Do Auditor-Provided Tax Services Improve Estimates of Tax Reserves in the Post-SOX and Post-FIN 48 Periods?

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristi A. Gleason ◽  
Lillian F. Mills ◽  
Michelle L. Nessa
Keyword(s):  
Fin 48 ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 217
Author(s):  
Chunlai Ye

This study investigates whether firms continue to use tax reserves to achieve financial reporting objectives in the post-FIN 48 period and the effect of auditor-provided tax services on earnings management through tax reserves. Three types of earnings management incentives are considered in this study: meeting or beating the consensus forecasts, income smoothing, and taking an “earnings bath.” The analyses yield evidence that only non-large firms manipulate tax reserves to meet/beat earnings forecast in the post-FIN 48 period; however, tax reserves are still utilized by both large and non-large firms to smooth earnings. Moreover, evidence is provided that the auditor who provides more tax services facilitates large firms’ earnings smoothing in the post-FIN 48 period, implying independence impairment. But this behavior does not exist within non-large firms, arguably because the auditor does not compromise independence for less important clients.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 1044-1074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Gupta ◽  
Rick C. Laux ◽  
Daniel P. Lynch
Keyword(s):  
Fin 48 ◽  
Use Tax ◽  

2013 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 867-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul J. Beck ◽  
Petro Lisowsky

ABSTRACT This study examines the empirical relation between voluntary participation in the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) Compliance Assurance Process (CAP) audit program, and tax uncertainty disclosed in financial statements pursuant to Financial Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48). Based on the findings of prior analytical and empirical research, we formulate and test hypotheses about the likelihood of voluntary CAP participation and the resulting effect on FIN 48 tax reserves. We find that firms with moderate-sized FIN 48 reserves are more likely to participate in CAP than firms with either small or large reserves, indicating an inverted U-shaped relation between CAP participation rates and firms' tax reserves. After controlling for non-random sample selection, we find that CAP firms significantly reduce their FIN 48 reserves by about 16.5 percent relative to non-CAP firms. However, this reduction is concentrated among firms with moderate-sized FIN 48 reserves. These cross-sectional differences are consistent with FIN 48 reserves reflecting both tax uncertainty and tax aggressiveness. JEL Classifications: M41; M42; M48; H25. Data Availability: FIN 48 data and confidential tax data on CAP participants are obtained from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Large Business & International (LB&I), Planning, Analysis, Inventory, and Research Division (PAIR). The CAP data are not publicly available; the FIN 48 data were compiled and validated by the IRS and made available to one of the authors. All other data are available from public sources identified in this treatise. Because tax data are confidential and protected by data nondisclosure agreements under the Internal Revenue Code, all statistics are presented in the aggregate; no statistics with three or fewer observations are disclosed. Any opinions are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IRS.


Author(s):  
Richard A. Cazier ◽  
Sonja O. Rego ◽  
Xiaoli (Shaolee) Tian ◽  
Ryan J. Wilson

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 1395-1429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristi A. Gleason ◽  
Lillian F. Mills ◽  
Michelle L. Nessa
Keyword(s):  
Fin 48 ◽  

Author(s):  
Amy E. Dunbar ◽  
Thomas C. Omer ◽  
Thomas D. Schultz
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document