The Expected Rate of Credit Losses on Banks' Loan Portfolios

Author(s):  
Trevor S. Harris ◽  
Urooj Khan ◽  
Doron Nissim
Author(s):  
Trevor S. Harris ◽  
Urooj Khan ◽  
Doron Nissim

Author(s):  
Albulena Shala ◽  
Hysen Ismajli ◽  
Rezearta Perri

This paper has been prepared to describe the regulatory measures regarding Loan classification and provisioning of South East Europe countries like Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Kosovo, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, and Slovenia. A proper loan classification and provisioning system ensures credibility of the financial system that in turn restores trust and confidence in the mind of depositors. Determining what constitutes an adequate level of provisions to absorb credit losses is often subject of debate between banks and supervisors, as changes in provisioning estimate an immediate impact in bank earnings and, eventually, regulatory capital. A comparative analysis in this study between South East Europe (SEE) countries shows that countries have the regulatory measures which correspond with international standards. However, the criteria for classifying and provisioning loan portfolios depend on the prudential policies of the central banks. In the area of NPL definition, we find that almost all of the countries in the region have some type of asset classification system in place covering all types of borrowers. Non performing exposures in the region are generally defined three criteria: 90 days past due status, borrower bankruptcy, and the significant financial difficulty of the borrower. Countries with the highest rate of non‑performing loans (2005–2015) are Serbia, Montenegro, Albania, while the countries with the highest percentage of coverage with provisions are: Kosovo, Macedonia and Serbia.


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 364-378
Author(s):  
T.B. Kuvaldina ◽  
◽  
E.V. Lobachev ◽  

2014 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett W. Cantrell ◽  
John M. McInnis ◽  
Christopher G. Yust
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 245-262
Author(s):  
Tobias Filusch ◽  
Sascha H. Mölls
Keyword(s):  

ZusammenfassungMit dem „(Lifetime) Expected Credit Loss“ hat der internationale Standardsetzer einen prospektiven Wertminderungsmaßstab für Finanzinstrumente entwickelt. Mit Blick auf die dadurch induzierte Stärkung des Gläubigerschutzes sowie eine mögliche Angleichung des deutschen HGB an die Vorgaben der IFRS sollten sich Banken und Versicherungen im genossenschaftlichen Umfeld ebenso wie Prüfungsverbände frühzeitig ein Bild von den anstehenden Änderungen machen.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1344-1361
Author(s):  
Isaiah Oino

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of transparency and disclosure on the financial performance of financial institutions. The emphasis is on assessing transparency and disclosure; auditing and compliance; risk management as indicators of corporate governance; and understanding how these parameters affect bank profitability, liquidity and the quality of loan portfolios. Design/methodology/approach A sample of 20 financial institutions was selected, with ten respondents from each, yielding a total sample size of 200. Principal component analysis (PCA), with inbuilt ability to check for composite reliability, was used to obtain composite indices for the corporate governance indicators as well as the indicators of financial performance, based on a set of questions framed for each institution. Findings The analysis demonstrates that greater disclosure and transparency, improved auditing and compliance and better risk management positively affect the financial performance of financial institutions. In terms of significance, the results show that as the level of disclosure and transparency in managerial affairs increases, the performance of financial institutions – as measured in terms of the quality of loan portfolios, liquidity and profitability – increases by 0.3046, with the effect being statistically significant at the 1 per cent level. Furthermore, as the level of auditing and the degree of compliance with banking regulations increases, the financial performance of banks improves by 0.3309. Research limitations/implications This paper did not consider time series because corporate governance does not change periodically. Practical implications This paper demonstrates the importance of disclosure and transparency in managerial affairs because the performance of financial institutions, as measured in terms of loan portfolios, liquidity and profitability, increases by 0.4 when transparency and disclosure improve, with this effect being statistically significant at the 1 per cent level. Originality/value The use of primary data in assessing the impact of corporate governance on financial performance, instead of secondary data, is the primary novelty of this study. Moreover, PCA is used to assess the weight of the various parameters.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document