scholarly journals On Two-Period Committee Voting: Why Straw Polls Should Have Consequences.

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Julius Frommeyer
Keyword(s):  
Committee Voting

Optimal Two Stage Committee Voting Rules

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Ayres ◽  
Colin Rowat ◽  
Nasser Zakariya
Keyword(s):  
Voting Rules ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Committee Voting

scholarly journals An analysis of admission committee voting patterns

1997 ◽  
Vol 72 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. S72-S75 ◽  
Author(s):  
C L Elam ◽  
M M Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Committee Voting

The Committee Function: An Influence Equation

1972 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 160-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas W. Casstevens
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Model ◽  
Committee Voting ◽  
The Relationship

In legislative systems a bill is commonly considered and reported by an appropriate committee before it is considered on the floor of the house. Since motions on the floor frequently relate to such bills, it is often apposite to refer to a motion's relevant committee. This article presents a mathematical model of the relationship between the relevant committee's divisions on the floor and a motion's probability of passing. Let x be the proportion of the relevant committee voting yea on the floor, z be the proportion of the relevant committee voting nay on the floor, and y be the proportion of the relevant committee neither voting yea nor voting nay on the floor, then a motion's probability of passing is (x2 + y2)/(x2 + y2 + z2). The fit between theory and observation is quite good: six hundred eleven roll calls from the 90th and 91st Congresses have been analyzed; 0.628 of the motions actually passed; and 0.613 of the motions were expected to pass.

An analysis of admission committee voting patterns

1997 ◽  
Vol 72 (10) ◽  
pp. S72???5
Author(s):  
C L Elam ◽  
M M Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Committee Voting

Contributions, Lobbying, and Committee Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives

1990 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 417-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Wright
Keyword(s):  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Mail Survey ◽  
Campaign Contributions ◽  
Controversial Issues ◽  
Policy Decisions ◽  
Voting Decisions ◽  
Committee Voting ◽  
The U.S

Lobbying efforts and campaign contributions from coalitions of groups are used to explain representatives' voting decisions within the U.S. House Ways and Means and Agriculture Committees. Information about which groups worked together on two controversial issues and which representatives they lobbied was obtained through personal interviews and a mail survey of professional lobbyists. The analysis reveals that committee-level voting, particularly in the Ways and Means Committee, is best explained by the total number of lobbying contacts representatives received from groups on each side of the issue. Campaign contributions proved somewhat useful for explaining groups' lobbying patterns; but it appears to be lobbying, not money, that shapes and reinforces representatives' policy decisions.

Investment Committee Voting and the Financing of Innovation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrey Malenko ◽  
Ramana Nanda ◽  
Matthew Rhodes-Kropf ◽  
Savitar Sundaresan
Keyword(s):  
Committee Voting
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document