Can Contracting on Career Concerns Induce CEOs to Provide Timely Disclosure of Bad News?

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen P. Baginski ◽  
John L. Campbell ◽  
Lisa A. Hinson ◽  
David S. Koo
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 94 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashiq Ali ◽  
Ningzhong Li ◽  
Weining Zhang

ABSTRACT This study examines the effect of restrictions on managers' outside employment opportunities on voluntary corporate disclosure. The recognition of the Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine (IDD) by courts in the U.S. states in which the firms are headquartered places greater restrictions on their managers from joining or forming a rival company. We find that, on average, the IDD adoption increases the asymmetric withholding of bad news. We further show that the IDD adoption increases the asymmetric withholding of bad news relative to good news for firms whose managers are mainly concerned about losing their current job. However, an opposite effect is observed for firms whose managers are mainly interested in seeking promotion elsewhere. Furthermore, these effects are less pronounced for firms subject to greater monitoring of their disclosure policy. These results suggest that managers' career concerns affect corporate disclosure policy, and the effect varies with the type of career concerns. JEL Classifications: D82; M4.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 260-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Halac ◽  
Ilan Kremer

A manager who learns privately about a project over time may want to delay quitting it if recognizing failure/lack of success hurts his reputation. In the banking industry, managers may want to roll over bad loans. How do distortions depend on expected project quality? What are the effects of releasing public information about quality? A key feature of banks is that managers learn about project quality from bad news, i.e., a default. We show that in such an environment, distortions tend to increase with expected quality and imperfect information about quality. Results differ if managers instead learn from good news. (JEL D82, D83, G21)


2017 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen P. Baginski ◽  
John L. Campbell ◽  
Lisa A. Hinson ◽  
David S. Koo

ABSTRACT Theory argues that career concerns (i.e., concerns about the impact of current performance on contemporaneous and future compensation) encourage managers to withhold bad news disclosure. However, empirical evidence regarding the extent to which a manager's career concerns are associated with a delay in bad news disclosure is limited. Across multiple proxies for career concerns, we find that the extent to which managers delay bad news is positively associated with their level of career concerns. Then, we hand-collect data on a compensation contract that firms use to reduce CEOs' career concerns (i.e., ex ante severance pay agreements). We find that if managers receive a sufficiently large payment in the event of dismissal, they no longer delay the disclosure of bad news. Overall, our findings support prior theoretical evidence that managers delay bad news disclosure due to career concerns and suggest a mechanism through which firms can mitigate the delay. JEL Classifications: M12; M41. Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text.


2001 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Dosanjh ◽  
Judy Barnes ◽  
Mohit Bhandari

1997 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 759-759
Author(s):  
Murray A. Straus
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Legg ◽  
Kate Sweeny
Keyword(s):  
Bad News ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document