scholarly journals Are Bad Health and Pain Making Us Grumpy? An Empirical Evaluation of Reporting Heterogeneity in Rating Health System Responsiveness

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluca Fiorentini ◽  
Giovanni Ragazzi ◽  
Silvana Robone
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Empirical Evaluation ◽  
Reporting Heterogeneity ◽  
System Responsiveness ◽  
Health System Responsiveness

scholarly journals The Effect of Health System Responsiveness on Health Outcome: Evidence from Spain

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Solomon Kibret Abreha
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Outcome ◽  
Health System ◽  
Waiting Time ◽  
Hospital Care ◽  
Ordered Probit ◽  
Reporting Heterogeneity ◽  
System Responsiveness ◽  
Health System Responsiveness ◽  
Self Assessed Health

Abstract Background For the last two decades, the health system responsiveness has gained attention in the health policy area. However, little is known about its effect within the healthcare system on health outcome. This study aims to investigate the influence of health system responsiveness on self-assessed health. Particularly it examines if self-assessed health is affected by satisfaction with communication, dignity and waiting time.Methods The study used data from the Spanish Health Care Barometer Survey (SHBS) between 2011 and 2013. The Ordered Probit and the Hierarchical Ordered Probit (HOPIT) model was used to model anchoring vignettes and to control the problem of reporting heterogeneity arises from self-reported health.Results The result suggests a strong positive association between reporting very good self-assessed health and most of the domains of health system responsiveness. Specifically, after adjusting for reporting heterogeneity, satisfaction with waiting time and communication were found to be statistically significant and positively associated with reporting better self-assessed health for respondents in primary care and hospital care settings, respectively in Spain. The marginal effect of a one unit increase in satisfaction with waiting time in primary care and communication in hospital care is associated with a 2% and 4% increase in the in the likelihood of reporting very good health status respectively, keeping other variables constant.Conclusions Overall, the result suggests that improving patient’s satisfaction with health systems responsiveness may have a positive influence on patients’ health outcomes.

scholarly journals Health system responsiveness: a systematic evidence mapping review of the global literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gadija Khan ◽  
Nancy Kagwanja ◽  
Eleanor Whyle ◽  
Lucy Gilson ◽  
Sassy Molyneux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Feedback Loops ◽  
Theoretical Development ◽  
World Health ◽  
Evidence Map ◽  
Evidence Mapping ◽  
Mapping Review ◽  
System Responsiveness ◽  
Health System Responsiveness

Abstract Background The World Health Organisation framed responsiveness, fair financing and equity as intrinsic goals of health systems. However, of the three, responsiveness received significantly less attention. Responsiveness is essential to strengthen systems’ functioning; provide equitable and accountable services; and to protect the rights of citizens. There is an urgency to make systems more responsive, but our understanding of responsiveness is limited. We therefore sought to map existing evidence on health system responsiveness. Methods A mixed method systemized evidence mapping review was conducted. We searched PubMed, EbscoHost, and Google Scholar. Published and grey literature; conceptual and empirical publications; published between 2000 and 2020 and English language texts were included. We screened titles and abstracts of 1119 publications and 870 full texts. Results Six hundred twenty-one publications were included in the review. Evidence mapping shows substantially more publications between 2011 and 2020 (n = 462/621) than earlier periods. Most of the publications were from Europe (n = 139), with more publications relating to High Income Countries (n = 241) than Low-to-Middle Income Countries (n = 217). Most were empirical studies (n = 424/621) utilized quantitative methodologies (n = 232), while qualitative (n = 127) and mixed methods (n = 63) were more rare. Thematic analysis revealed eight primary conceptualizations of ‘health system responsiveness’, which can be fitted into three dominant categorizations: 1) unidirectional user-service interface; 2) responsiveness as feedback loops between users and the health system; and 3) responsiveness as accountability between public and the system. Conclusions This evidence map shows a substantial body of available literature on health system responsiveness, but also reveals evidential gaps requiring further development, including: a clear definition and body of theory of responsiveness; the implementation and effectiveness of feedback loops; the systems responses to this feedback; context-specific mechanism-implementation experiences, particularly, of LMIC and fragile-and conflict affected states; and responsiveness as it relates to health equity, minority and vulnerable populations. Theoretical development is required, we suggest separating ideas of services and systems responsiveness, applying a stronger systems lens in future work. Further agenda-setting and resourcing of bridging work on health system responsiveness is suggested.

scholarly journals Making health care responsive to the needs of older people

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 785-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jackie Bridges ◽  
Catherine Pope ◽  
Jeffrey Braithwaite
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Older People ◽  
Health System ◽  
Health Needs ◽  
Age Related ◽  
System Responsiveness ◽  
Inpatient Nursing ◽  
Health System Responsiveness ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Individual Clinician

Abstract This commentary highlights the importance of health system responsiveness to older people living with complex health needs. Age-related changes and associated morbidity can present barriers to identifying an individual’s health needs, expectations, values and preferences, and so sufficient time, skill and resource is required to inform the development of a tailored plan for each individual. A focus on responsiveness moves thinking beyond the responsibilities of the individual clinician in the single encounter, and allows us to identify elements of the wider system that may constrain how well the clinician is able to respond. Setting the goal of responsive health care requires us to assess the suitability of wider health system features and processes for meeting the diverse needs of individual people throughout their journey, and the extent to which the system can adapt dynamically as needs change. Standardised approaches to care prescribed across organisations (such as time-based targets or routinised approaches to inpatient nursing care) are likely to result in low responsiveness as individual complexity grows, disadvantaging patients with needs that do not fit the prescribed approach. Responsiveness is high when individual practitioners and clinical teams have the resources, decentralised authority, flexibility and autonomy to provide the care required. Building a more responsive health system requires a greater understanding of how these conditions can be achieved.

scholarly journals Health system responsiveness in maternity care at Hadiya zone public hospitals in Southern Ethiopia: Users’ perspectives

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. e0258092
Author(s):  
Ritbano Ahmed Abdo ◽  
Hassen Mosa Halil ◽  
Biruk Assefa Kebede ◽  
Abebe Alemu Anshebo ◽  
Minychil Demelash Ayalew ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Health System ◽  
Maternity Care ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
Southern Ethiopia ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression ◽  
System Responsiveness ◽  
Health System Responsiveness ◽  
Hadiya Zone

Background Health system responsiveness refers to non-financial, non-clinical qualities of care that reflect respect for human dignity and interpersonal aspects of the care process. The non-clinical aspects of the health system are therefore essential to the provision of services to patients. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to assess the responsiveness in maternity care, domain performance and factors associated with responsiveness in maternity care in the Hadiya Zone public Hospitals in Southern Ethiopia. Methods A hospital-based cross-sectional study was employed on 413 participants using a systematic sampling technique from 1 July to 1 August 2020. An exit interviewer–administered questionnaire was used to collect data. EpiData (version 3.1) and SPSS (version 24) software were used for data entry and analysis, respectively. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression were computed to identify the associated factors of health system responsiveness in maternity care at 95% CI. Results The findings indicated that 53.0% of users gave high ratings for responsiveness in delivery care. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, mothers aged ≥ 35 (AOR = 0.4; 95% CI = 0.1–0.9), urban resident (AOR = 2.5; 95% CI = 1.5–4.8), obstetrics complications during the current pregnancy (AOR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.1–3.0), and caesarean delivery (AOR = 0.4; 95% CI = 0.2–0.7) were factors associated with poor ratings for responsiveness in maternity care. Conclusion In the hospitals under investigation, responsiveness in maternity care was found to be good. The findings of this study suggest that the ministry of health and regional health bureau needs to pay attention to health system responsiveness as an indicator of the quality of maternity care.

scholarly journals Assessing health system responsiveness to the needs of older people

2021 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Gonzalez-Bautista ◽  
Patricia Morsch ◽  
Mallika Mathur ◽  
Angelo Goncalves Bos ◽  
Carolina Hommes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older People ◽  
Health System ◽  
System Responsiveness ◽  
Health System Responsiveness
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document