scholarly journals The Appropriate Legal Standard and Sufficient Economic Evidence for Exclusive Dealing Under Section 2: The FTC's McWane Case

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven C. Salop ◽  
Sharis Pozen ◽  
John Seward
Keyword(s):  
Economic Evidence ◽  
Exclusive Dealing ◽  
Legal Standard

Section 2 Mangled: FTC v. Qualcomm on the Duty to Deal, Price Squeezes, and Exclusive Dealing

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas H. Ginsburg ◽  
Joshua D. Wright ◽  
Lindsey Edwards
Keyword(s):  
Exclusive Dealing

Orders Not to Resuscitate: The Sharon Siebert Case

1981 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 3-7
Author(s):  
George J. Annas
Keyword(s):  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Lower Court ◽  
Legal Standard ◽  
Dnr Orders

In a previous column I discussed the testimony of a number of nurses in the case of Ms. Sharon Siebert. That case was decided by a lower court on February 13, 1981, and this column discusses Judge Lindsay G. Arthur's opinion. Jane Hoyt, a friend, not a relative, of Ms. Siebert, brought suit to enjoin an order not to resuscitate that had been written on Ms. Siebert. The case raised a number of important issues, including whether the court would allow a suit brought by someone in Ms. Hoyt's position vis-à-vis the patient, and if it did, what legal standard the court might require in the writing of Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders.

Economic Evidence on Potentially Curative Gene Therapy Products: A Systematic Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Khoa Ho ◽  
Kennedy Borle ◽  
Nick Dragojlovic ◽  
Manrubby Dhillon ◽  
Vanessa Kitchin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Therapy ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Economic Evidence

Requirements for Amicus Curiae Participation in International Investment ArbitrationA Deconstruction of the Procedural Wall Erected in Joint ICSID Cases ARB/10/25 and ARB/10/15

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 365-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Schliemann
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
International Investment ◽  
Recent Attempt ◽  
Arbitral Tribunal ◽  
Amicus Curiae ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Investment Arbitration ◽  
Legal Standard ◽  
Investment Law

Abstract The legal standard on amicus curiae participation in international investment arbitration has been forged by the judicial development of legal rules and, in parallel, the modification of normative sources, such as the ICSID Arbitration Rules. Current and future decisions by arbitral tribunals on the participation of amicus curiae in a given dispute must abide by this consolidated standard. In June 2012, the arbitral tribunal in Joint ICSID Cases No. ARB/10/15 and No. ARB/10/25 released a procedural order, rejecting an amicus petition. This Order contains various deviations from the applicable legal standard and severely restricts the options for amicus participation. The recent attempt to strengthen the legitimacy of international investment arbitration by allowing for greater amicus participation and the acknowledgement of the interdependence of investment law and other areas of international law is thereby put in peril.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document