scholarly journals VAR Meets DSGE: Uncovering the Monetary Transmission Mechanism in Low-Income Countries

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin (Grace) Li ◽  
Stephen A. O'Connell ◽  
Christopher Scott Adam ◽  
Andrew Berg ◽  
Peter J. Montiel
2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 455-478
Author(s):  
Bin Grace Li ◽  
Christopher Adam ◽  
Andrew Berg ◽  
Peter Montiel ◽  
Stephen O’Connell

AbstractStructural Vector Autoregression (SVAR) methods suggest the monetary transmission mechanism may be weak and unreliable in many low-income African countries. But are structural VARs identified via short-run restrictions capable of detecting a transmission mechanism when one exists, under research conditions typical of low-income countries (LICs)? Using a small DSGE as our data-generating process, we assess the impact on VAR-based inference of short data samples, measurement error, high-frequency supply shocks, and other features of the LIC environment. The impact of these features on finite-sample bias appears to be relatively modest when identification is valid—a strong caveat, especially in LICs. Nonetheless many of these features undermine the precision of estimated impulse responses to monetary policy shocks, and cumulatively they suggest that statistically and economically insignificant results can be expected even when the underlying transmission mechanism is strong. These data features not only undermine the efficacy of the SVAR methodology for research and policy-making, but are also severe enough to motivate a continued search for monetary policy rules that are robust to these limitations.


Author(s):  
Bin Grace Li ◽  
Christopher Adam ◽  
Andrew Berg ◽  
Peter Montiel ◽  
Stephen O’Connell

VAR methods suggest that the monetary transmission mechanism may be weak and unreliable in low-income countries. But are structural VARs identified via short-run restrictions capable of detecting a transmission mechanism where one exists, under research conditions typical of these countries? Using small DSGEs as data-generating processes, the chapter assesses the impact on VAR-based inference of short data samples, measurement error, high-frequency supply shocks, and other features of the LIC environment. The impact of these features on finite-sample bias appears to be relatively modest when identification is valid—a strong caveat, especially in low-income countries. However, many of these features undermine the precision of estimated impulse responses to monetary policy shocks, and cumulatively they suggest that ‘insignificant’ results can be expected even when the underlying transmission mechanism is strong.


2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (90) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Grace Li ◽  
Stephen O'Connell ◽  
Christopher Adam ◽  
Andrew Berg ◽  
Peter Montiel ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 375-382
Author(s):  
Ufuk Can ◽  
Mehmet Emin Bocuoglu ◽  
Zeynep Gizem Can

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 42
Author(s):  
Dina Cakmur Yildirtan ◽  
Selin Sarili

Monetary transmission mechanism is the mechanism which shows  in what ways and what extent interaction between the real economy-monetary policy, impacts aggregate demand and production. While transmission channels or mechanisms traditionally classified they divided into three categories; interest rates, Exchange rates and other asset prices.In this study to test the existence of the European debt crisis by the monetary transmission mechanism, 15 members of European Union country by using annual (2002-2014) data set were included into study. We use panel unit root tests to analyze whether the variables in the model are stationary or not. For the countries included in the study, panel causality tests developed by Granger is applied. Panel Vector Autoregressive Model has been estimated and results of Impulse-Response Analysis and Variance Decomposition have been interpreted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document