scholarly journals Did Cuts in State Aid During the Great Recession Lead to Changes in Local Property Taxes?

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajashri Chakrabarti ◽  
Max Livingston ◽  
Joydeep Roy
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajashri Chakrabarti ◽  
Max Livingston ◽  
Joydeep Roy

The Great Recession led to marked declines in state revenue. In this paper we investigate whether (and how) local school districts modified their funding and taxing decisions in response to state aid declines in the post-recession period. Our results reveal school districts responded to state aid cuts in the post-recession period by countering these cuts. Relative to the pre-recession period, a unit decrease in state aid was associated with a relative increase in local funding. To further probe the school district role, we explore whether the property tax rate, which reflects decisions of districts facing budgetary needs, responded to state aid cuts. We find, relative to the pre-recession period, the post-recession period was characterized by a strong negative relationship between property tax rate and state aid per pupil. We also find important heterogeneities in these responses by region, property wealth, and importance of School Tax Relief Program revenue in district budgets.


2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 185-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunji Kim

Public finance theories argue local governments should primarily use broad-based and stable property taxes. However, the housing bust after the Great Recession challenges this argument, and historical trends show cities have heavily relied on charges since the late 1970s. Using 2012 Census of Governments data for 2,396 cities, this article explores which cities rely more on charges and the links between property tax dependence and city stress. Regression results show property tax dependence is linked to capacity, while charges dependence is linked to stress. Charges can be a useful revenue tool for cities under stress, but they may be regressive and their use may be limited to urban places with services that can be charged for and cities with growth pressures and less stringent tax and expenditure limitations. Absent equalization efforts from higher-level governments, barriers to using charges, which cities have little control over, may increase inequality among cities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document