Regulatory Process, Regulatory Reform, and the Quality of Regulatory Impact Analysis

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry Ellig ◽  
Rosemarie Fike
Keyword(s):  
Impact Analysis ◽  
Regulatory Reform ◽  
Regulatory Process ◽  
Regulatory Impact Analysis ◽  
Regulatory Impact

Regulatory Process, Regulatory Reform, and the Quality of Regulatory Impact Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 523-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry Ellig ◽  
Rosemarie Fike
Keyword(s):  
Economic Analysis ◽  
Impact Analysis ◽  
Regulatory Reform ◽  
Executive Branch ◽  
Regulatory Process ◽  
Quality Analysis ◽  
Regulatory Affairs ◽  
Regulatory Impact Analysis ◽  
Regulatory Impact

Numerous regulatory reform proposals would require federal agencies to conduct more thorough economic analysis of proposed regulations or expand the resources and influence of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), which currently reviews executive branch regulations. Such reforms are intended to improve the quality of economic analysis agencies produce when they issue major regulations. We employ newly gathered data on variation in current administrative procedures to assess the likely effects of proposed regulatory process reforms on the quality of agencies’ regulatory impact analyses (RIAs). Our results suggest that greater use of advance notices of proposed rulemakings for major regulations, advance consultation with regulated entities, use of advisory committees, and expansion of OIRA’s resources and role would improve the quality of RIAs. They also suggest pre-proposal public meetings with stakeholders are associated with lower quality analysis.

Telaah Singkat Kebijakan Akreditasi Bagi Lembaga Uji Kesesuaian Pesawat Sinar-X

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-56
Author(s):  
Endang Kunarsih ◽  
◽  
Iswandarini Iswandarini ◽  
Rusmanto Rusmanto
Keyword(s):  
Impact Analysis ◽  
Laboratory Accreditation ◽  
Testing Laboratory ◽  
Regulatory Impact Analysis ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Compliance Testing ◽  
Regulatory Impact ◽  
Implementation Progress ◽  
Test Process

Brief Review of Accreditation Policy For X-Ray Compliance Testing Laboratory The Compli¬ance Test Program has been Implemented Since 2011 and The Updated Regulation was in 2018. According to the implementation progress, adjustments are needed to the dynamics of the problems that arise. In 2021, it is planned to prepare a draft amendment to BAPETEN Regulation Number 2 of 2018; therefore, an analysis of the implementation profile of the regulation is carried out to identify existing obstacles. One of the problems identified is the polemic of the urgency of accreditation obligations for the Compliance Testing Laboratory, which is the institution appointed by the Head of BAPETEN to carry out compliance tests and issue compliance certificates. Currently, 78% of laboratories are not accredited, most of which are importing companies. Therefore, it will have implications for reducing laboratory availability and constraining the compliance test process in health facilities. This paper aims to identify aspects that can hinder the application for laboratory accreditation, especially for importing companies, and the proposed solution that can recommend. This paper uses a regulatory impact analysis approach. The study results show that laboratory accreditation is essential to maintain the quality of services, competencies, and outputs of the laboratory so that four options that LUK can take are proposed in dealing with obstacles in applying for accreditation. This paper can provide contributions in preparing the draft amendments to BAPETEN Regulation Number 2 of 2018.

scholarly journals Regulatory reform in five western Balkan countries: Evidence and perspectives

2009 ◽  
Vol 54 (182) ◽  
pp. 40-65
Author(s):  
Slavica Penev ◽  
Andreja Marusic
Keyword(s):  
Impact Analysis ◽  
Regional Cooperation ◽  
Regulatory System ◽  
Regulatory Reform ◽  
Strongly Correlated ◽  
Regulatory Impact Analysis ◽  
Strategic Approach ◽  
Balkan Countries ◽  
Harmonization Process ◽  
Regulatory Impact

This Paper analyses the importance of regulatory reform for the creation of an effective legal and regulatory system in Western Balkan countries. The authors explore the progress achieved in this reform area, arguing that regulatory reform was mostly partial, focused on specific sectors and areas, and lacked a strategic approach. It was focused on the simplification of existing regulation and the implementation of Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA). The paper concludes that in order to secure the sustainability of the regulatory reform progress, especially in the period of economic crisis, the countries in the region should apply a strategic approach in this area, focusing on the improvement of the quality of regulations and the reduction of unnecessary administrative burdens that affect business activities and investments. The process of the establishment of a competitive legal and regulatory environment should be strongly correlated with the continuation of the EU harmonization process and with the regional cooperation among the countries in the region.

scholarly journals Some aspects of implementing Regulatory Impact Analysis in Brazil

2014 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 323-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila Moreira de Castro
Keyword(s):  
Public Management ◽  
Significant Contribution ◽  
Impact Analysis ◽  
Regulatory Reform ◽  
Regulatory Agencies ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Regulatory Impact Analysis ◽  
Administrative Culture ◽  
Regulatory Impact

In an increasingly complex society, regulatory polices emerge as an important tool in public management. Nevertheless, regulation per se is no longer enough, and the agenda for a regulatory reform is increasing. Following this context, Brazil has implemented Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) in its regulatory agencies. Thus, Brazilian specificities have to be considered and, in this regard, a systematic approach provides a significant contribution. This article aims to address some critical reflections about which policy-makers should ask themselves before joining the implementation of a RIA system in the Brazilian context. Through a long-term perspective, the implementation of RIA must be seen as part of a permanent change in the administrative culture, understanding that RIA should be used as a further resource in the decision-making process, rather than a final solution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document