often formed the cause of action in US class actions. A review of the website ‘Big Class Actions‘,2which lists over one hundred current suits in the United States, is instructive on how the class action industry has grown in that country.

scholarly journals Class Wars: The Dilemma of the Mass Tort Class Action

1995 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
pp. 1343 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Coffee
Keyword(s):  
Class Action ◽  
Mass Tort

Deinstitutionalization: A class action suit

1983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason R. Dura ◽  
Russ Rosenberg
Keyword(s):  
Class Action
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document