scholarly journals Retirement Plans and Prospects for Retirement Income Adequacy

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack VanDerhei
Keyword(s):  
Retirement Income ◽  
Retirement Plans ◽  
Income Adequacy

scholarly journals Long-Term Sustainable Investment for Retirement

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 5000
Author(s):  
Iqbal Owadally ◽  
Jean-René Mwizere ◽  
Neema Kalidas ◽  
Kalyanie Murugesu ◽  
Muhammad Kashif
Keyword(s):  
Mutual Funds ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Retirement Income ◽  
Retirement Plans ◽  
Full Account ◽  
Investment Performance ◽  
Management Fees ◽  
Sustainable Investment ◽  
Managed Funds

We consider whether sustainable investment can deliver performance comparable to conventional investment in investors’ long-term retirement plans. On the capital markets, sustainable investment can be achieved through various instruments and strategies, one of them being investment in mutual funds that subscribe to ESG (environmental, social, and governance) principles. First, we compare the investment performance of ESG funds with matched conventional funds over the period 1994–2020, in Europe and the U.S. We find no significant evidence of differing performance (at 5% level) despite using a number of investment performance metrics. Second, we perform a historical backtest to model a UK personal retirement plan from 2000 till 2020, taking full account of investment management fees and transaction costs. We find that investing in an index-tracker fund overlaid with ESG screening delivers a pension which is 10.4% larger than is achieved if the index-tracker fund is used without screening. This is also 20.2% larger than is achieved by investing in a collection of actively managed funds with a sustainable purpose. We conclude that an ESG-screened long-term passive investment approach for retirement plans is likely to be successful in satisfying the twin objectives of a secure retirement income and of sustainability.

scholarly journals HOW ACCURATELY DOES 70% FINAL EMPLOYMENT EARNINGS REPLACEMENT MEASURE RETIREMENT INCOME (IN)ADEQUACY? INTRODUCING THE LIVING STANDARDS REPLACEMENT RATE (LSRR)

2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 627-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bonnie-Jeanne MacDonald ◽  
Lars Osberg ◽  
Kevin D. Moore
Keyword(s):  
Living Standards ◽  
Living Standard ◽  
Retirement Income ◽  
Home Equity ◽  
Replacement Rate ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Income Adequacy ◽  
Rate Measure ◽  
The Right ◽  
Dynamic Population

AbstractWill 70% of a worker's final annual employment earnings sustain living standards after retirement? Despite increasing skepticism, the most dominant measure of retirement income adequacy by financial planners, pensions plan advisors, academics and public policy makers is the “final employment earnings replacement rate”, where 70% is considered the right target to ensure living standards remain at approximately the same level after retirement. Using Statistics Canada's LifePaths dynamic population micro-simulation model, this paper asks whether those individuals from the 1951–1958 Canadian birth cohort who attain roughly a 70% final employment earnings replacement rate (as conventionally measured) at retirement do, in fact, achieve approximate continuity in their living standards. We find that the conventional final earnings replacement rate measure has little predictive value for living standards continuity between working-life and retirement. The primary reason is that employment earnings in a single year is not a reliable representation of a worker's standard of living — it relies on an inadequate pre-retirement measurement period, does not incorporate important components of consumption sources (such as home equity), and ignores household size (particularly children). As a result, we find that the correlation between the conventional earnings replacement rate and actual living standards continuity is relatively low (0.11). The paper therefore suggests an alternative metric for assessing how well a worker's living standard is maintained after retirement — i.e., the Living Standards Replacement Rate, or the LSRR. The LSRR provides a more accurate, understandable and consistent measure of retirement income adequacy.

Required Minimum Distributions

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 127-137
Author(s):  
John G. Kilgour
Keyword(s):  
Life Expectancy ◽  
Internal Revenue Service ◽  
Retirement Income ◽  
Defined Contribution ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Retirement Plans ◽  
Internal Revenue ◽  
Individual Requirement

Required minimum distributions (RMDs) are an important part of individual requirement accounts and defined-contribution retirement plans including 401(k), 403(b) and 457(b) plans. Such plans are intended to provide retirement income for the account owner and his or her spouse. They are not intended to pass untaxed wealth on to the next generation. RMDs do that by requiring that a portion of the balance in an account is distributed (and taxed) each year beginning by age 70½ (recently extended to age 72). This article examines the origins and extensions of RMDs, how they are calculated and how they work. It then assesses the recently enacted SECURE Act and the proposed updated Internal Revenue Service tables of the life-expectancy factors used to calculate the amount of the annual RMDs.

Perceptions of Retirement Adequacy: Evidence From South Africa

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 343-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Reyers
Keyword(s):  
Financial Risk ◽  
Time Perspective ◽  
Future Time Perspective ◽  
Risk Tolerance ◽  
Financial Behavior ◽  
Retirement Income ◽  
Retirement Savings ◽  
Savings Behavior ◽  
South Africans ◽  
Income Adequacy

Concerns regarding the adequacy of retirement savings have contributed to the move to encourage better savings behavior. One area of research focuses on understanding the profile of individuals who believe they are preparing adequately for retirement. The current study uses data from a national survey of South Africans to determine how confident workers are about their future retirement income adequacy, and whether behavioral characteristics play a role in their perception of retirement readiness. This study highlights the role that behavioral factors play in perceptions of retirement income adequacy in an African developing market context. In particular, financial risk tolerance, future time perspective, good financial behavior, and self-assessed financial knowledge are all found to be positively related to respondents’ retirement confidence.

Retirement Income Programs: The Next Step in the Transition from DB to DC Retirement Plans

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 11-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wade D. Pfau ◽  
Joseph A. Tomlinson ◽  
Steve Vernon
Keyword(s):  
Retirement Income ◽  
Retirement Plans
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document