Do Background Checks on Private Gun Transfers Help Stop Mass Public Shootings?

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Lott
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chelsea A. Binns ◽  
Robin J. Kempf
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Piero Ignazi

The book integrates philosophical, historical, and empirical analyses in order to highlight the profound roots of the limited legitimation of parties in contemporary society. Political parties’ long attempts to gain legitimacy are analysed from a philosophical–historical perspective pinpointing crucial passages in their theoretical and empirical acceptance. The book illustrates the process through which parties first emerged and then achieved full legitimacy in the early twentieth century. It shows how, paradoxically, their role became absolute in the totalitarian regimes of the interwar period when the party became hyper-powerful. In the post-war period, parties shifted from a golden age of positive reception and organizational development towards a more difficult relationship with society as it moved into post-industrialism. Parties were unable to master societal change and favoured the state to recover resources they were no longer able to extract from their constituencies. Parties have become richer and more powerful, but they have ‘paid’ for their pervasive presence in society and the state with a declining legitimacy. The party today is caught in a dramatic contradiction. It has become a sort of Leviathan with clay feet: very powerful thanks to the resources it gets from the state and to its control of societal and state spheres due to an extension of clientelistic and patronage practices; but very weak in terms of legitimacy and confidence in the eyes of the mass public. However, it is argued that there is still no alternative to the party, and some hypotheses to enhance party democracy are advanced.


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Thomas Schroeder
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-179
Author(s):  
Tobias Heinrich ◽  
Christopher Witko

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 1031-1047
Author(s):  
Neil A. O’Brian

What explains the alignment of antiabortion positions within the Republican party? I explore this development among voters, activists, and elites before 1980. By 1970, antiabortion attitudes among ordinary voters correlated with conservative views on a range of noneconomic issues including civil rights, Vietnam, feminism and, by 1972, with Republican presidential vote choice. These attitudes predated the parties taking divergent abortion positions. I argue that because racial conservatives and military hawks entered the Republican coalition before abortion became politically activated, issue overlap among ordinary voters incentivized Republicans to oppose abortion rights once the issue gained salience. Likewise, because proabortion voters generally supported civil rights, once the GOP adopted a Southern strategy, this predisposed pro-choice groups to align with the Democratic party. A core argument is that preexisting public opinion enabled activist leaders to embed the anti (pro) abortion movement in a web of conservative (liberal) causes. A key finding is that the white evangelical laity’s support for conservative abortion policies preceded the political mobilization of evangelical leaders into the pro-life movement. I contend the pro-life movement’s alignment with conservatism and the Republican party was less contingent on elite bargaining, and more rooted in the mass public, than existing scholarship suggests.


1976 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-3

The balance between the advantages and disadvantages of immunisation against a disease alters as its incidence changes. Initially the fall in the incidence and complications of the disease will considerably benefit public health. When the programme of immunisation becomes successful the incidence of the disease can become so low that any serious complications of immunisation would cause more serious illness than the disease. To stop mass immunisation would increase the incidence of the disease. Has this situation been reached with pertussis? If it has, what should be done?


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document