scholarly journals Family Ownership, Altruism and Agency Costs in Australian Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Xiang ◽  
Andrew C. Worthington ◽  
Helen Higgs
Keyword(s):  
Agency Costs ◽  
Family Ownership

The debt agency costs of family ownership in small and micro firms

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mervi Niskanen ◽  
Jyrki Niskanen ◽  
Virpi Laukkanen
Keyword(s):  
Agency Costs ◽  
Family Ownership

scholarly journals RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FAMILY OWNERSHIP, AGENCY COSTS TOWARDS FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE AND BUSINESS STRATEGY AS MEDIATION

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (0) ◽  
pp. 49-58
Author(s):  
Enni Savitri
Keyword(s):  
Financial Performance ◽  
Business Strategy ◽  
Agency Costs ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Partial Least Square ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Business Strategies ◽  
Family Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
The Relationship

This study investigates the relationship between family ownership, agency costs, financial performance, and companies’ business strategies. The targeted population of this study were all 143 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during 2007–2014. About 31% (45) of these manufacturing companies are family companies. The hypotheses were tested using the partial least-square (PLS) method. Our findings reveal that the companies’ business strategies are not affected by the family ownership. Family ownership and business strategies influence companies’ financial performance. Agency costs influence business strategy and financial performance, and this shows that agency costs contribute to both the increase and decrease of financial performance. Business strategy mediates the relationship between family ownership and financial performance. This shows that family companies do not concentrate on financial goals but rather on the sustainability. Business strategy influences the relationship between agency costs and financial performance. This shows that funds can be redistributed in the course of business strategy planning, which will, in turn, improve the company’s development.

Governance and long-term operating performance of family and non-family firms in Australia

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 398-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enver Halili ◽  
Ali Salman Saleh ◽  
Rami Zeitun
Keyword(s):  
Agency Costs ◽  
Family Firms ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Operating Performance ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Family Ownership ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Impact

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to conduct a comparative analysis of the long-term operating performance of family and non-family firms from the agency theoretic perspective. The analysis is focused on investigating the impact of family ownership on principal–agent conflicts of interest. Design/methodology/approach – This paper examines the relationship between firm operating performance and family ownership for a large sample of 677 Australian-listed companies. The paper uses the Generalised Method of Moments (GMM) estimator model developed by Arellano and Bond (1991) and used by other studies in finance (Baltagi, 2012; Bond, 2002; Mohamed et al., 2008). Findings – The empirical results show that firms with ownership concentration has a better operating performance due to the alignment of owner-management interests. This study also finds that family-listed companies have higher survival rates and perform better than non-family companies. Findings support the hypothesis that agency costs arise as a result of privileged access of information and self-interest behaviour of managers (outsiders) in firms with dispersed ownership structures. Originality/value – Earlier studies have only focused on short-term perspectives, particularly investigating small and medium types of Australian family businesses from narrow aspects, such as productivity, business behaviour, capital structure and leverage. Therefore, this paper has conducted a comparative examination of family and non-family firms listed on the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) to identify the impact of agency costs on their financial performance.

scholarly journals Agency costs, corporate governance mechanisms and performance of public listed family firms in Malaysia

2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 17-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Ibrahim ◽  
F. A. Samad
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Agency Costs ◽  
Family Firms ◽  
Family Ownership ◽  
Governance Mechanisms ◽  
Corporate Governance Mechanisms ◽  
Utilization Ratio ◽  
And Performance

We compare corporate governance and performance between family and non-family ownership of public listed companies in Malaysia from 1999 through 2005 measured by Tobin’s Q and ROA. We also examine the governance mechanisms as a tool in monitoring agency costs based on asset utilization ratio and expense ratio as proxy for agency costs. We find that on average firm value is lower in family firms than non-family firms, while board size, independent director and duality have a significant impact on firm performance in family firms as compared to non-family firms. We also find that these governance mechanisms have significant impact on agency costs for both family and non-family firms.

scholarly journals Family ownership, altruism and agency costs in Australian small- and medium-sized enterprises

2014 ◽  
Vol 46 (32) ◽  
pp. 3907-3921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Xiang ◽  
Andrew C. Worthington ◽  
Helen Higgs
Keyword(s):  
Agency Costs ◽  
Family Ownership

Family ownership and dividend payout in Malaysia

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 314-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Jebaraj Benjamin ◽  
Shaista Wasiuzzaman ◽  
Helen Mokhtarinia ◽  
Niloufar Rezaie Nejad
Keyword(s):  
Agency Costs ◽  
Dividend Policy ◽  
Family Firms ◽  
Percent Level ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Family Ownership ◽  
Tobit Regression ◽  
Dividend Payout ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Share Ownership

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of family ownership on dividend payout from the perspective of agency costs in Malaysia. Design/methodology/approach – Annual financial, board and family ownership data of 160 firms listed on the Bursa Malaysia are collected for the period 2005-2010. Analyses are carried out using descriptive statistics, χ2 tests, Tobit regression and three-stage least square regression analysis. Findings – The empirical results suggest that family share ownership at the dispersed level from between 0 to 5 percent is negatively associated with dividend payout and positively associated from the 5 to 33 percent level with dividend payout. Consistent with the extant literature, the observed relationship between family share ownership and dividend payout is stronger in firms with smaller total assets (size), low debt and low-growth opportunities. Further examination of investment decisions lends support to arguments which attribute higher agency costs as a result of family ownerships. Research limitations/implications – The observed results at the different family ownership levels are attributed to the possible expropriation in family-owned firms and accordingly, to the proportional pressure by minority and other shareholders for dividend payout. Practical implications – For policy makers, findings from this study could serve to justify initiatives to further strengthen the institutional and regulatory architectures that would enhance the power of minority and other shareholders of public listed firms in Malaysia. Originality/value – This study contributes to the growing literature on dividend policy and family firms. Particularly, it provides further understanding of the effect of family ownership on dividend policy.

Agency Costs, Mispricing, and Ownership Structure

CFA Digest ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 14-16
Author(s):  
Gregory G. Gocek
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Agency Costs

PENGARUH FAMILY OWNERSHIP, PERUBAHAN TARIF PAJAK DAN KEBIJAKAN HUTANG TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elfina Astrella Sambuaga
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Tax Reform ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Family Ownership ◽  
Corporate Debt ◽  
Tax Rates ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Debt Policy

<p>This study aims to provide empirical evidence related to the influence of family ownership, tax reform on corporate debt policy, and further prove the impact on the firm value.This study examined the effect of changes in tax rates in 2009 and 2010 on the relationship between family ownership structure and corporate debt policy. The population of this research is manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange for 8 consecutive years (2006-2013), with the period of observation for 7 years (2007-2013). A period of 8 years was taken to see a company that is consistently listed on the Stock Exchange prior to the end of the observation period. The result of this study shows that tax reform from progressive tax rates to a flat rate does not affect the relationship between family ownership structure and corporate debt policy. In contrast to the year 2009, changing rate from 28% to 25% in late 2010 was a significant effect on the debt policy with the company of family ownership. Based on the results, it was found that family ownership and debt policy significantly affect the company's enterprise value. It can be concluded, the higher the family ownership, the company's value would be diminished. Instead, the company's value will increase when the company adds to its debt policy.</p><p>Keywords : debt policy, family ownership, firm value, tax reform.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document