A Chestertonian Critique of Contemporary Liberalism and Its Aspirations to Cosmopolitan Reach

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Betti
GEOgraphia ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (15) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hector Díaz-Polanco

A demanda por autonomia e reconhecimento da diversidade ligada aos diferentes grupos étnico-culturais latino-americanos enfrenta grandes obstáculos, não só o liberalismo não pluralista, mas tarnbtm o relativismo absoluto que age, muitas vezes, em nome da própria autonomia. O texto prioriza a crítica ao liberalismo contemporâneo na releitura de Kant feita por John Rawls.Abstract Search for autonomy and diversity recognition regarding different ethniccultural groups in Latin America faces great obstacles, not only through non-pluralistic liberalism but also through absolute relativism, which often acts in name of very autonomy. This work stresses the critics to contemporary liberalism under John Rawls re-reading of Kant.


2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Guala

The title of this book is rather misleading. “Birth of neoliberal governmentality,” or something like that, would have been more faithful to its contents. In Foucault's vocabulary, “biopolitics” is the “rationalisation” of “governmentality” (p. 261): it's the theory, in other words, as opposed to the art (governmentality) of managing people. The mismatch between title and content is easily explained: the general theme of the courses at the Collège de France had to be announced at the beginning of each academic year. It is part of the mandate of every professor at the Collège, however, that his lectures should follow closely his current research. As a consequence it wasn't unusual for Foucault to take new directions while he was lecturing. In 1979, for the first and only time in his career, he took a diversion into contemporary political philosophy. His principal object of investigation became “neoliberal” political economy. More precisely, he got increasingly interested in those strands of contemporary liberalism that use economic science both as a principle of limitation and of inspiration for the management of people.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 307-321
Author(s):  
Luke O’Sullivan ◽  

The concept of civilisation is a controversial one because it is unavoidably normative in its implications. Its historical associations with the effort of Western imperialism to impose substantive conditions of life have made it difficult for contemporary liberalism to find a definition of “civilization” that can be reconciled with progressive discourse that seeks to avoid exclusions of various kinds. But because we lack a way of identifying what is peculiar to the relationship of civilisation that avoids the problem of domination, it has tended to be conflated with other ideas. Taking Samuel Huntington's idea of a “Clash of Civilisations” as a starting point, this article argues that we suffer from a widespread confusion of civilisation with “culture,” and that we also confuse it with other ideas including modernity and technological development. Drawing on Thomas Hobbes, the essay proposes an alternative definition of civilisation as the existence of limits on how we may treat others.


1979 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 543-554
Author(s):  
George Feaver

There is something intrepidly parochial in Patricia Hughes's account of Mill's views. Her very opening statement, with its new vision of society, its “emerging social forces,” its principals “trapped by traditional influences,” sets the tone for the enterprise which follows—an historical melodrama with J. S. Mill, the patron saint of contemporary liberalism, reborn in Canada without his aspergillum, an affable enough character, a sort of Bruno Gerussi of the political thought set, his do-gooder's heart generally in the right place but his head usually muddled: an admirably earnest figure, even, who some how always misses the point but, up to now, has gotten away with it. Our aspiring script-writer intends to set things right, to show how we can redo the storyline (which may require substituting another nineteenth century great in the leading role), so as to combine passion and theory in a really radical vision of a fully liberated society.


1999 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-269
Author(s):  
Peter L.P. Simpson ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document