Electoral Consequences of Welfare State Expansion: The Case of the Food Stamp Program

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Kogan
Keyword(s):  
Welfare State ◽  
Food Stamp ◽  
Food Stamp Program ◽  
State Expansion

scholarly journals Economic Globalization and the Welfare State in Affluent Democracies, 1975–2001

2005 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 921-948 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Brady ◽  
Jason Beckfield ◽  
Martin Seeleib-Kaiser
Keyword(s):  
Welfare State ◽  
Economic Globalization ◽  
Welfare States ◽  
Welfare Regimes ◽  
State Expansion ◽  
State Variation ◽  
State Models ◽  
New Evidence ◽  
Previous Scholarship ◽  
The Welfare State

Previous scholarship is sharply divided over how or if globalization influences welfare states. The effects of globalization may be positive causing expansion, negative triggering crisis and reduction, curvilinear contributing to convergence, or insignificant. We bring new evidence to bear on this debate with an analysis of three welfare state measures and a comprehensive array of economic globalization indicators for 17 affluent democracies from 1975 to 2001. The analysis suggests several conclusions. First, state-of-the-art welfare state models warrant revision in the globalization era. Second, most indicators of economic globalization do not have significant effects, but a few affect the welfare state and improve models of welfare state variation. Third, the few significant globalization effects are in differing directions and often inconsistent with extant theories. Fourth, the globalization effects are far smaller than the effects of domestic political and economic factors. Fifth, the effects of globalization are not systematically different between European and non-European countries, or liberal and non-liberal welfare regimes. Increased globalization and a modest convergence of the welfare state have occurred, but globalization does not clearly cause welfare state expansion, crisis, and reduction or convergence. Ultimately, this study suggests skepticism toward bold claims about globalization's effect on the welfare state.

Regional Variation in the Determinants of Food Stamp Program Participation

1984 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
J E Kodras
Keyword(s):  
Federal Government ◽  
United States Of America ◽  
Regional Variation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Food Stamp ◽  
Food Stamp Program ◽  
Program Participation ◽  
The Us ◽  
Economic Need ◽  
Welfare Agencies

In this paper I investigate the degree to which determinants of participation in an American welfare program operate differentially throughout the country to create disparities in program use. A spatially expanded model is specified to examine areal variations in the use of the US Food Stamp Program. The regionally varying response of Program participation to conditions of economic need and the presence of minorities appears to reflect different degrees of urbanism among sections of the country. Regional variations in the response of Program participation to benefit levels appear to be a result of different intergovernmental arrangements between the federal government and state welfare agencies. The often-made assumption of spatial stability in the influence of welfare determinants is not justified, given the regional complexities within which the welfare system operates in the United States of America.

scholarly journals Herbal education is reasonable and necessary for Food Stamp program participants

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Ann Lohse ◽  
Robin Rifkin ◽  
Jodi L Stotts ◽  
Rayna G Cooper
Keyword(s):  
Food Stamp ◽  
Food Stamp Program

Climate change and the welfare state? Exploring Australian attitudes to climate and social policy

2016 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 741-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Spies-Butcher ◽  
Adam Stebbing
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Welfare State ◽  
Social Protection ◽  
Climate Change Policy ◽  
Clean Energy ◽  
State Expansion ◽  
Change Policy ◽  
Climate Action ◽  
Environmental Causes ◽  
The Relationship

Despite growing evidence of significant impacts from human-induced climate change, policy responses have been slow. Understanding this policy inertia has led to competing explanations, which either point to the need to build a consensual politics separated from economic partisanship, or which encourage solidarities between environmental and social movements and issues. This article analyses a recent successful mobilisation, leading to the passage of the Clean Energy Act in Australia, to explore the relationship between attitudes to environmental and social protection, particularly among the core constituency in favour of stronger climate action. Using social survey data from the Australian Election Study, the article finds evidence of independent associations between prioritising environmental concerns and support for welfare state expansion, and a realignment of materialist and post-materialist values. This we argue is consistent with Polanyian analysis that posits a link between social and environmental causes based on resistance to commodification.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document