scholarly journals Mandatory Disclosure Quality, Inside Ownership, and Cost of Capital

Author(s):  
John E. Core ◽  
Luzi Hail ◽  
Rodrigo S. Verdi
2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Core ◽  
Luzi Hail ◽  
Rodrigo S. Verdi

2010 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pingyang Gao

ABSTRACT: One might expect that disclosure quality improves investor welfare by reducing cost of capital. This study shows that the argument is valid only in limited circumstances. Based on a production economy with perfect competition among investors, the analysis demonstrates three points. First, cost of capital could increase with disclosure quality when new investment is sufficiently elastic. Second, there are plausible conditions under which disclosure quality reduces the welfare of current and/or new investors. Finally, cost of capital could move in opposition to the welfare of either current or new investors as disclosure quality changes.


Author(s):  
Khairil Faizal Khairi ◽  
Nur Hidayah Laili ◽  
Dung Manh Tran

This study sets out to offer proof of several important questions relating to the quality of information disclosed on goodwill impairment process under the new requirements of FRS 36. This study investigates the compliance level and disclosure quality of FRS 36 by top 20 of Singaporean listed firms in SGX at 2007 based on their market capitalization. In order to achieve the objective of this study, the weight- ed index is chosen because this index is able to differentiate the quality and impor- tance of each mandatory disclosure under FRS 36. The weighted index was developed by constructing a disclosure scoring sheet, obtaining annual reports of 20 sampled Singapore firms for particular year, complet- ing scoring sheet for each firms by assigned weighted for the disclosure items and calculating disclosure weighted index. The weighted index was analyzed to examine the firm’s compliance with the FRS 36 disclosure requirements. The results of this study revealed that 18 out of 20 (90%) firms in Singapore failed to comply with the most basic elements of the FRS 36 pertaining to goodwill impairment testing espe- cially in allocating goodwill into the CGUs and key assumptions used in determin- ing the recoverable amount of CGU assets.


2000 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Bloomfield ◽  
T. Jeffrey Wilks

Greater disclosure quality leads to higher prices and greater liquidity in a laboratory financial market, and these effects are stronger when investors face the risk of unpredictable demand shocks. These results are consistent with a broad class of theoretical and empirical studies. Disclosure has larger effects on prices and liquidity at greater market depths. We conclude that archival studies looking only at quoted transaction prices and spreads (which typically pertain to small transactions) may underestimate the potential importance of disclosure on larger transactions that occur at greater market depths.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document