No Shoehorn Required: How a Required, Three-Year, Persuasion-Based Legal Writing Program Easily Fits within the Broader Law School Curriculum

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Lamparello ◽  
Charles E. MacLean
Keyword(s):  
School Curriculum ◽  
Law School ◽  
Writing Program ◽  
Legal Writing

scholarly journals The Theoretical and Practical Underpinnings of Teaching Scholarly Legal Writing

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 523-557
Author(s):  
Jessica Wherry Clark ◽  
Kristen E. Murray
Keyword(s):  
Writing Process ◽  
School Curriculum ◽  
Law School ◽  
Law Students ◽  
The Other ◽  
Scholarly Writing ◽  
Independent Writing ◽  
Legal Writing ◽  
Minimum Requirements ◽  
Upper Level

Scholarly writing has long been a part of the upper-level law school curriculum. Like children thrown into the deep end of the pool to see if they can swim, every year, thousands of upper-level law students are asked to write a scholarly paper to satisfy an upper-level writing requirement on a topic likely of little acquaintance to them. For many of these law students, the scholarly writing process is daunting1 given the unknown subject matter, the lack of structured feedback and guidance, and the inability to become engaged or inspired by the project because of the often-isolating experience of writing a scholarly paper. These students, whether they are writing journal notes, seminar papers, independent writing projects, or LL.M. theses, will have varying levels of success with these projects. Like a swimmer who barely makes it to the other side of the pool, some will sink—submitting a weak paper that meets the minimum requirements. Some will reach the other side of the pool more successfully, but only after struggling through long periods of treading water. These students will submit a final paper, but even the well-written papers will not reflect an enjoyable, engaged experience for students. A handful of students will take on the challenge with strong instruction and guidance from an able coach; this group of students will have a uniquely enjoyable scholarly writing experience producing a strong contribution to student scholarship. Some of these students will even see their work published.

scholarly journals Interdisciplinarity and Clinical Legal Education: how synergies can improve access to rights in prison

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 210
Author(s):  
Cecilia Blengino
Keyword(s):  
Social Change ◽  
Legal Education ◽  
School Curriculum ◽  
Law School ◽  
Education Movement ◽  
The Future ◽  
Legal Positivist ◽  
The Law ◽  
Improve Access ◽  
Positivist Approach

<p>This article discusses the resistance experienced by the clinical legal education movement in Italy due to a widespread legal positivist approach which views law as a self-contained technical subject, and excludes interdisciplinarity from the law school curriculum.</p><p>The choice that the newly-born Italian CLE movement now faces is the option to either become a new socio-legal epistemology of law in action and a social change-maker, or to ascribe to a simple restyling of legal education to include certain practical activities aimed at introducing students to the profession. The future of the movement will depend on whether the rapid increase in the number of clinics will be matched by appropriate reflection on "how clinics might be consciously designed around exposing students to gaps between the law in books and the law in action".</p>

Teaching Health Law

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 863-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marshall B. Kapp
Keyword(s):  
Medical Schools ◽  
School Curriculum ◽  
Law School ◽  
Faculty Members ◽  
Health Law ◽  
Tenure Track ◽  
Law Schools ◽  
Faculty Position ◽  
Roles And Responsibilities ◽  
Law Faculty

Thirty years ago when I, an attorney, took a tenure-track faculty position at an innovative, newly opened medical school, I was an oddity — truly, a stranger in a strange land. Today it is not uncommon for American medical schools to employ an attorney as a tenured or tenure-track member of its faculty. Over these last three decades, the educational roles and responsibilities of health law faculty who teach in law schools have become increasingly well defined, with numerous health law courses and textbooks now generally accepted as part of the typical law school curriculum. However, the roles and responsibilities of attorney faculty members who teach in medical schools remain less clearly defined and likely are more individualized to the particular medical schools in which they teach. This essay explores some of the challenges and the opportunities which are given to attorney faculty members who teach in medical schools.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document