Market Value Signal Extraction and the Misapplication of SFAS 133 in the U.S. GSE's

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Apostolos Xanthopoulos
2010 ◽  
Vol 77 (8) ◽  
pp. 1322-1338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen-Chi Lou ◽  
Tsung-Pei Lee ◽  
Shang-Chi Gong ◽  
Shu-Ling Lin

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (17) ◽  
pp. 6785
Author(s):  
Bryan Schmutz ◽  
Minoo Tehrani ◽  
Lawrence Fulton ◽  
Andreas W. Rathgeber

Sustainability and corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategies of companies delineate the health and the welfare of the communities across the globe. The two major goals of this study are (1) To explore the relationship between the environmental regulations, market value, and adoption of sustainability and CSR strategies of the publicly traded firms listed on the Dow Jones Sustainability Indices (DJSI) and (2) To examine the impact of being added to or deleted from DJSI per different market sectors for the firms in the U.S. and the European Union (EU). The selected starting window, the year 2015, for studying the impact of addition to or deletion from the DJS indices was the Paris Accord proposal by the EU and strict sustainability regulations of the EU versus the U.S. We used event study methodology and regression analyses to explain the cumulative abnormal returns utilizing firms’ characteristics and specific market sectors. In addition, the other focus of the study was on heavy (polluting) industries and investigating if the addition to or deletion of the firms in these industries from the sustainability indices had an impact on the market value. The findings of this study reveal no impact of the environmental rules and regulations on adopting sustainability and CSR strategies by either the EU or the U.S. firms. The novel findings of this study indicate a significant negative impact on the market value of firms in heavy industries, Energy, Basic Materials, and Utilities when added to the DJS indices. The study discusses the underlying reasons for these differences and proposes strategies to enhance the impact of addition to or deletion from the DISI to increase firms’ commitments to sustainability and CSR strategies and altering the attitudes of the investors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (02) ◽  
pp. 1950012
Author(s):  
MAHDIYEH ENTEZARKHEIR

Patent ownership Fragmentation following the U.S. pro-patent shifts has built overlapping intellectual property rights or patent thickets. This has made the use of others’ innovations costlier due to transaction costs, licensing fees, and hold-up. Using panel data on 2,441 public U.S. manufacturing firms for 1976–2002, I find that patent thickets lower firms’ expected profit and their market value. I also find that firms with a large patent portfolio experience a smaller effect, likely because stronger bargaining position lowers the hold-up likelihood. There is no systematic time effect from patent thickets on firms’ market value with a large patent portfolio size.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 29-56
Author(s):  
Jimmy F. Downes ◽  
Mollie E. Mathis ◽  
Lisa Kutcher

ABSTRACT As the U.S. dollar (USD) strengthens relative to foreign currencies, the USD value of foreign subsidiary-to-parent dividends decreases, and the foreign tax credit remains anchored at a blended rate. During periods of USD strength, this asymmetry lowers the effective tax cost of repatriation at the cost of a lower after-tax dividend to the U.S. parent. This paper develops a firm-specific measure of currency exposure and provides evidence that repatriation likelihood increases during periods of firm-specific USD strength. We show that investors place a premium on repatriation costs when the USD strengthens against a firm-specific basket of currencies for repatriating firms. This premium implies that investors value the benefit of a lower effective tax cost of repatriation more than the potential cost of a lower after-tax dividend available to the U.S. parent. These results appear concentrated in firms with high levels of foreign cash and firms susceptible to earnings fixation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document