scholarly journals Human Capital and Long-Run Labor Income Risk

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Benzoni ◽  
Olena Chyruk
Keyword(s):  
Human Capital ◽  
Labor Income ◽  
Income Risk ◽  
Labor Income Risk ◽  
Long Run

Explaining Puzzles

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerry E. Back
Keyword(s):  
Equity Premium ◽  
Labor Income ◽  
Income Risk ◽  
Labor Income Risk ◽  
Catching Up ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Rare Disasters ◽  
Risk Free Rate ◽  
Long Run Risks ◽  
Free Rate

Various models proposed to explain the equity premium or risk‐free rate puzzle are explained: external habits (Abel’s “catching up with the Joneses” model and the Campbell‐Cochrane model), rare disasters, Epstein‐Zin‐Weil utility, long run risks, and idiosyncratic uninsurable labor income risk. External habits allow the SDF to be variable without requiring high variability of consumption. The SDF for a representative investor with Epstein‐Zin‐Weil utility depends on consumption and the market return. It is most useful when the world is not IID, as in the long‐run risks model. With uninsurable labor income risk, there is no representative investor even if investors all have the same CRRA utility, and there is additional exibility to explain asset returns.

scholarly journals International Diversification and Labor Income Risk

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Fugazza ◽  
Maela Giofré ◽  
Giovanna Nicodano
Keyword(s):  
International Diversification ◽  
Labor Income ◽  
Income Risk ◽  
Labor Income Risk

scholarly journals The Nature of Household Labor Income Risk

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (034) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seth Pruitt ◽  
◽  
Nicholas Turner ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Household Labor ◽  
Labor Income ◽  
Income Risk ◽  
Labor Income Risk

Home Bias in International Macroeconomics

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viktoria Hnatkovska
Keyword(s):  
Exchange Rate ◽  
Home Bias ◽  
International Macroeconomics ◽  
World Market ◽  
Labor Income ◽  
Income Risk ◽  
Labor Income Risk ◽  
Equity Home Bias ◽  
The World ◽  
Over Time

Home bias in international macroeconomics refers to the fact that investors around the world tend to allocate majority of their portfolios into domestic assets, despite the potential benefits to be had from international diversification. This phenomenon has been occurring across countries, over time, and across equity or bond portfolios. The bias towards domestic assets tends to be larger in developing countries relative to developed economies, with Europe characterized by the lowest equity home bias, while Central and South America—by the highest equity home bias. In addition, despite the secular decline in the level of equity home bias over time in all countries and regions, home bias still remains a robust feature of the data. Whether home bias is a puzzle depends on the portfolio allocation that one uses as a theoretical benchmark. For instance, home bias in equity portfolio is a puzzle when assessed through the lens of a simple international capital asset pricing model (CAPM) with homogeneous investors. This model predicts that investors should hold world market portfolios, namely a portfolio with the share of domestic asset equal to the share of those assets in the world market portfolio. For instance, since the share of US equity in the world capitalization in 2016 was 56%, then US investors should allocate 56% of their equity portfolio into local assets, while investing the remaining 44% into foreign equities. Instead, foreign equity comprised just 23% of US equity portfolio in 2016, hence the equity home bias. Alternative portfolio benchmark comes from the theories that emphasize costs for trading assets in international financial markets. These include transaction and information costs, differential tax treatments, and more broadly, differences in institutional environments. This research, however, has so far been unable to reach a consensus on the explanatory power of such costs. Yet another theory argues that equity home bias can arise due to the hedging properties of local equity. In particular, local equity can provide insurance from real exchange rate risk and non-tradable income risk (such as labor income risk), and thus a preference towards home equities is not a puzzle, but rather an optimal response to such risks. These theories, main advances and results in the macroeconomic literature on home bias are discussed in this article. It starts by presenting some empirical facts on the extent and dynamics of equity home bias in developed and developing countries. It is then shown how home bias can arise as an equilibrium outcome of the hedging demand in the model with real exchange rate and non-tradable labor income risk. Since solving models with portfolio choice is challenging, the recent advances in solving such models are also outlined in this article. Integrating the portfolio dynamics into models that can generate realistic asset price and exchange rate dynamics remains a fruitful avenue for future research. A discussion of additional open questions in this research agenda and suggestions for further readings are also provided.

scholarly journals International diversification and industry-related labor income risk

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 764-783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Fugazza ◽  
Maela Giofré ◽  
Giovanna Nicodano
Keyword(s):  
International Diversification ◽  
Labor Income ◽  
Income Risk ◽  
Labor Income Risk
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document